Skip to main content
Log in

Abstract

This article touches upon the significance of the traditional Chinese law in the Ancient times. It refers not only to Confucianism and legalism, but it also reveals some information about Daoism and its point of view on the Chinese legal system. The aim of this study is to provide a comprehensive semiotic analysis of the Chinese characters related to law and some philosophical insight into traditional Chinese legal system. The following study focuses primarily on presentation of different perspectives on law in Ancient China by giving some examples of law application and divergent judgments depending on Confucian and legalist thinking. The discourse presented in this study is centred on the traditional Chinese values and brings us to the final considerations about Chinese legal culture.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Alford, William P. Chinese law. Encyclopedia Britannica. https://www.britannica.com/topic/Chinese-law. Consulté le 15 Novembre 2019.

  2. Augustyniak, Ada. 2012. Kultura filozoficznej dysputy w starożytnych Chinach. The Polish Journal of the Arts and Culture 3: 259–278.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Cao, Deborah. 2007. Translating Law. Clevedon-Buffalo-Toronto: Multilingual Matters Ltd.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  4. Chen, Frederic Tse-shyang. 1991. The Confucian View of World Order. Indiana International & Comparative Law Review 1: 45–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Dąbrowski, Przemysław. 2012. Myśl polityczno-prawna starożytnych Chin – próba syntezy. Gdańskie Studia Azji Wschodniej 2: 29–49.

    Google Scholar 

  6. De Grazia, Sebastian. 1980. The Dura Lex of Legalism and The First Empire. Comparative Civilizations Review 4: 59–76.

    Google Scholar 

  7. De Loynes de Fumichon, Bruno. 2013. Introduction au droit comparé. Comparative Law Journal of the Pacific 2: i-278.

  8. Feng, Yujun. 2010. Legal Culture in China: A Comparison to Western Law. Revue Juridique Polynesienne 16: 115–123.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Gaurier, Dominique. 1998. Le Droit, remède pour les barbares: la réception du droit dans la Chine ancienne. Revue Internationale des Droits de l’Antiquité XLV: 31–60.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Gény, François. 1922. Science et Technique en Droit Positif, vol. 1 :III. Paris: Recueil Sirey.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Gilissen, John. 1979. Introduction historique au droit. Bruxelles: Bruylant.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Goldin, Paul R. 2011. Persistent Misconceptions About Chinese “Legalism”. Journal of Chinese Philosophy 38(1): 88–104.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Lee-jan, Jan, and O. Cecilia. 1980. Crime and Punishment: Chinese Philosophies and Perspectives. American Journal of Criminal Justice 5(1): 1–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Kohn, Livia. 2001. Daoism and Chinese Culture. St. Petersburg: Three Pines Press.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Kość, Antoni. 1998. Prawo a etyka konfucjańska w historii myśli prawnej Chin. Lublin: Pracownia Poligraficzna przy Prywatnym Liceum Ogólnokształcącym.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Legalism. Encyclopedia Britannica. https://www.britannica.com/topic/Legalism. Consulté le 4 Novembre 2019.

  17. Liu, JeeLoo. 2010. Wprowadzenie do filozofii chińskiej. Od myśli starożytnej do chińskiego buddyzmu, [trad.] Mieczysław Godyń. Kraków: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Jagiellońskiego.

  18. MacCormack, Geoffrey. 2001. Mythology and the Origin of Law in Early Chinese Thought. Journal of Asian Legal History 1: 1–23.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Melkevik, Bjarne. 1996. Un regard sur la culture juridique chinoise: l’Ecole des légistes, le confucianisme et la philosophie du droit. Les Cahiers de Droit 37(3): 603–627.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Pan, Junwu. 2011. Chinese Philosophy and International Law. Asian Journal of International Law 1(2): 233–248.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. René, David, and Camille Jauffret-Spinosi. 2010. Los grandes sistemas jurídicos contemporáneo. México: UNAM.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Sadowski, Mirosław. 2004. Konfucjusz. Dans Leksykon myślicieli politycznych i prawnych, éds. Elżbieta Kundera, Marek Maciejewski, 246-248. Warszawa: C.H. Beck.

  23. Stępień, Mateusz. 2013. Chińska kultura prawna. Dans Leksykon socjologii prawa, éds. Anna Kociołek-Pęksa, Mateusz Stępień, 26–34. Warszawa: C.H. Beck.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Stępień, Mateusz. 2013. Spór konfucjanistów z legistami. W kręgu chińskiej kultury prawnej. Kraków: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Jagiellońskiego.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Tokarczyk, Roman. 2010. Współczesne kultury prawne. Warszawa: Wolters Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Wagner, Anne, Tracey Summerfield, et Farid Samir Benavides Vanegas (éds.). 2005. Contemporary Issues of the Semiotics of Law. Cultural and Symbolic Analyses of Law in a Global Context. Oxford-Portland: Hart Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Wang, Linghao, Solum Lawrence. 2012. Confucian Virtue Jurisprudence. Dans Law, Virtue and Justice, éds. Amalia Amaya, Ho Hock Lai. Oxford: Hart Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Wang, Shirong. 2007. Functions of Cases in Traditional Chinese Law. Frontiers of Law in China 2: 493–517.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Windrow, Hayden. 2006. A Short History of Law, Norms and Social Control in Imperial China. Asian-Pacific Law & Policy Journal 7(2): 244–301.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Zeidler, Kamil. 2010. Chińskie nauki o nauczaniu. Dans Chiny w oczach Polaków. Księga jubileuszowa z okazji 60-lecia nawiązania stosunków dyplomatycznych między Polską a Chińską Republiką Ludową, éds. Józef Włodarski, Kamil Zeidler, et Marceli Burdelski, 391–398. Gdańsk: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Gdańskiego.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Zeng, Xianyi, and Ma. Xiaohong. 2006. A Dialectic Study of the Structure and Basic Concepts of Traditional Chinese Law and an Analysis of the Relationship Between li (ceremony) and fa (law). Frontiers of Law in China 1: 34–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Zimmermann, James M. 2010. China Law Deskbook. A Legal Guide to Foreign-Invested Enterprises. Chicago: American Bar Association.

    Google Scholar 

  33. 俞荣根. 2016. 何谓“礼法”?. 孔学堂 4: 15–29.

  34. 俞荣根. 2014. 儒学正义论与中华法系. 法治研究1: 3–11.

  35. 俞荣根. 2010. 儒家法文化与中华法系. 法律文化研究1: 20–30.

  36. 俞荣根. 2015. 法治中国视阈下中华礼法传统之价值. 孔学堂 4(2): 11–21.

  37. 俞荣根. 2016. 礼法传统与良法善治. 暨南学报 (哲学社会科学版) 4: 53–63.

  38. 俞荣根. 2018. 超越儒法之争 ——礼法传统中的现代法治价值. 法治研究 5: 3–13.

  39. 刘吉昌,周骞. 略论儒家思想对中国传统法律的影响. 中牟县人民法院. http://www.hncourt.gov.cn/public/detail.php?id=152984. Consulté le 20 Mai 2020.

  40. 康民德. 2016. 儒家思想中的法律价值观. 24 10 2016. 人民法院报.

  41. 张师伟. 2005. 黄宗羲“天下之法”的法理分析. 中国社会历史评论 00: 357–367.

  42. 肖光辉. 2016. 法理学专题研究. 上海: 上海社会科学院出版社.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Magdalena Łągiewska.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Łągiewska, M. Droit Chinois Traditionnel: Vision des Confucianistes et Légistes. Int J Semiot Law 35, 479–492 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11196-020-09753-2

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11196-020-09753-2

Keywords

Navigation