Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Alisa Bokulich and Peter Bokulich (eds): Scientific Structuralism (Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science, Volume 281)

Springer, Dordrecht, Heidelberg, London, New York, 182 + XVII p, 2011

  • Book Review
  • Published:
Erkenntnis Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. According to van Fraassen (2006), it is embarrassing to assert that what is preserved through theory changes is the structure attributed to nature, identifying at the same time structure by noticing what has been preserved. This challenge to both epistemic and ontic forms of structural realism continues to bring into play new responses.

  2. Strangely enough, however, the names of Sneed and Stegmüller do not come to the fore in the volume under review. This omission is surprising, since the authors of the “non-received view” developed versions of structural realism many years before the appearance of John Worrall’s paper. In addition, the members of Munich’s school have developed pro-realist arguments that might be still effective in the contemporary realism-empiricism controversy.

  3. For many years, van Fraassen has been arguing for the compatibility of the semantic view of scientific theories with the denouncement of belief in anything that goes beyond the observable. Following van Fraassen’s thread, the structural empiricist rejects the existence of unobservable mathematical structures as well.

References

  • Brading, K., & Landry, E. (2006). Scientific structuralism: Presentation and representation. Philosophy of Science, 73, 571–581.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chakravartty, A. (2007). A metaphysics for scientific realism: Knowing the unobservable. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • French, S, & Ladyman, J. (2003). Remodelling structural realism: Quantum physics and the metaphysics of structure. Synthese, 136, 31–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thomson-Jones, M. (2006). Models and the semantic view. Philosophy of Science, 73, 524–535.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Fraassen, B. (2006). Structure: Its shadow and substance. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 57, 275–307.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Worrall, J. (1989). Structural realism: The best of both worlds? Dialectica, 43, 99–124.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Sofia University, Sofia, Bulgaria

    Dimitri Ginev

  2. University of Konstanz, Constance, Germany

    Dimitri Ginev

Authors
  1. Dimitri Ginev
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dimitri Ginev.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ginev, D. Alisa Bokulich and Peter Bokulich (eds): Scientific Structuralism (Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science, Volume 281). Erkenn 80, 681–687 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10670-014-9671-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10670-014-9671-4

Search

Navigation