David H. Gleason
Abstract
The difference between computers and simple machines is the extent to which computer systems subsume design and development decisions over which users have little or no control. Normally, such decisions are all but forgotten after implementation. Subsumption ethics describes this process.This paper begins with a discussion of subsumption ethics and describes four axioms of subsumption ethics. Four ethical frameworks with roots in philosophical traditions are used as an ethical framework: The golden rule; the golden mean; niskama karma; and complexity. A matrix is presented that combines the axioms of subsumption ethics with these ethical frameworks. The paper concludes by applying the matrix to some standard problems in software systems development.
- 1. See James H. Moor "What Is Computer Ethics" in Johnson & Nissenbaum Computers, Ethics and Social Values (Upper Saddle River, New Jersey: Prentice Hall, 1995), p. 13.Google Scholar
- 2. See Case 8.2 "The Therac-25" in Richard Spinello Case Studies in Information and Computer Ethics (Upper Saddle River, New Jersey: Prentice Hall, 1997), p. 198ff.Google Scholar
- 3. Matthew 7:12, NIV.Google Scholar
- 4. Software Toolworks Encyclopedia, s.v."Immanuel Kant."Google Scholar
- 5. Software Toolworks Encyclopedia, s.v. "Categorical Imperative."Google Scholar
- 6. Aristotle, Nicomachean Ethics, trans. Terence Irwin (Indianapolis: Hackett, 1985), 1106a, p. 43.Google Scholar
- 7. Ibid., 1107a, p. 44.Google Scholar
- 8. Ibid., 1112a, p. 61.Google Scholar
- 9. Ibid., 1095a, p. 5.Google Scholar
- 10. P.N. Srinivasachari, The Ethical Philosophy of the Gita (Madras, India: Jupiter Press, 1966) {U.S. Distribution by Vedanta Press, Hollywood, CA}, p. 63.Google Scholar
- 11. Ibid., p. 50.Google Scholar
- 12. The Bhagavad Gita, Winthrop Sargeant, trans. (Albany: State University of New York Press, 1994), V.12.Google Scholar
- 13. Ibid., VI.35.Google Scholar
- 14. John Rawls, A Theory of Justice (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1971).Google Scholar
- 15. John Rawls, Political Liberalism (New York: Columbia University Press, 1993), p. 6.Google Scholar
- 16. Ibid., p. lix.Google Scholar
- 17. Ibid., p. 37.Google Scholar
- 18. Rogerson, S. and Gotterbarn, D. "The Ethics of Software Project Management" from Computer Ethics Conference, Sweden, 1997, p. 6.Google Scholar
- 19. Brey, Philip, "The Politics of Computer Systems and tile Ethics of Design." To appear in Computer Ethics: Philosophical Enquiry, Proceedings of CEPE97, Erasmus University Rotterdam 11-13 June 1997, An ACM/SIGCAS Conference, ed. M.J. van den Hoven, Rotterdam University Press.Google Scholar
- 20. Jerry Useem, "The Virtue of Necessity," Inc., December, 1996, p. 80.Google Scholar
- 21. Ibid., p. 88.Google Scholar
- 22. Rushworth Kidder, "A single ethical decision can now have world-class ramifications," The Boston Globe, 6/8/97, p. B15.Google Scholar
Index Terms
- Subsumption ethics
Recommendations
From ethics washing to ethics bashing: a view on tech ethics from within moral philosophy
FAT* '20: Proceedings of the 2020 Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and TransparencyThe word 'ethics' is under siege in technology policy circles. Weaponized in support of deregulation, self-regulation or handsoff governance, "ethics" is increasingly identified with technology companies' self-regulatory efforts and with shallow ...
Moral luck and computer ethics: Gauguin in cyberspace
I argue that the problem of `moral luck' is an unjustly neglected topic within Computer Ethics. This is unfortunate given that the very nature of computer technology, its `logical malleability', leads to ever greater levels of complexity, unreliability ...
Flourishing Ethics
This essay describes a new ethical theory that has begun to coalesce from the works of several scholars in the international computer ethics community. I call the new theory Flourishing Ethics' because of its Aristotelian roots, though it also includes ...
Comments