Skip to main content
Log in

Countering the Vices: On the Neglected Side of Character Education

  • Published:
Studies in Philosophy and Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Following the rise of virtue and character education, educational philosophers have recently given much attention to questions relating to virtue and the good. This, however, has not been paralleled by a similar interest in vice and evil, which, in this context, are examined only rarely. In this article, I use the work of the American philosopher John Kekes as a backdrop for discussing the role coping with vice and evil should play in virtue and character education. I show how Kekes’ assumptions that people have natural inclinations towards both virtue and vice and that evil and vice are an inevitable part of human existence lead to the idea that character education should explicitly discuss not only the virtues but also the vices, that it should promote self-control and that it should bring people to recognize that they have mixed moral inclinations. I then argue that even if we reject Kekes’ key assumptions, embracing these three ideas that attempt to provide means to counter the vices might still have marked benefits for character education. The article concludes by suggesting that while the ideas that stem from Kekes’ approach should not necessarily be embraced, the themes that they raise call for greater consideration and further analysis.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Since the middle-ages the term vice is often used instead of the word sin to describe immoral acts of commission or omission (Schimmel 1992, 14). In this article, however, the original Greek and Roman understanding of vice will be kept. The term vice will refer only to immoral character traits or immoral tendencies and not to immoral acts.

  2. For a more systematic discussion of Kekes' view of education see Kekes' "Pluralism, Moral Imagination and Moral Education" (Kekes 1999). There, however, Kekes does not discuss questions relating to evil.

  3. For an interesting discussion of the nature of evil and present views regarding the idea of privation see: Kane (1980), Anglin and Goetz (1982).

  4. For Kekes’ criticism of current moral perceptions see chapters 5–7 in the book.

References

  • Anglin, B., & Goetz, S. (1982). Evil is privation. International Journal for Philosophy of Religion, 13(1), 3–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baumeister, R. F., & Heatherton, T. F. (1996). Self-regulation failure: An overview. Psychological Inquiry, 7(1), 1–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benner, D., & English, A. (2004). Critique and negativity: Towards the pluralisation of critique in educational practice, theory and research. Journal of Philosophy of Education, 38(3), 409–430.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blasi, A. (2005). Moral character—A psychological approach. In D. K. Lapsley & F. K. Power (Eds.), Character psychology and character education (pp. 67–100). Indiana: University of Notre Dame Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Card, C. (2002). The atrocity paradigm: A theory of evil. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Card, C. (2010). Confronting evils—Terrorism, torture, genocide. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carr, D. (1991). Educating the virtues: An essay on the philosophical psychology of moral development and education. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cole, P. (2006). The myth of evil: Demonizing the enemy. Westport: Pareger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cunningham, C. A. (2005). A certain and reasoned—The rise and fall of character education in America. In D. K. Lapsley & F. K. Power (Eds.), Character psychology and character education (pp. 166–201). Indiana: University of Notre Dame Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dews, P. (2008). The idea of evil. Malden: Blackwell.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hirschi, T. (2004). Self-control and crime. In R. F. Baumeister & K. D. Vohs (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation—Research, theory, and applications (pp. 537–552). New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ihara, C. K. (1992). Book review—Facing evil. Ethics, 102(3), 650–655.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kane, S. (1980). Evil and privation. International Journal for Philosophy of Religion, 11(1), 43–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kekes, J. (1988). The Examined Life. Pennsylvania: Bucknell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kekes, J. (1989). Moral tradition and individuality. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kekes, J. (1990). Facing evil. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kekes, J. (1999). Pluralism, moral imagination and moral education. In M. Halstead & T. H. McLaughlin (Eds.), Education in morality (pp. 167–184). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacIntyre, A. (2007). After virtue—A study in moral theory. London: Duckworth.

    Google Scholar 

  • Manent, P. (1998). The city of man. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mckinnon, C. (1999). Character, virtue theories and the vices. Ontario: Broadview Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Midgley, M. (1984). Wickedness—A philosophical essay. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Milo, R. D. (1984). Immorality. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murdoch, I. (1970). The sovereignty of the good. London: Routledge and K. Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Norton, A. (2004). On evil. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nucci, L. (2005). Preface. In L. Nucci (Ed.), Conflict, contradiction, and contrarian elements in moral development and education (pp. 7–14). New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oser, F. K. (1996). Learning from negative morality. Journal of Moral Education, 25(1), 67–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oser, F. K. (2005). Negative morality and the goals of moral education. In L. Nucci (Ed.), Conflict, contradiction and contrarian elements in moral development and education (pp. 129–153). New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parker, D. (2007). The self in the moral space—Life narrative and the good. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rustin, M. (1997). Innate morality: A psychoanalytic approach to moral education. In R. Smith & P. Standish (Eds.), Teaching right and wrong: Moral education in the balance (pp. 75–91). London: Trentham Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schimmel, S. (1992). The seven deadly sins: Jewish, Christian and classical reflections on human nature. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Statman, D. (1997). Introduction to virtue ethics. In D. Statman (Ed.), Virtue ethics a critical reader (pp. 1–42). Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steutel, J. (1997). The virtue approach to moral education: Some conceptual clarifications. Journal of Philosophy of Education, 31(3), 395–407.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steutel, J. (1999). The virtues of will power: Self control and deliberation. In D. Carr & J. Steutel (Eds.), Virtue ethics and moral education (pp. 129–142). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steutel, J., & Carr, D. (1999). Virtue ethics and the virtue approach to moral education. In D. Carr & J. Steutel (Eds.), Virtue ethics and moral education (pp. 3–19). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, C. (1989). Sources of the self—The making of modern identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ver Eecke, W. (2006). Denial, negation, and the forces of the negative—Freud, Hegel, Lacan, Spitz, and Sophocles. Albany: State University of New York Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vetlesen, A. J. (2005). Evil and human agency: Understanding collective evildoing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Von Wright, G. H. (1963). The varieties of goodness. London: Routledge and K. Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wringe, C. (2006). Moral education—Beyond the teaching of right and wrong. Dordrecht: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tal Gilead.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gilead, T. Countering the Vices: On the Neglected Side of Character Education. Stud Philos Educ 30, 271–284 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11217-011-9223-1

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11217-011-9223-1

Keywords

Navigation