Abstract
Formulated as a common conceptual ground for all democracies, Popper's notion of the open society sprang from the mid-20th century context that demonstrated democracy's vulnerability to hijacking through its own electoral mechanisms. Popper's concept may accordingly be considered as a resource for combatting the populist appeal to majority decision and its threat of diminishing individual and minority rights. I examine the affirmative and critical aspects of such a consideration. On the affirmative side, the open-society concept allows room for both majority decision and the rights of individuals and minorities, as well as for particular group identities and class demands, showing that they may all cooperate to facilitate the growth of liberty, knowledge and the quality of life. Democratic institutions are justified from the grounds of this concept. Populism's equation of democracy with majority decision is, thus, incompatible with democracy's essence: decision by majority exists to cater to the vision that justifies that mode of decision making itself and cannot stay legitimate if it scuttles that vision. The more critical interpretation focuses on a detail of the open society's projected development. Popper tasks democracy's institutions with assuring conditions for progress through the expansion of knowledge. Popper expects the same process to modify the civic sphere's scope and content, as political bodies will be increasingly exposed to the expanding insights of scholarship and science. This anticipation involves grading the agents engaged in these two respective spheres, as well as looking forward to the ascendancy of one of them. Accordingly, the open-society concept might validate claims that, when seeking to confine the scope of majority decision through an emphasis on rights and law, constitutionalist and liberal approaches to democracy are subtly elitist.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abts, K. and Rummens, S. (2007) Populism versus democracy. Political Studies 55(2): 405–424.
Acemoglu, D., Egorov, G. and Sonin, K. (2013) A political theory of populism. The Quarterly Journal of Economics 128(2): 771–805.
Albertazzi, D, and McDonnell, D. (2008) Introduction: The sceptre and the spectre. In D. Albertazzi, D and D. McDonnell (eds.), Twenty-first century populism. Houndmills and New York: Palgrave MacMillan, pp. 1–11.
Alston, P. (2017) The populist challenge to human rights. Journal of Human Rights Practice 9(1): 1–15.
Arditi, B. (2003) Populism, or, politics at the edges of democracy. Contemporary Politics 9(1): 17–31.
Aslanidis, P. (2016) Is populism an ideology? A refutation and a new perspective. Political Studies 64(1): 88–104.
Bednář, M. (2009) Open society and the European Union. In Z. Parusniková and R.S. Cohen (eds.) Rethinking Popper. Springer, pp. 237–244.
Bligh, G. (2014) Defending democracy: A new understanding of the party-banning phenomenon. Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law 46(5): 1321–1379.
Boyer, A. (2005) Is an open society a just society? Popper and Rawls. Learning for Democracy 1(2): 7–27.
Brubaker, R. (2017) Why populism? Theory and Society 46(5): 357–385.
Brubaker, R. (2020) Populism and nationalism. Nations and Nationalism 26(1): 44–66.
Caiani, M. and Graziano, P. (2019) Understanding varieties of populism in times of crises. West European Politics 42(6): 1141–1158.
Canovan, M. (1999) Trust the people! Populism and the two faces of democracy. Political Studies 47(1): 2–16.
Chapelan, A. (2020) Populist conservatism or conservative populism? The republican party, the new conservative revolution and the political education of Donald Trump. Perspective Politice 13(1–2): 8–19.
Corvi, R. (1997) An Introduction to the Thought of Karl Popper. London and New York: Routledge.
De Cleen, B. and Stavrakakis, Y. (2020) How should we analyze the connections between populism and nationalism: A response to Rogers Brubaker. Nations and Nationalism 26(2): 314–322.
Eidlin, F. (1993) Popper and democratic theory. Studies in Political Thought 2(1): 69–84.
Gagnon, J.P., Beausoleil, E., Son, K.M., Arguelles, C., Chalaye, P. and Johnston, C.N. (2018) What is populism? Who is the populist? Democratic Theory 5(2): vi.
Gaus, G. (2016) Tyranny of the Ideal. Princeton NJ: Princeton University Press.
Gerson, G. (2019) Nationality in the open society: Popper versus Hayes and Kohn. Nations and Nationalism 25(1): 208–228.
Hacohen, M.H. (2000) Karl Popper – The Formative Years, 1920–1945. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Jordaan, D.W. (2017) The open society: What does it really mean? De Jure 15: 396–405.
Laclau, E. (2007) On Populist Reason. London: Verso.
Lasch, C. (1991) The True and Only Heaven. New York: Norton.
Lasch, C. (1995) The Revolt of the Elites. New York: Norton.
Lessnoff, M. (1980) The political philosophy of Karl Popper. British Journal of Political Science 10(1): 99–120.
Locke, J. (2010) A Letter Concerning Toleration and Other Writings. In M. Goldie (ed.) Indianapolis: Liberty Fund.
Mavrozacharakis, E. (2018) Populism and democracy: An ambiguous relationship. European Quarterly of Political Attitudes and Mentalities 7(4): 19–35.
Maxwell, N. (2017) Karl Popper: Science and Enlightenment. London: UCL Press.
Mill, J.S. (1977) Collected works v. XIX. In J.M. Robson (ed.). Toronto: Toronto University Press.
Moffitt, B. (2016) The Global Rise of Populism: Performance, Political Style, and Representation. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
Morgenthau, H.J. (1946) Scientific Man Versus Power Politics. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
Mudde, C. (2004) The Populist Zeitgeist. Government and Opposition 39(4): 541–563.
Mudde, C. (2017) Populism: An ideational approach. In C.R. Kaltwasser, P. Taggart, O. Espejo and P. Ostiguy (eds.) The Oxford Handbook of Populism. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 27–47.
Mudde, C. and Kaltwasser Rovira, C. (2017) Populism: A Very Short Introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Müller, J.-W. (2018) How can populism be defeated? In M. Ignatieff and S. Roch (eds.) Rethinking Open Society. Budapest and New York: CEU Press, pp. 195–210.
Pappas, T.S. (2019) Populism and Liberal Democracy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Pickel, A. (1989) Never ask who should rule: Karl Popper and political theory. Canadian Journal of Political Science/revue Canadienne De Science Politique 22(1): 83–105.
Popper, K.R. (1965) Conjectures and Refutations. New York: Harper.
Popper, K.R. (1966) The Open Society and Its Enemies. Princeton NJ: Princeton University Press.
Popper, K.R. (2008) After the Open Society. In: J. Shearmur and Piers N. Turner. London: Routledge
Popper, K.R. (1972) The Logic of Scientific Discovery. London: Hutchinson.
Popper, K.R. (1979) Objective Knowledge. Clarendon.
Popper, K.R. (1992) In Search of a Better World. London: Routledge.
Rancière, J. (2014) Hatred of Democracy. London, UK: Verso Books.
Ricci, D.M. (1984) The Tragedy of Political Science. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Richards, B. (2019) Beyond the angers of populism: A psychosocial inquiry. Journal of Psychosocial Studies 12(1–2): 171–183.
Rijkpkema, B. (2012) Popper’s paradox of democracy. Think 11(32): 93–96.
Rodrik, D. (2018) Populism and the economics of globalization. Journal of International Business Policy 1(1): 12–33.
Rosenboim, O. (2017) The Emergence of Globalism. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Rummens, S. (2017) Populism as a threat to liberal democracy. In C.R. Kaltwasser, P. Taggart, P.O. Espejo and P. Ostiguy (eds.) The Oxford Handbook of Populism. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 554–570.
Saffon, M.P. and Urbinati, N. (2013) Procedural democracy, the bulwark of equal liberty. Political Theory 41(3): 441–481.
Shearmur, J. (2016) Poppers politics and political thought. In J. Shearmur and G. Stokes (eds.) The Cambridge Companion to Popper. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 352–376.
Simkin, C. (1993) Poppers Views on Natural and Social Science. Leiden: Brill.
Stanley, B. (2008) The thin ideology of populism. Journal of Political Ideologies 13(1): 95–110.
Stokes, G. (1998) Popper. Cambridge: Polity.
Stokes, G. (2006) Karl Popper’s revisionist/realist theory of democracy. In I. Jarvie, K. Milford and D. Miller (eds.) Karl Popper: A Centenary Assessment v. I. Burlington, VT: Ashgate, pp. 217–230.
Taguieff, P.-A. (1995) Political science confronts Populism: From a conceptual mirage to a real problem. Telos 20: 9–43.
Thrasher, J. and Vallier, K. (2018) Political stability in the open society. American Journal of Political Science 62(2): 398–409.
Urbinati, N. (2019a) Liquid parties, dense populism. Philosophy & Social Criticism 45(9–10): 1069–1083.
Urbinati, N. (2019b) Political theory of populism. Annual Review of Political Science 22(1): 111–127.
Vincent, A. (2005) Nationalism and the open society. Theoria 107: 36–64.
Vittori, D. (2017) Re-conceptualizing populism: Bringing a multifaceted concept within stricter borders. Revista Española De Ciencia Política 44: 43–65.
Weinstein, D. and Zakai, A. (2017) Jewish Exiles and European Thought in the Shadow of the Third Reich: Baron, Popper, Straus, Auerbach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Wiles, P. (1969) A syndrome, not a doctrine: Some elementary theses on populism. In G. Ionescu and E. Gellner (eds.) Populism: Its Meanings and National Characteristics. Weidenfeld and Nicolson, pp. 166–179.
Wolkenstein, F. (2015) What can we hold against populism? Philosophy & Social Criticism 41(2): 111–129.
Wolkenstein, F. (2019) Populism, liberal democracy and the ethics of peoplehood. European Journal of Political Theory 18(3): 330–348.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Gerson, G. The open society and the challenge of populism: Solution and problem. Contemp Polit Theory 22, 529–551 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1057/s41296-022-00609-x
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41296-022-00609-x