Skip to main content
Log in

Self-improvement in a complex cybernetic system and its implications for biology

  • Published:
Acta Biotheoretica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

It is commonly accepted by those who consider macroevolution as a process decoupled from microevolution that its apparent jerkiness (and, hence, incompatibility with principles of population genetics) results from the structural complexity of epigenetic systems, since all complex cybernetic systems are expected to behave discontinuously. To analyse the validity of this assumption, the process of self-improvement has been analysed in a complex cybernetic system by means of computer simulations. It turns out that the investigated system tends to develop by accumulation of as small structural changes as possible, while larger changes are likely to result in the collapse of the system rather than in its persistence or improvement. This implies that cybernetic considerations alone cannot justify the claim that the very nature of epigenetic systems induces evolution by discrete steps rather than by gradual accumulation of small changes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alberch, P. (1982). Developmental constraints in evolutionary processes. - In: J.T. Bonner (ed.), Evolution and development, 313–332. - Heidelberg: Springer Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beurlen, K. (1937).Die stammesgeschichtlichen Grundlagen der Abstammungslehre. - Jena: Gustav Fischer Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eldredge, N. and S.J. Gould (1972). Punctuated equilibria: An alternative to phyletic gradualism. - In: T.J.M. Schopf (ed.), Models in paleobiology, 82–115. - San Francisco: Freeman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldschmidt, R. (1940). The material basis of evolution. - New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gould, S.J. (1977). Ontogeny and phylogeny. - Cambridge (Mass.): Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gould, S.J. (1980a). Is a new and general theory of evolution emerging? - Paleobiology 6, 119–130.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gould, S.J. (1980b). The evolutionary biology of constraint.- Daedalus 109, 39–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gould, S.J. (1982a). Change in developmental timing as a mechanism of macroevolution. - In: J.T. Bonner (ed.), Evolution and development, 333–346. - Heidelberg: Springer Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gould, S. J. (1982b). Darwinism and the expansion of evolutionary theory. - Science 218, 380–387.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gould, S.J. and N. Eldredge (1977). Punctuated equilibria: The tempo and mode of evolution reconsidered. - Paleobiology 3, 115–151.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ho, M.-W. and P.T. Saunders (1979). Beyond neo-Darwinism — An epigenetic approach to evolution. - J. theor. Biol. 78, 573–591.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoffman, A. (1978a). System concepts and the evolution of benthic communities. - Lethaia 11, 181–185.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoffman, A. (1978b). Punctuated-equilibria evolutionary model and paleoecology. - Ann. Soc. Geol. Polon. 48, 327–331.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoffman, A. (1979). Community paleoecology as an epiphenomenal science. - Paleobiology 5, 357–379.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoffman, A. (1982). Punctuated versus gradual mode of evolution: A reconsideration. - Evol. Biol. 15, 411–436.

    Google Scholar 

  • Løvtrup, S. (1974). Epigenetics. - London: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Løvtrup, S. (1976). On the falsifiability of neo-Darwinism. - Evol. Theory 1, 267–283.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maderson, P.F.A., P. Alberch, B.C. Goodwin, S.J. Gould, A. Hoffman, J.D. Murray, D.M. Raup, A. de Ricqles, A. Seilacher, G.P. Wagner and D.B. Wake (1982). The role of development in macroevolutionary change, 279–312. - In: J.T. Bonner (ed.), Evolution and development. - Heidelberg: Springer Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maynard Smith, J. (1976). A comment on the Red Queen. - Amer. Natur. 110, 325–330.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rachootin, S. and K.S. Thomson (1981). Epigenetics, paleontology, and evolution. - In: G.G.E. Scudder and J.L. Reveal (eds.), Evolution today. - Pittsburgh: Carnegie-Mellon University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schindewolf, O.H. (1950). Grundfragen der Paläontologie. - Stuttgart: Schweizerbat'sche Verlagsbuchhandlung.

    Google Scholar 

  • Slobodkin, L.B. and A. Rapoport (1974). An optimal strategy of evolution. - Quart. Rev. Biol. 49, 181–200.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stanley, S.M. (1979). Macroevolution: Pattern and process. - San Francisco: Freeman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stanley, S.M. (1981). The new evolutionary timetable. - New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stenseth, N.C. (1979). Where have all the species gone? On the nature of extinction and the Red Queen hypothesis. - Oikos 33, 196–227.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stenseth, N.C., J. Maynard Smith and J. Haigh (MS). Coevolution in ecosystems: Red Queen evolution or stasis?

  • Van Valen, L. (1973). A new evolutionary law. - Evol. Theory 1, 1–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Valen, L. (1976). Energy and evolution. - Evol. Theory 1, 179–229.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waddington, C.H. (1957). The strategy of the genes. - London: Allen and Unwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waddington, C.H. (1975). The evolution of an evolutionist. - Ithaca: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gecow, A., Hoffman, A. Self-improvement in a complex cybernetic system and its implications for biology. Acta Biotheor 32, 61–71 (1983). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00047975

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00047975

Keywords

Navigation