Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Extractive reserves as alternative land reform: Amazonia and appalachia compared

  • Articles
  • Published:
Agriculture and Human Values Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Extractive reserves, usually associated with the survival of rubber tappers in the Brazilian tropics, have close parallels elsewhere, including temperate zones. This research isolates the distinctive features of recent Amazonian reserves, illustrates parallel features in a fifty year-old management experiment in the United States, and explores the advantages extractive reserves offer land reformers interested not only in social equity and efficiency but in biological conservation. Extractive reserves stand apart from traditional land reforms in their innovative use of common property, a tenure mode well adapted to sustainable management of marginal lands.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adkinson, Leslie B., 1945, “Community Use of Pastures on Hill Lands — The Hector Land Use Adjustment Project in Southern New York.” Bureau of Agricultural Economics, USDA and Soil Conservation Service, Upper Darby, PA (Sept.).

  • Allegretti, M. H., 1987, “Reservas Extrativistas: Uma Proposta de Desenvolvimento da Floresta Amazonica.” Paper presented at Premio Nacional de Ecologia.

  • —— 1979,Os Seringeiros (Estudo de Caso em um seringal nativo do Acre). Unpublished Masters Thesis, Dept. of Anthropology, Universidade de Brasilia, Brasilia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berkes, Fikret (ed.), 1989,Common Property Resources. London, Belhaven Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berkes, F., D. Feeny, B. J. McCay, and J. M. Acheson, 1989, “The Benefits of the Common.”Nature 340, pp. 91–93.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bromley, Daniel W., 1989, “Property Relations and Economic Development: The Other Land Reform.”World Development 17, pp. 867–77.

    Google Scholar 

  • Browder, John O., 1990, “Viewpoint: Extractive Reserves Will Not Save Tropics.”BioScience 40, p. 1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bunker, S. G., 1985,Underdeveloping the Amazon. Urbana, University of Illinois Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cronin, F. D., 1939, “Displaced Families in the Utilization Program.”Southwestern Social Science Quarterly XX, pp. 1–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Darrah, Lawrence B., 1942, “An Economic Study of Land Utilization in Schuyler County, New York.” Cornell University Agricultural Experiment Station Bulletin No. 781, Ithaca, New York.

  • Dean, Warren, 1987,Brazil and the Struggle for Rubber. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Denevan, William M., 1988, “The Geography of Fragile Lands in Latin America.” Pp. 11–24 in J. O. Browder (ed.),Fragile Lands in Latin America. Boulder, Westview Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duarte, Elio Garcia, 1987,Conflitos Pela Terra No Acre. Rio Branco, Casa de Amazonia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dugelby, Barbara, 1990, “Challenges Facing the Establishment of Extractive Reserves in the Department of Petén in Guatemala.” Paper presented at the first Meeting of the International Association for the Study of Common Property. Sept. 27–30. Duke University, Durham.

  • EIS, 1986,Final Environmental Impact Statement. Green Mountain National Forest and Finger Lakes National Forest. U.S. Department of Agriculture, U.S. Forest Service, Washington, DC.

  • Fearnside, Philip M., 1989, “Extractive Reserves in Brazilian Amazonia.”BioScience 39, pp. 387–89.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, Richard B., 1982, “From Marginal Farm to Management Showcase.” Public Use of State Wildlife Management Areas. Albany: NY State Dept. of Environmental Conservation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foote, Nelson, W. A. Anderson, and W. C. McKain, Jr., 1944, “Families Displaced in a Federal Sub-Marginal Land Purchase Program.” Dept. of Rural Sociology Bulletin No. 11, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY.

    Google Scholar 

  • GAO, 1988,Rangeland and Management. U. S. General Accounting Office. Washington, DC, June.

  • Geisler, Charles C., 1984, “A History of Land Reform in the United States: Old Wine, New Battles.” Pp. 7–31 in C. Geisler and F. Popper (eds.),Land Reform, American Style. Totowa, NJ, Rowman and Allenheld.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gold, Ray L., 1985,Ranching, Mining and the Human Impact of natural Resource Development. New Brunswick, Transaction Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hardin, Garrett, 1968, “Tragedy of the Commons.”Science 162, pp. 1243–1248.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harkness, James, 1990, “Common Property, Extractive Economies, and Conservation in Chinea: Social Change and Sustainability at the Shalong Nature Reserve.” Paper presented at the International Association for the Study of Common Property Conference, Durham, Sept.

  • Hart, V. B., 1939, “Land Use in New York.” Cornell Extension Bulletin 406. (April), Ithaca, NY.

  • Hecht, S. and A. Cockburn, 1989, TheFate of the Forest. London, Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hecht, S., R. Norgaard, and G. Possio, 1988, “The Economics of Cattle Ranching in Eastern Amazonia.”Interciencia 13, pp. 5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heinzman, R. and C. Reining, 1990, “Sustained Rural Development: Extractive Forest Reserves in the Northern Peten of Guatemala.” Working Paper No. 37. USAID/Guatemala.

  • Homma, Alfredo K., 1989, “Reservas Estractivistitas: Uma Opcao de desenvolvimento Viavel Para a Amazonia?”Para Desenvolvimento 24 (Jan./Dez.) pp. 38–56

    Google Scholar 

  • IEA, 1989, “Man and the Environment in the Amazonia,” Schedule of Work for the Institute for Amazonion Studies (Instituto de Estudos Amazonicos, (Sept.) Curitiba. Internal Report.

  • James, G. S., 1966, “A Study of the Use, Potential and Future Administration of the Hector Land Use Project,” Supplement to Land Classification Memorandum to the Chief Forester, USDA. Milwaukee, WI.

  • Johnson, O. E. G., “Economic Analysis, The Legal Framework and Land Tenure Systems.”J. Law and Econ. 15, pp. 259–76.

  • Kiff, Janet, 1972, “The Use of Common Grazing Land in the New Forest, Hampshire.” Discussion Papers inConservation 2, University College, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • LaFleur, James, 1989, “Extractive Economies in Tropical Forests: Alternative Economic Models for Elevating Forest Values.“ Paper presented at the Extractive Economies Symposium, National Wildlife Federation, (November), Washington, DC.

  • Lucas, William J. and Paul Shaw Jr., 1963, “History of Grazing and Multiple Use on the Hector, New York Land Utilization Project.” Paper presented at the National Meeting of the Society of American Foresters, Boston.

  • Machacek, John, 1983, “Feds Drop Plans to Sell Hector: Forest Service to Take Over.”The Ithaca Journal (Friday, 24 June), pp. 1 & 2.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCay, Bonnie J. and James M. Acheson, eds., 1987,The Question of the Commons: The Culture and Ecology of Communal Property. Tucson, University of Arizona Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ministerio da Agricultura, 1988, Alteracao da Cobertura Vegetal Natural do Estado do Acre. Brasilia, Min. da Agric./IBDF.

  • Mitchell, H. L., 1979,Mean Things Happening in this Land. Montclair, NJ, Allenheld, Osmun.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moran, E. F., 1989, “Adaptation and Maladaptation in Newly Settled Areas,” Pp. 20–39 in D. A. Schumann and W. L. Partridge (eds.),The Human Ecology of Tropical Land Settlement in Latin America. Boulder, Westview.

    Google Scholar 

  • Netting, R. M., 1981,Balancing on an Alp: Ecological Change and Continuity in a Swiss Mountain Community. London, Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ostrom, Elinor, 1990,Governing the Commons. New York, Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parfit, Michael, 1989, “Whose Hands Will Shape the Future of the Amazon's Green Mansions?”Smithsonian, November, pp. 58–74.

  • Peluso, Nancy, 1989, “The Rattan Trade in East Kalimantan, Indonesia: Can Extraction be Reserved?” Paper presented at Symposium on “Extractive Economies in Tropical Forests: A Course of Action,” at National Wildlife Federation, Washington, DC.

  • Peters, C. M., A. H. Gentry, and R. O. Mendelsohm, 1989, “Valuation of an Amazonian Rainforest.”Nature 339, pp. 655–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Record of Decision, 1986, Final Environmental Impact Statement and Land and Resource Management Plan. U. S. Department of Agriculture/U. S. Forest Service, Washington, DC.

  • Rowley, William D., 1985, UnitedStates Forest Service Grazing and Rangelands. College Station, Texas A & M University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salamon, Lester, 1974, “The Time Dimension in Policy Evaluation: The Case of the New Deal Land Reform Experiments.” Paper presented at Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, Chicago.

  • Schwartzman, Stephan, 1989a, “Extractive Reserves: Distribution of Wealth and the Social Costs of Frontier Development in the Amazon.” Paper presented to National Wildlife Federation/World Wildlife Fund/Conservation Foundation Symposium, “Extractive Economies in Tropical Forests: A Course of Action.” (Nov. 30-Dec. 1) Washington, DC.

  • --, 1989b, “Extractive Reserves: The Rubber Tappers' Strategy for Sustainable Use of the Amazon Rainforest.” Pp. 150–165 in J. O. Browder (ed.),Fragile Lands of Latin America. Boulder, Westview.

  • Schwartzman, S. and M. H. Allegretti, 1987, “Extractive Production in the Amazon and the Rubber Tappers' Movement.” Paper commissioned by the Environmental Defense Fund, Washington, DC.

  • Shaw, Paul, Jr., 1969, Land Classification Study New York. USFS-United States Department of Agriculture. Montour Falls, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • --, 1965, Report on A Study of the Hector Land Use Area, New York (NUY-LU-21), Preliminary Draft (Nov. 2) Forest Service, U. S. Dept. of Agriculture, Montour Falls, NY.

  • Short, C.G., 1989,Ronald Reagan and the Public Lands: America's Conservation Debate, 1979–1984. College Station, Texas A&M.

  • Silberling, Louise, 1992, “Social Movements and Successful Common Property Regimes: The Case of Brazilian Rubber Tappers.” Unpublished Masters Thesis. Ithaca, Cornell University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, D.J. and C. R. Smith, 1991, “Henslow's Sparrow and Grasshopper Sparrow: A Comparison of Habitat Use in finger Lakes National Forest, New York.”Bird Observer 20, pp. 187–193.

    Google Scholar 

  • Snyder, Darwin, 1961, “A Study of the Pasture Aspects of the Hector Land Use Areas in Southern New York.” Unpublished Masters Thesis. Cornell University, Ithaca, NY.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sparks, Samantha, 1989, “Labor Rights and Ecology in the Rain Forest.”Multinational Monitor 3, pp. 26–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tangley, Laura, 1988, “Research Priorities for Conservation.”BioScience 38, pp. 444–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thiesenhusen, Wm. and Jolyne Melmed-Sanjak, 1990, “Brazil's Agrarian Structure: Changes from 1970–1990.”World Development 18: 3, pp. 393–415.

    Google Scholar 

  • USDA/FLNF, 1979,Preliminary Land Use Plan. U. S. Forest Service: Montour Falls, NY.

    Google Scholar 

  • USDA/FLNF, 1986, Land and Resource Management Plan. Finger Lakes National Forest. U. S. Department of Agriculture/U. S. Forest Service. Washington, DC.

  • Weinstein, Barbara, 1983,The Amazon Rubber Boom, 1985–1920. Stanford, The Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wooten, H. H., 1965,The Land Utilization Program, 1934 to 1964. Ag. Econ. Report No. 85, Economic Research Service, USDA, Washington, DC.

  • World Commission on the Environment and Development, 1987,Our Common Future. New York, Oxford.

Download references

Authors

Additional information

Charles Geisler is an associate professor of rural sociology at Cornell University. He works on issues of land ownership, use, and reform in the United States and Latin America, on the integration of human livelihoods into parks and protected areas, and on the social impact assessment of resource development on rural peoples.

Louise Silberling is a doctoral candidate in development sociology at Cornell University. Research interests include extractive reserves, common property regimes, the role of social movements in resource management and land use planning. Her recent work has been in the Alto Jurua, Acre, with the National Council of Rubber Tappers and the Alliance of the Peoples of the Forest.

Research support for this paper is gratefully acknowledged from Hatch Project No. 550, College of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Cornell University for field work in New York and from the Conservation and Research Foundation of New London, CT for Silberling's 1989 research in Brazil.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Geisler, C., Silberling, L. Extractive reserves as alternative land reform: Amazonia and appalachia compared. Agric Hum Values 9, 58–70 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02217921

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02217921

Keywords

Navigation