Skip to main content
Log in

Four relevant Gentzen systems

  • Published:
Studia Logica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper is a study of four subscripted Gentzen systems G u R +, G u T +, G u RW + and G u TW +. [16] shows that the first three are equivalent to the semilattice relevant logics u R +, u T + and u RW + and conjectures that G u TW + is, equivalent to u TW +. Here we prove Cut Theorems for these systems, and then show that modus ponens is admissible — which is not so trivial as one normally expects. Finally, we give decision procedures for the contractionless systems, G u TW + and G u RW +.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. S. Giambrone, Gentzen Systems and Decision Procedures for Relevant Logics, Australian National University Doctoral Dissertation, 1983.

  2. S. Giambrone and A. Urquhart, Proof theories for semilattice logics, Zeitshrift für Mathematische Logik und Grundlagen der Mathematik 33 (1987).

  3. A. Urquhart, Semantics for relevant logics, The Journal of Symbolic Logic 37 (1972), pp. 159–69.

    Google Scholar 

  4. , The Semantics of Entaliment, University of Pittsburgh Doctoral Dissertation, Ann Arbor (University Microfilms) 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  5. K. Fine, Completeness for the semi-lattice semantics (Abstract), The Journal of Symbolic Logic 41 (1976), p. 560.

    Google Scholar 

  6. G. Charlwood, An axiomatic version of positive semilattice relevance Logic, The Journal of Symbolic Logic 46 (1981), pp. 231–39.

    Google Scholar 

  7. A. Kron, Decision procedures for two positive relevance Logics, Reports on Mathematical Logic 10 (1978), pp. 61–78.

    Google Scholar 

  8. , Gentzen formulations of two positive relevance Logics, Studia Logica 39 (1980), pp. 381–403.

    Google Scholar 

  9. S. Giambrone, A critique of ‘Decision Procedures for Two Positive Relevance Logics’, Reports on Mathematical Logics 19.

  10. ..... On purported Gentzen formulations of two positive relevant Logics, Studia Logica 44.

  11. J. M. Dunn, Consecution formulation of positive R with cotenability and t, in A.R. Anderson and Nuel D. Belnap, Jr., Entailment: The Logic of Relevance and Necessity, Vol. 1, Princeton (Princeton University Press) 1975, pp. 381–91.

    Google Scholar 

  12. N. D. Belnap, Jr., A. Gupta and J. M. Dunn, A consecution calculus for positive relevant implication with necessity, Journal of Philosophical Logic 9 (1980), pp. 343–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. N. D. Belnap, Jr., Display Logic, Journal of Philosophical Logic 11 (1982), pp. 375–418.

    Google Scholar 

  14. S. Giambrone, RW + and TW + are decidable, Journal of Philosophical Logic 14 (1985), pp. 235–254.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. R. K. Meyer and M. McRobbie, Multisets and relevant implication, Australasian Journal of Philosophy 60 (1982), pp. 107–39 and 265–81.

    Google Scholar 

  16. S. Giambrone, R. K. Meyer and A. Urquhart, A contractionless semilattice semantics, forthcoming, in Journal of Symbolic Logic.

  17. G. Gentzen, Investigations into Logical deductions, in M. Szabo (ed.), The Collected Papers of Gerhard Gentzen, Amsterdam (North Holland) 1969.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Giambrone, S., Kron, A. Four relevant Gentzen systems. Stud Logica 46, 55–71 (1987). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00396905

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00396905

Keywords

Navigation