Skip to main content
Log in

Why are there no objective values?

A critique of ethical intuitionism from an epistemological point of view

  • Articles
  • Published:
Journal for General Philosophy of Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Using the mathematical frameworks of economic preference ranking, subjective probability, and rational learning through empirical evidence, the epistemological implications of teleological ethical intuitionism are pointed out to the extent to which the latter is based on cognitivist and objectivist concepts of value. The notions of objective value and objective norm are critically analysed with reference to epistemological criteria of intersubjectively shared valuative experience. It is concluded that one cannot meaningfully postulate general material theories of morality that could be tested, confirmed or refuted by intersubjective empirical evidence of preferences and values, however loosely the empirical evidence of values may be interpreted. This situation is explained with reference to the ways in which preceived values become systematically influenced by the concomitants of individual valuative experience, but which have nothing to do with contingent subjective interests.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alexander, R. D.: 1987,Biology of Moral Systems, de Gruyter, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Åqvist, L.: 1987,Introduction to Deontic Logic and the Theory of Normative Systems, Bibliopolis, Naples.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brandt, R. B.: 1959,Ethical Theory, Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs.

    Google Scholar 

  • Broad, C. D.: 1930,Five Types of Ethical Theory, Routledge and Kegan Paul, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, R. and Sowden, L. (Eds.): 1985:Paradoxes of Rationality and Cooperation, University of British Columbia Press, Vancouver.

    Google Scholar 

  • Danielsson, S.: 1968,Preference and Obligation, Filosofiska föreningen, Uppsala.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eibl-Eibesfeldt, I.: 1984,Die Biologie des menschlichen Verhaltens, Piper, München (Engl. transl.: 1989,Human Ethology, Aldine-de Gruyter, Hawthorne, N. Y.).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ewing, A. C.: 1952, ‘A Suggested Non-Naturalist Analysis of Good’, in W. Sellars and J. Hospers (Eds.),Readings in Ethical Theory, Appleton, New York, pp. 231–249.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fetzer, J. H.: 1981,Scientific Knowledge, Reidel, Dordrecht.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Fine, T. L.: 1973,Theories of Probability, Academic Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Finetti, B. de: 1937, ‘La Prévision: ses lois logiques, ses sources subjectives’,Annales de l'Institut Henri Poincaré 7, 1–68. (Engl. transl.: 1964, ‘Foresight: Its Logical Laws, Its Subjective Sources’, in H. E. Kyburg and H. E. Smokler (Eds.),Studies in Subjective Probability, Wiley, New York, pp. 93–158).

    Google Scholar 

  • Føllesdal, D. and Hilpinen. R.: 1971, ‘Deontic Logic: An Introduction’ in R. Hilpinen (Ed.),Deontic Logic: Introductory and Systematic Readings, Reidel, Dordrecht, pp. 1–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fraassen, B. van: 1972, ‘The Logic of Conditional Obligation’,Journal of Philosophical Logic 1, 417–438.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frankena, W.K.: 1963,Ethics, Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geiger, G.: 1992, ‘Why there are no Objective Values: A Critique of Ethical Intuitionism from an Evolutionary Point of View’,Biology and Philosophy 7, 315–330.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Geiger, G.: 1993, ‘Evolutionary Anthropology and the Non-Cognitive Foundation of Moral Validity’,Biology and Philosophy 8, 133–151.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goldman, A. H.: 1988,Moral Knowledge, Routledge, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gruter, M. and Bohannan, P. (Eds.): 1983,Law, Biology and Culture, Ross-Erikson, Santa Barbara.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hare, R. M.: 1952,The Language of Morals, Oxford University Press, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harsanyi, J. C.: 1953, ‘Cardinal Utility in Welfare Economics and the Theory of Risk-Taking’,Journal of Political Economy 61, 434–435.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harsanyi, J. C.: 1976,Essays on Ethics, Social Behavior and Scientific Explanation, Reidel, Dordrecht.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hilpinen, R. (Ed.): 1971,Deontic Logic: Introductory and Systematic Readings, Reidel, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Honderich, T. (Ed.): 1985,Morality and Objectivity, Routledge and Kegan Paul, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hooker, C. A.: 1987,A Realistic Theory of Science, State University of New York Press, Albany.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, O. A.: 1966,Moral Knowledge, Nijhoff, The Hague.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kanger, S.: 1971, ‘New Foundations of Ethical Theory’, in R. Hilpinen (Ed.),Deontic Logic: Introductory and Systematic Readings, Reidel, Dordrecht, pp. 36–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan, S., and Garrick, B. J.: 1981, ‘On the Quantitative Definition of Risk’,Risk Analysis 1, 11–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kemeny, J. G., and Snell, J. L.: 1962,Mathematical Models in the Social Sciences, Blaisdell, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krantz, D. H., Luce, R. D., Suppes, P., and Tversky, A.: 1971,Foundations of Measurement Vol. I, Academic Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuhn, T.: 1962,The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, Chicago University Press, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kutschera, F. von: 1973,Einführung in die Logik der Normen, Werte und Entscheidungen, Alber, Freiburg.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kutschera, F. von: 1974, ‘Normative Präferenzen und bedingte Grebote’, in H. Lenk (Ed.),Normenlogik, Verlag Dokumentation, Pullach bei München, pp. 137–165.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kutschera, F. von: 1981,Grundfragen der Erkenntnistheorie, de Gruyter, Berlin.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kutschera, F. von: 1982,Grundlagen der Ethik, de Gruyter, Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kyburg, H. E., and Smokler, H. E. (Ed.): 1964,Studies in Subjective Probability, Wiley, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lenzen, W.: 1983, ‘On the Representation of Classificatory Value Structures’,Theory and Decision 15, 349–369.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, D. K.: 1973,Counterfactuals, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lorenz, K.: 1963,Das sogenannte Böse, Borotha-Schoeler, Wien. (Engl. transl.: 1967,On Aggression, Bantam, New York.)

    Google Scholar 

  • Lorenz, K.: 1964, ‘Moral-analoges Verhaltes der Tiere — Erkenntnisse heutiger Verhaltensforschung’,Universitas 19, 43–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luce, R. D., and Raiffa, H.: 1957,Games and Decions, Wiley, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Machina, M. J.: 1987, ‘Decision-Making in the Presence of Risk’,Science 236, 537–543.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mackie, J. L.: 1977,Ethics: Inventing Right and Wrong, Penguin, Harmondsworth.

    Google Scholar 

  • NcNaughton, D.: 1988,Moral Vision: An Introduction to Ethics, Blackwell, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mohr, H.: 1987,Natur und Moral: Ethik in der Biologie, Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft, Darmstadt.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore, G. E.: 1903,Principia Ethica, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore, G. E.: 1912,Ethics, Williams and Norgate, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neumann, J. von, and Morgenstern, O.: 1953 (3rd ed.),Theory of Games and Economic Behavior, Princeton University Press, Princeton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rapoport, A.: 1960,Fights, Games and Debates, University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rawls, J.: 1971,A Theory of Justice, Belknap, Cambridge, Mass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rescher, N.: 1983,Risk: A Philosophical Introduction to Risk Evaluation and Management, Wiley, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, F. S.: 1976,Discrete Mathematical Models, Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ross, D. W.: 1930,The Right and the Good, Clarendon, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rowe, W. D.: 1977,An Anatomy of Risk, Wiley, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruse, M.: 1986,Taking Darwin Seriously, Blackwell, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Savage, L. J.: 1954,The Foundations of Statistics, Wiley, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sidgwick, H.: 1874,The Methods of Ethics, Macmillan, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sinnott-Armstrong, W.: 1988,Moral Dilemmas, Blackwell, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smart, J. J. C.: 1973, ‘An Outline of a System of Utilitarian Ethics’, in J. J. C. Smart and B. Williams,Utilitarianism: For and Against, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 3–74.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Spohn, W.: 1978,Grundlagen der Entscheidungstheorie, Scriptor, Kronberg.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stegmüller, W.: 1973,Probleme und Resultate der Wissenschaftstheorie und Analytischen Philosophie Band IV/2, Springer, Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stent, G. S. (Ed.): 1978,Morality as a Biological Phenomenon, Dahlem Konferenzen (Abakon Verlagsgesellschaft), Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strawson, P. F.: 1949, ‘Ethical Intuitionism’,Philosophy 24, 23–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wright, G. H. von: 1968,An Essay in Deontic Logic and the General Theory of Action, North Holland, Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Geiger, G. Why are there no objective values?. J Gen Philos Sci 26, 35–62 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01130925

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01130925

Key words

Navigation