Skip to main content
Log in

Commentary and criticism on scientific positivism

  • Comment
  • Published:
Science and Engineering Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  1. Coburn, W.W. (1994) “Comments and Criticism. Point: Belief, Understanding the Teaching of Evolution.”Journal of Research in Science Teaching 31, 583–590.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Garte, S. J. (1995) “Guidelines for Training in the Ethical Conduct of Scientific Research.”Science and Engineering Ethics 1, 59–70.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Good, R. & Schlagel, R. (1992, May) “Contextual Realism in Science and Science Teaching.” A paper presented at the Second International Conference on the History and Philosophy of Science and Science Teaching, Kingston, Ontario, Canada.

  4. Kuhn, T.S. (1970)The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, 2nd edition, The University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Shepherd, L. J. (1993)Lifting the Veil: The Feminine Face of Science, Shambhala, Boston.

    Google Scholar 

  6. von Glasersfeld, E. (1989) “Cognition, Construction of Knowledge and Teaching.”Synthese 80, 121–140.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Ed. Note: In keeping with the editors’ policy to encourage the presentation of different viewpoints, this invited comment piece should be read in conjunction with the preceding paper by S. J. Garte, pp. 59–70.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gilmer, P.J. Commentary and criticism on scientific positivism. Sci Eng Ethics 1, 71–72 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02628699

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02628699

Keywords

Navigation