Skip to main content
Log in

What Now in Philosophy of Technology? Ethics, Time, and Poiêsis in Crisis Thinking

  • Commentary
  • Published:
Foundations of Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

A Reply to this article was published on 18 June 2021

The Original Article was published on 11 April 2021

Abstract

This paper challenges that Ihde’s and Stiegler’s approaches stand in radical opposition. It argues that ethos is prior to law, exposes a Heideggerian rift between technoscience and technics, and rejects separation of theory from practice in favor of logics of poiêsis.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Barison, D., & Ross, D. (2004). The Ister, parts 1 and 2. Brooklyn, NY: First Run/Icarus films.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goedecke, W. R. (1971). Ihde’s auditory phenomena and descent not the objective. Philosophy Today, 15(3–4), 175–180.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heidegger, M. (1986). Sein und Zeit (6e ed.). Tübingen: Max Niemeyer Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ihde, D. (1966). Some auditory phenomena. Philosophy Today, 10(4), 227–235.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ihde, D. (1970). Paris and praxis. Social Theory and Practice, 1(1), 48–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ihde, D. (1973). Vision and objectification. Philosophy Today, 17(1), 3–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ihde, D. (1995). Image technologies and traditional culture. In A. Feenberg & A. Hannay (Eds.), Technology and the politics of knowledge (pp. 147–158). Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ihde, D. (1998). Expanding hermeneutics: Visualism in science. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ihde, D. (2007). Listening and voice: Phenomenologies of sound (2nd ed.). Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stiegler, B. (1994, 1996, 2002). La technique et le temps, 3 Tomes. Paris: Editions Galilée.

  • Stiegler, B. (2003). Passer à l’acte. Paris: Editions Galilée.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stiegler, B. (2004). De la misère symbolique, Tome. 2: La catastrophè du sensible. Paris: Editions Galilée.

  • Stiegler, B. (2004a). Mécréance et Discrédit. Tome 1: La décadence des démocraties industrielles. Paris: Editions Galilée.

  • Stiegler, B. (2005). Constituer l’Europe, Tome 2: Le motif européen. Paris: Editions Galilée.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stiegler, B. (2015). The Neganthropocene. London: Open Humanities Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tricia Glazebrook.

Additional information

This comment refers to the article available at https://doi.org/10.1007/s10699-020-09734-5.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Glazebrook, T. What Now in Philosophy of Technology? Ethics, Time, and Poiêsis in Crisis Thinking. Found Sci 27, 305–310 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10699-020-09760-3

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10699-020-09760-3

Keywords

Navigation