Abstract
Extractive reserves, usually associated with the survival of rubber tappers in the Brazilian tropics, have close parallels elsewhere, including temperate zones. This research isolates the distinctive features of recent Amazonian reserves, illustrates parallel features in a fifty year-old management experiment in the United States, and explores the advantages extractive reserves offer land reformers interested not only in social equity and efficiency but in biological conservation. Extractive reserves stand apart from traditional land reforms in their innovative use of common property, a tenure mode well adapted to sustainable management of marginal lands.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Adkinson, Leslie B., 1945, “Community Use of Pastures on Hill Lands — The Hector Land Use Adjustment Project in Southern New York.” Bureau of Agricultural Economics, USDA and Soil Conservation Service, Upper Darby, PA (Sept.).
Allegretti, M. H., 1987, “Reservas Extrativistas: Uma Proposta de Desenvolvimento da Floresta Amazonica.” Paper presented at Premio Nacional de Ecologia.
—— 1979,Os Seringeiros (Estudo de Caso em um seringal nativo do Acre). Unpublished Masters Thesis, Dept. of Anthropology, Universidade de Brasilia, Brasilia.
Berkes, Fikret (ed.), 1989,Common Property Resources. London, Belhaven Press.
Berkes, F., D. Feeny, B. J. McCay, and J. M. Acheson, 1989, “The Benefits of the Common.”Nature 340, pp. 91–93.
Bromley, Daniel W., 1989, “Property Relations and Economic Development: The Other Land Reform.”World Development 17, pp. 867–77.
Browder, John O., 1990, “Viewpoint: Extractive Reserves Will Not Save Tropics.”BioScience 40, p. 1.
Bunker, S. G., 1985,Underdeveloping the Amazon. Urbana, University of Illinois Press.
Cronin, F. D., 1939, “Displaced Families in the Utilization Program.”Southwestern Social Science Quarterly XX, pp. 1–13.
Darrah, Lawrence B., 1942, “An Economic Study of Land Utilization in Schuyler County, New York.” Cornell University Agricultural Experiment Station Bulletin No. 781, Ithaca, New York.
Dean, Warren, 1987,Brazil and the Struggle for Rubber. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
Denevan, William M., 1988, “The Geography of Fragile Lands in Latin America.” Pp. 11–24 in J. O. Browder (ed.),Fragile Lands in Latin America. Boulder, Westview Press.
Duarte, Elio Garcia, 1987,Conflitos Pela Terra No Acre. Rio Branco, Casa de Amazonia.
Dugelby, Barbara, 1990, “Challenges Facing the Establishment of Extractive Reserves in the Department of Petén in Guatemala.” Paper presented at the first Meeting of the International Association for the Study of Common Property. Sept. 27–30. Duke University, Durham.
EIS, 1986,Final Environmental Impact Statement. Green Mountain National Forest and Finger Lakes National Forest. U.S. Department of Agriculture, U.S. Forest Service, Washington, DC.
Fearnside, Philip M., 1989, “Extractive Reserves in Brazilian Amazonia.”BioScience 39, pp. 387–89.
Fisher, Richard B., 1982, “From Marginal Farm to Management Showcase.” Public Use of State Wildlife Management Areas. Albany: NY State Dept. of Environmental Conservation.
Foote, Nelson, W. A. Anderson, and W. C. McKain, Jr., 1944, “Families Displaced in a Federal Sub-Marginal Land Purchase Program.” Dept. of Rural Sociology Bulletin No. 11, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY.
GAO, 1988,Rangeland and Management. U. S. General Accounting Office. Washington, DC, June.
Geisler, Charles C., 1984, “A History of Land Reform in the United States: Old Wine, New Battles.” Pp. 7–31 in C. Geisler and F. Popper (eds.),Land Reform, American Style. Totowa, NJ, Rowman and Allenheld.
Gold, Ray L., 1985,Ranching, Mining and the Human Impact of natural Resource Development. New Brunswick, Transaction Books.
Hardin, Garrett, 1968, “Tragedy of the Commons.”Science 162, pp. 1243–1248.
Harkness, James, 1990, “Common Property, Extractive Economies, and Conservation in Chinea: Social Change and Sustainability at the Shalong Nature Reserve.” Paper presented at the International Association for the Study of Common Property Conference, Durham, Sept.
Hart, V. B., 1939, “Land Use in New York.” Cornell Extension Bulletin 406. (April), Ithaca, NY.
Hecht, S. and A. Cockburn, 1989, TheFate of the Forest. London, Verso.
Hecht, S., R. Norgaard, and G. Possio, 1988, “The Economics of Cattle Ranching in Eastern Amazonia.”Interciencia 13, pp. 5.
Heinzman, R. and C. Reining, 1990, “Sustained Rural Development: Extractive Forest Reserves in the Northern Peten of Guatemala.” Working Paper No. 37. USAID/Guatemala.
Homma, Alfredo K., 1989, “Reservas Estractivistitas: Uma Opcao de desenvolvimento Viavel Para a Amazonia?”Para Desenvolvimento 24 (Jan./Dez.) pp. 38–56
IEA, 1989, “Man and the Environment in the Amazonia,” Schedule of Work for the Institute for Amazonion Studies (Instituto de Estudos Amazonicos, (Sept.) Curitiba. Internal Report.
James, G. S., 1966, “A Study of the Use, Potential and Future Administration of the Hector Land Use Project,” Supplement to Land Classification Memorandum to the Chief Forester, USDA. Milwaukee, WI.
Johnson, O. E. G., “Economic Analysis, The Legal Framework and Land Tenure Systems.”J. Law and Econ. 15, pp. 259–76.
Kiff, Janet, 1972, “The Use of Common Grazing Land in the New Forest, Hampshire.” Discussion Papers inConservation 2, University College, London.
LaFleur, James, 1989, “Extractive Economies in Tropical Forests: Alternative Economic Models for Elevating Forest Values.“ Paper presented at the Extractive Economies Symposium, National Wildlife Federation, (November), Washington, DC.
Lucas, William J. and Paul Shaw Jr., 1963, “History of Grazing and Multiple Use on the Hector, New York Land Utilization Project.” Paper presented at the National Meeting of the Society of American Foresters, Boston.
Machacek, John, 1983, “Feds Drop Plans to Sell Hector: Forest Service to Take Over.”The Ithaca Journal (Friday, 24 June), pp. 1 & 2.
McCay, Bonnie J. and James M. Acheson, eds., 1987,The Question of the Commons: The Culture and Ecology of Communal Property. Tucson, University of Arizona Press.
Ministerio da Agricultura, 1988, Alteracao da Cobertura Vegetal Natural do Estado do Acre. Brasilia, Min. da Agric./IBDF.
Mitchell, H. L., 1979,Mean Things Happening in this Land. Montclair, NJ, Allenheld, Osmun.
Moran, E. F., 1989, “Adaptation and Maladaptation in Newly Settled Areas,” Pp. 20–39 in D. A. Schumann and W. L. Partridge (eds.),The Human Ecology of Tropical Land Settlement in Latin America. Boulder, Westview.
Netting, R. M., 1981,Balancing on an Alp: Ecological Change and Continuity in a Swiss Mountain Community. London, Cambridge University Press.
Ostrom, Elinor, 1990,Governing the Commons. New York, Cambridge University Press.
Parfit, Michael, 1989, “Whose Hands Will Shape the Future of the Amazon's Green Mansions?”Smithsonian, November, pp. 58–74.
Peluso, Nancy, 1989, “The Rattan Trade in East Kalimantan, Indonesia: Can Extraction be Reserved?” Paper presented at Symposium on “Extractive Economies in Tropical Forests: A Course of Action,” at National Wildlife Federation, Washington, DC.
Peters, C. M., A. H. Gentry, and R. O. Mendelsohm, 1989, “Valuation of an Amazonian Rainforest.”Nature 339, pp. 655–56.
Record of Decision, 1986, Final Environmental Impact Statement and Land and Resource Management Plan. U. S. Department of Agriculture/U. S. Forest Service, Washington, DC.
Rowley, William D., 1985, UnitedStates Forest Service Grazing and Rangelands. College Station, Texas A & M University Press.
Salamon, Lester, 1974, “The Time Dimension in Policy Evaluation: The Case of the New Deal Land Reform Experiments.” Paper presented at Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, Chicago.
Schwartzman, Stephan, 1989a, “Extractive Reserves: Distribution of Wealth and the Social Costs of Frontier Development in the Amazon.” Paper presented to National Wildlife Federation/World Wildlife Fund/Conservation Foundation Symposium, “Extractive Economies in Tropical Forests: A Course of Action.” (Nov. 30-Dec. 1) Washington, DC.
--, 1989b, “Extractive Reserves: The Rubber Tappers' Strategy for Sustainable Use of the Amazon Rainforest.” Pp. 150–165 in J. O. Browder (ed.),Fragile Lands of Latin America. Boulder, Westview.
Schwartzman, S. and M. H. Allegretti, 1987, “Extractive Production in the Amazon and the Rubber Tappers' Movement.” Paper commissioned by the Environmental Defense Fund, Washington, DC.
Shaw, Paul, Jr., 1969, Land Classification Study New York. USFS-United States Department of Agriculture. Montour Falls, New York.
--, 1965, Report on A Study of the Hector Land Use Area, New York (NUY-LU-21), Preliminary Draft (Nov. 2) Forest Service, U. S. Dept. of Agriculture, Montour Falls, NY.
Short, C.G., 1989,Ronald Reagan and the Public Lands: America's Conservation Debate, 1979–1984. College Station, Texas A&M.
Silberling, Louise, 1992, “Social Movements and Successful Common Property Regimes: The Case of Brazilian Rubber Tappers.” Unpublished Masters Thesis. Ithaca, Cornell University.
Smith, D.J. and C. R. Smith, 1991, “Henslow's Sparrow and Grasshopper Sparrow: A Comparison of Habitat Use in finger Lakes National Forest, New York.”Bird Observer 20, pp. 187–193.
Snyder, Darwin, 1961, “A Study of the Pasture Aspects of the Hector Land Use Areas in Southern New York.” Unpublished Masters Thesis. Cornell University, Ithaca, NY.
Sparks, Samantha, 1989, “Labor Rights and Ecology in the Rain Forest.”Multinational Monitor 3, pp. 26–27.
Tangley, Laura, 1988, “Research Priorities for Conservation.”BioScience 38, pp. 444–48.
Thiesenhusen, Wm. and Jolyne Melmed-Sanjak, 1990, “Brazil's Agrarian Structure: Changes from 1970–1990.”World Development 18: 3, pp. 393–415.
USDA/FLNF, 1979,Preliminary Land Use Plan. U. S. Forest Service: Montour Falls, NY.
USDA/FLNF, 1986, Land and Resource Management Plan. Finger Lakes National Forest. U. S. Department of Agriculture/U. S. Forest Service. Washington, DC.
Weinstein, Barbara, 1983,The Amazon Rubber Boom, 1985–1920. Stanford, The Stanford University Press.
Wooten, H. H., 1965,The Land Utilization Program, 1934 to 1964. Ag. Econ. Report No. 85, Economic Research Service, USDA, Washington, DC.
World Commission on the Environment and Development, 1987,Our Common Future. New York, Oxford.
Additional information
Charles Geisler is an associate professor of rural sociology at Cornell University. He works on issues of land ownership, use, and reform in the United States and Latin America, on the integration of human livelihoods into parks and protected areas, and on the social impact assessment of resource development on rural peoples.
Louise Silberling is a doctoral candidate in development sociology at Cornell University. Research interests include extractive reserves, common property regimes, the role of social movements in resource management and land use planning. Her recent work has been in the Alto Jurua, Acre, with the National Council of Rubber Tappers and the Alliance of the Peoples of the Forest.
Research support for this paper is gratefully acknowledged from Hatch Project No. 550, College of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Cornell University for field work in New York and from the Conservation and Research Foundation of New London, CT for Silberling's 1989 research in Brazil.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Geisler, C., Silberling, L. Extractive reserves as alternative land reform: Amazonia and appalachia compared. Agric Hum Values 9, 58–70 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02217921
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02217921