Abstract
Darwin’s Conjecture is a bold attempt to bring evolutionary explanation to the social sciences, particularly economics. The book outlines the history of Darwinian explanation in social science then puts forward a generalized replicator account of social evolution by natural selection. The authors identify habits and routines as examples of the generative replicators necessary in order that social evolution is Darwinian. This reviewer notes that the replicator approach limits the generality of this account and suggests that habits and routines might better be seen as members of a Darwinian population in the tradition of Godfrey-Smith’s (2009) generalized account of natural selection instead. Furthermore, the existence of levels of social evolution will constrain what evolution can occur low in the hierarchy.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Charlton M (2009) Identifying iron production lineages: a case study in Northwest Wales. In: Shennan S (ed) Pattern and process in cultural evolution. University of California Press, Berkeley
Cziko G (1995) Without miracles: universal selection theory and the second Darwinian revolution. MIT Press, Cambridge
Darwin F (ed) (1887) Life and letters of Charles Darwin, vol 3. John Murray, London
Dawkins R (1976) The selfish gene. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Dennett D (1995) Darwin’s dangerous idea. Simon & Schuster, New York
Godfrey-Smith P (2000) The replicator in retrospect. Biol Philos 15:403–423
Godfrey-Smith P (2009) Darwinian populations and natural selection. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Hull D (1980) Individuality and selection. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 11:311–332
Lake M, Venti J (2009) Quantitative analysis of macroevolutionary patterning in technological evolution: bicycle design from 1800 to 2000. In: Shennan S (ed) Pattern and process in cultural evolution. University of California Press, Berkeley
Lewontin, R (1980) Adaptation. In: Levins R, Lewontin R (eds) The dialectical biologist. Cambridge: Havard University Press (Reprinted)
Lock A, Gers M (2011) The cultural evolution of written language and its effects: a Darwinian process from prehistory to the modern day. In: Grigorenko E (ed) Handbook of writing: a mosaic of perspectives and views. Psychology Press. http://www.wisepress.com/index.asp-Q-I-E-9781848728127-writing-a-mosaic-of-newperspectives,381773
Maynard Smith J, Szathmary E (1995) The major transitions in evolution. WH Freeman Press, Oxford
Morgan C (1896) Habit and instinct. Edward Arnold, London
Richerson P, Boyd R (2005) Not by genes alone: how culture transformed human evolution. University of Chicago Press, Chicago
Ritchie D (1896) Social evolution. Int J Ethics 6(2):165–181
Shennan S (ed) (2009) Pattern and process in cultural evolution. University of California Press, Berkeley
Sperber D (2000) An objection to the memetic approach to culture. In: Aunger R (ed) Darwinizing culture: the status of memetics as a science. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Sterelny K (2001) Niche construction, developmental systems, and the extended replicator. In: Oyama S, Griffiths P, Gray R (2003). Cycles of contingency: developmental systems and evolution. MIT Press
Sterelny K (2006) Memes revisited. Br J Philos Sci 57:145–165
Veblen T (1899) The theory of the leisure class: An economic study in the evolution of institutions. Macmillan, New York
Wimsatt W, Griesemer J (2007) Reproducing entrenchments to scaffold culture. In: Sansom R, Brandon R (eds) Integrating evolution and development: from theory to practice. MIT Press, Cambridge
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Gers, M. Overqualified: generative replicators as Darwinian reproducers. Biol Philos 27, 595–605 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10539-011-9281-3
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10539-011-9281-3