Skip to main content
Log in

Authorship hypotheses and reliability of informants

  • Published:
Studia Logica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  1. E. Bernheim:Lehrbuch der geschichtlichen Methode, Leipzig 1930, s. 231–233.

  2. E. Bernheim. op. cit.Lehrbuch der geschichtlichen Methode, Leipzig 1930, p. 227.

  3. Similar notation was used byH. S. Leonard in the article:Authorship and Purpose, “Philosophy of Science”, vol. 26, No. 4.

  4. M. Handelsman:Historyka, Warszawa 1928, p. 141.

  5. This is a summary of the example discussed byV. Goedecke inIntroduction to the theory of statistics, 1953, p. 214.

  6. The inferential scheme corresponding to this rule has been termed byZ. Czerwinski “the weakened modus tollendo tollens” in the articleOn the relation of statistical inference to traditional induction and deduction, Studia Logica, vol. 7, 1958.

  7. For the concepts of insensitiveness or freedom of random sequences seeK. R. Popper:The Logic of Scientific Discovery, pp. 153–163, especially p. 162.

  8. K. R. Popper:Philosophy of Science: Personal Report, British Philosophy in the Mid-Century, p. 187;The Aim of Science, Ratio, 1, 1957.The Open Society and its Enemies, 1957, vol. 2, p. 265.

  9. J. Giedymin:A Generalization of the Refutability Postulate, Studia Logica, vol. 10, 1960.

Download references

Authors

Additional information

Allatum est die 9 Decembris 1960

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Giedymin, J. Authorship hypotheses and reliability of informants. Stud Logica 12, 171–191 (1961). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02126834

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02126834

Keywords

Navigation