Abstract
In Marx’s posthumously published manuscripts from 1857–1863, we find a systematic exposition of his concept of subsumption. Though much has been written about it, significant interpretative gaps persist. In this article, I begin filling these gaps by examining the emergence of Marx’s concept of subsumption. I will argue that in the Grundrisse Marx brings together distinct but complementary elements from Hegel’s theories of judgment and teleology to coin two new and well delineated concepts of subsumption that prefigure his later concepts of formal and real subsumption. These two concepts may be defined as: (a) the process of acquiring the social relational property of being a means to an end; (b) the process by which changes in non-relational properties occur in something due to this acquisition – and occur to better suit said end.
Bibliography
- AA
Kant, I. 1968. Kants Werke. Ed. Preussischen Akademie der Wissenschaften. Berlin: de Gruyter.
- GW
Hegel, G. W. F. 1968. Gesammelte Werke. Ed. Rheinisch-Westfälischen Akademie der Wissenschaften. Hamburg: Meiner.
- MECW
Marx, K. and Engels, F. 1975. Collected Works. Ed. Institute of Marxism–Leninism. New York: International Publishers.
- MEGA
Marx, K. and Engels, F. 1958. Gesamtausgabe. Ed. Institut für Marxismus-Leninismus. Berlin: Dietz.
Allison, H. 1981. ‘Transcendental Schematism and The Problem of the Synthetic A Priori.’ Dialectica 35 (1/2), 57–83.10.1111/j.1746-8361.1981.tb01497.xSearch in Google Scholar
Althusser, L. and Balibar. É. 2009. Reading Capital. Trans. B. Brewster. London: Verso.Search in Google Scholar
Arthur, C. J. 2009. ‘The Possessive Spirit of Capital: Subsumption/Inversion/Contradiction.’ In R. Bellofiore and R. Fineschi (eds.), Re-reading Marx: New Perspectives After the Critical Edition. London: Palgrave Macmillan, 148–162.10.1007/978-0-230-30514-4_9Search in Google Scholar
Babbage, C. 1835. On the Economy of Machinery and Manufactures. London: Knight.Search in Google Scholar
Bacon, R. 1986–1987, Summulae dialectices, Ed. A. de Libera. Archives d’Histoire Doctrinale et Littéraire du Moyen Age, 53: 139–289, 54: 171–278.Search in Google Scholar
Balibar, É. 2019. ‘Towards a New Critique of Political Economy: from Generalized Surplus Value to Total Subsumption.’ In P. Osborne et al. (eds), Capitalism: Concept, Idea, Image: Aspects of Marx’s Capital Today. London: CRMEP Books, 36–57.Search in Google Scholar
Baumgarten, A. 2020. Elements of First Practical Philosophy: A Critical Translation with Kant’s Reflections on Moral Philosophy. Ed. and trans. C. D. Fugate and J. Hymers. London: Bloomsbury.Search in Google Scholar
de Boer, K. 2020. Kant’s Reform of Metaphysics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Buridan, J. Quaestiones in duos libros Aristotelis Posteriorum Analyticorum. Ed. H. Hubien. Unpublished typescript.Search in Google Scholar
Cohen, G. A. 2000. Karl Marx’s Theory of History. A Defence. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Doz, A. 1987. La logique de Hegel et les problèmes traditionnels de l’ontologie. Paris: Vrin.Search in Google Scholar
Hardt, M. and Negri, A. 2000. Empire. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.10.4159/9780674038325Search in Google Scholar
Hegel, G. W. F. 1979. System of Ethical Life (1802/3) and First Philosophy of Spirit. Ed. and trans. H. S. Haris and T. M. Knox. Albany: SUNY Press.Search in Google Scholar
—. 1991. Elements of the Philosophy of Right. Trans. H. B. Nisbet. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar
—. 2008. Lectures on Logic. Trans. C. Butler. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Search in Google Scholar
—. 2010a. Science of Logic. Trans. G. Di Giovanni, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar
—. 2010b. Encyclopedia of the Philosophical Sciences in Basic Outline. Part I: Science of Logic. Trans. K. Brinkmann and D. O. Dahlstrom. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Heil, J. 2009. ‘Relations.’ In R. Le Poidevin et al. (eds), Routledge Companion to Metaphysics. London: Routledge, 310–321.10.4324/9780203879306-34Search in Google Scholar
Heinrich, M. 2013. ‘The ‘Fragment on Machines’: A Marxian Misconception in the Grundrisse and its Overcoming in Capital.’ In R. Bellofiore et al. (eds.), In Marx’s Laboratory: Critical Interpretations of the Grundrisse. Leiden: Brill, 197–212.Search in Google Scholar
Horstmann, R-P. 1984. Ontologie und Relationen: Hegel, Bradley, Russell, und die Kontroverse über interne und externe Beziehungen. Königstein: Athenäum.Search in Google Scholar
Kant, I. 1998. Critique of Pure Reason. Ed. and trans. P. Guyer and A. W. Wood. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511804649Search in Google Scholar
Leibniz, G. W. and Clarke, S. 2000. Correspondence. Ed. R. Ariew. Indianapolis: Hackett.Search in Google Scholar
Longuenesse, B. 2001. Kant and the Capacity to Judge. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Search in Google Scholar
—. 2007. Hegel’s Critique of Metaphysics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Martin, C. 2012. Ontologie der Selbstbestimmung: Eine operationale Rekonstruktion von Hegels “Wissenschaft der Logik.” Heidelberg: Mohr Siebeck.Search in Google Scholar
Marx, K. 1976. Capital. A Critique of Political Economy. Trans. B. Fowkes. New York: Penguin.Search in Google Scholar
—. 1992. Early Writings. Trans. R. Livingstone and G. Benton, New York: Penguin.Search in Google Scholar
—. 1993. Grundrisse. Foundations of the Critique of Political Economy. Trans. M. Nicolaus, New York: Penguin.Search in Google Scholar
McTaggart, J. M. E. 1910. A Commentary on Hegel’s Logic. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Meaney, M. E. 2002. Capital as Organic Unity: The Role of Hegel’s Science of Logic in Marx’s Grundrisse. Dordrecht: Springer.10.1007/978-94-015-9854-5Search in Google Scholar
Murray, P. 2016. The Mismeasure of Wealth: Essays on Marx and Social Form. Leiden: Brill.10.1163/9789004326071Search in Google Scholar
Negri, A. 2005. Books for Burning: Between Civil War and Democracy in 1970s Italy. Trans. A. Bove, E. Emery, and F. Novello. London: Verso.Search in Google Scholar
Ockham, W. 1967–88, Opera philosophica et theologica. Ed. G. Gál et al. St. Bonaventure, NY: The Franciscan Institute.Search in Google Scholar
Postone, M. 1993. Time, Labor, and Social Domination: A Reinterpretation of Marx’s Critical Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511570926Search in Google Scholar
Quante, M. 2004. Hegel’s Concept of Action. Trans. D. Moyar. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511498299Search in Google Scholar
Read, J. 2003. The Micro-Politics of Capital: Marx and the Prehistory of the Present. Albany: SUNY Press.10.1353/book4722Search in Google Scholar
Ricardo, D. 1821. On the Principles of Political Economy and Taxation. London: John Murray.Search in Google Scholar
Russell, E-J. 2015. ‘The Logic of Subsumption: An Elective Affinity Between Hegel and Marx.’ Revista Opiniao Filosofica 6(2), 28–48.Search in Google Scholar
de Sicilia, A. S. 2016. ‘The Problem of Subsumption in Kant, Hegel and Marx.’ PhD diss., Kingston University.Search in Google Scholar
Tomba, M. and Bellofiore, R. 2013. ‘The “Fragment on Machines” and the Grundrisse: The Workerist Reading in Question.’ In M. van der Linden and K. H. Roth (eds.), Beyond Marx: Theorizing the Global Labour Relations of the Twenty-First Century. Leiden: Brill, 345–367.10.1163/9789004231351_017Search in Google Scholar
Wolff, C. 1728. Philosophia rationalis sive Logica. Frankfurt: Libraria Rengeriana.Search in Google Scholar
© 2022 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston
