Skip to main content
Log in

On two AI traditions

  • Published:
AI & SOCIETY Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

To understand the role of expert systems as a medium for transferring knowledge and skills within organisations requires an understanding of the nature of expertise within working life contexts. Central to this issue of transfer is the debate on the nature of tacit/implicit knowledge and the problem of formalising it in explicit form. This paper considers the British approach to the development of knowledge-based systems, which is regarded as being predominantly rationalistic, and compares it with the Scandinavian approach, which is regarded as being predominantly humanistic. The paper proposes that crucial to the debate on the transfer of knowledge and skills is the development of expert systems as communications media which aims at enhancing and sharing the knowledge and skills of users. A human-centred approach for the future is proposed which brings the above two traditions together thereby providing a developmental framework for knowledge based systems.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Alvey Annual Report (1987). London.

  2. Barrett, W. (1987).Death of the Soul: From Descartes to the Computer. Doubleday, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Beniger, J. (1986).The Control Revolution: Technological and Economic Origins of the Information Society. Harvard Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Bramer, M. (1988). Expert Systems in Business: A British Perspective,Expert Systems Journal. 5,2.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Chomsky, N. (1975).Reflections on Language. Pantheon, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Collins, H.M. (1987). Expert Systems, Artificial Intelligence and the Behavioural Coordinates of Skill, in Bloomfield (ed.)The Question of Artificial Intelligence. Croom Helm Ltd.

  7. Cooley, M. (1987). Human Centred Systems: An Urgent Problem for Systems Designers,AI & Society. 1,1.

  8. Cooley, M,. (1987).Architect or Bee? The Human Price of Technology. Hogarth Press, London. New extended edition.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Dreyfus, L and S.E Dreyfus (1986).Mind Over Machine: The Power of Human Intuition and Expertise in the Era of Computers. New York Press.

  10. Ehn, Pelle (1988).Work-Oriented Design of Computer Artifacts. Arbetslivscentrum, Stockholm.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Ennals, R. (1987). Socially Useful Artificial Intelligence,AI & Society. 1,1.

  12. Ennals, R. (1988).Pedagogical Aspects of Multicultural Information Technology.

  13. Feigenbaum, E.A. and P. McCorduck (1984).The Fifth Generation. Michael Joseph, London.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Gill, K.S. (1986). Knowledge Based Machine: Issues of Knowledge Transfer, in Gill (ed.)Artificial Intelligence for Society. John Wiley and Sons, Chichester.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Gill, K.S. (1988). Artificial Intelligence and Social Action: Education and Training, in Göranzon and Josefson (eds)Knowledge, Skill and Artificial Intelligence. Springer-Verlag.

  16. Gill, K.S. and D. Smith (1988). Internal Working Paper, SEAKE Centre.

  17. Göranzon, B. (1987). The Practice of the Use of Computers,AI & Society. 1,1.

  18. Göranzon, B. and I. Josefson (eds) (1988).Knowledge, Skill and Artificial Intelligence. Springer-Verlag.

  19. Gullers, P. (1988). Automation-Skill-Practice, in Göranzon and Josefson (eds)Knowledge, Skill and Artificial Intelligence. Springer-Verlag.

  20. Guy, K. (1987).A Review of the Alvey Intelligent Knowledge-Based Systems (IKBS) Programme. Science Policy Research Unit, SPRU.

  21. Haywood, B. and J. Bessant (1987). The Swedish Approach to the Use of Flexible Manufacturing Systems. Occasional Paper No 3, Innovation Research Group, Brighton Polytechnic.

  22. Hilton, J. (1988). Theatricality and Technology: Pygmalion and the Myth of the Intelligent Machine. Culture, Language and Artificial Intelligence, Conference Papers.

  23. Hunter, J. (1988). The ‘Harvey’ Project: An Intelligent Model-Based System for Diagnosis in Cardiology,Alvey Now. Summer.

  24. Johannessen, K. (1987).Tacit Knowledge: A Research Report. The Swedish Center for Working Life, Stockholm.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Johannessen, K. (1986).The Centrality of Practice in Later Wittgenstein.

  26. Josefson, I. (1987). The Nurse as an Engineer,AI & Society. 1,2.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Karlsen, T.K. and M. Oppen (1988). Professional Knowledge and the Limits of Automation in Administrations, inKnowledge, Skill and Artificial Intelligence. Springer-Verlag.

  28. Kidd, A. and M. Welbank (1984). Knowledge Acquisition, in Fox (ed.)InfoTech State of the Art Report on Expert Systems. InfoTech, Pergamon.

  29. Klein, H. and R. Hirscheim (1985). Fundamental Issues of Decision Support Systems: A Consequentialist Perspective,Decision Support Systems. 1, 5–24.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Kowalski, R. (1982). Logic as a Computer Language, in Clark and Tarnlund (eds)Logic Programming. Academic Press, London. pp3–16.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Kuhn, T. (1970).The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, Illinois.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Lakatos, I. ((1970). Falsification and the Methodology of Scientific Research Programmes, in Lakatos and Musgrave (eds)Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Leith, P. (1987). Involvement, Detachment and Programming: The Belief in PROLOG, in Bloomfield (ed.)The Question of Artificial Intelligence. Croom Helm, London.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Leith, P. (1988). The Application of AI to Law,AI & Society. 2,1.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Magnusson, C. (1988). Introducing Knowledge Based Systems in the Swedish Organisations, in Buchberger et al. (eds)Artificial Intelligence. Complex 2/88.

  36. Michie, D. and R. Johnston (1984).The Creative Computer: Machine Intelligence and Human Knowledge. Penguin Books, Middlesex.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Narayanan, A. (1986). Why AI Cannot Be Wrong, in Gill (ed.)Artificial Intelligence for Society. John Wiley and Sons, Chichester.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Negrotti, M. (1987). The Piping of Thought,AI & Society. 1,2.

  39. Olsen, J.R. and H.H. Rueter (1987). Extracting Expertise from Experts: Methods for Knowledge Acquisition,Expert Systems. 4,3.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Östberg, O., R. Whitaker and B. Amick (1988),The Automated Expert: Technical, Human and Organisational Consideration in Expert Systems Applications, Workshop 8 — Knowledge and Skill Transfer: New Technology and Issues of Training. Conference on Culture, Language and Artificial Intelligence.

  41. Partridge, D. (1987). Human Decision Making and the Symbolic Search Space Paradigm in AI,AI & Society. 1,2.

  42. Polanyi, M. (1966).The Tacit Dimension. Doubleday, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  43. Rauner, F., L. Ramussen and M. Corbett (1988). The Social Shaping of Technology and Work: Human Centred CIM Systems,AI & Society. 2,1.

  44. Rosenbrock, H.H. (1988). Engineering as an Art,AI & Society. 2,4.

    Google Scholar 

  45. Schartum, D.W (1988). Introduction of Information Technology in Social Insurance Institutions, in Buchberger et al. (eds)Artificial Intelligence. Complex 2/88, Tano Oslo.

  46. Simon, H.A. (1981).The Sciences of the Artificial. MIT, MA.

  47. Simon, H.A. (1976).Administrative Behavior. The Free Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  48. Smith, D. (1987).Computer Software as Text: Developments in the Evaluation of Computer Based Educational Media and Materials. A Research Report, NFER, Slough, Berks.

  49. Smithers, T. (1988). Product Creation: An Appropriate Coupling of Human and Artificial Intelligence,AI & Society. 2,4.

    Google Scholar 

  50. Stamper, R. (1988). Pathologies of AI: Responsible Use of Artificial Intelligence in Professional Work,AI & Society. 2,1.

    Google Scholar 

  51. Taylor, F.W. (1911).Principles of Scientific Management.

  52. Turing, A.M. (1936). On Computable Numbers, inProceedings of the London Mathematics Society. C.F. Hodgson, London. Second series, 42. 230–265. The paper in which Turing defined his logical machine.

  53. Turing, A.M. (1950). Computing Machinery and Intelligence,Mind. LIX, 236, 433–460. Reprinted in Hofstader and Dennett (eds) (1981)The Minds I. Basic Books, New York. 53–67.

    Google Scholar 

  54. Weizenbaum, J. (1976).Computer Power and Human Reason: From Judgement to Calculation. Freeman Press, San Francisco, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  55. Whitaker, R. and O. Östberg (1988). Channeling Knowledge: Expert Systems as Communication Media,AI & Society. 2,3.

  56. Winograd, T. and F. Flores (1986).Understanding Computers and Cognition: A New Foundation for Design. Ablex Publishing Corporation, New Jersey.

    Google Scholar 

  57. Wittgenstein, L. (1963).Philosophical Investigations. Blackwell, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  58. Wittgenstein, L. (1969).On Certainty. Blackwell, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gill, S.P. On two AI traditions. AI & Soc 2, 321–340 (1988). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01891366

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01891366

Keywords

Navigation