Skip to main content
Log in

Face Recognition and the Social Individual

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Biosemiotics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

“Nothing and nobody exists in this world whose very being does not presuppose a spectator. In other words, nothing that is, in so far as it appears, exists in the singular; everything that is is meant to be perceived by somebody. Not Man but men inhabit this planet. Plurality is the law of the earth.”

Hannah Arendt

Abstract

Face recognition depends upon the uniqueness of each human face. This is accomplished by the patterns formed by the unique relationship among face features. Unique face-patterns are produced by the intrusion of random factors into the process of biological growth and development. Processes are described which enable a unique face-pattern to be represented as a percept in the visual sensory system. The components of the face recognition system are analyzed as is the manner in which the precept is connected through microcircuits to a memory file so that the history of a perceiver’s encounters with a familiar face enables the perceiver to access a memory store that is a record of the outcome of past encounters with the perceived. The importance of the face recognition system in enabling humans to individuate members the social group is discussed, as well as the importance of face recognition in the development of the individual’s social identity and ability to be a collaborative member of the social groups to which it belongs. The role of prosopagnosia—the inability to recognize familiar faces—in furthering an understanding of the face recognition system is examined, as is its importance in demonstrating the crucial nature of face recognition in human social functions. It is proposed that human face recognition is not a unique phenomenon but is an elaboration of processes existing in nonhuman primates as well as in lower animals.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. We have previously discussed the mechanisms by which such transfers are established. The transferred patterns become representations in the form of neuronal ensembles in mammalian sensory systems (Swan and Goldberg 2010; Goldberg and Rosenblum 2013; Goldberg and Swan 2011). We called these representations “brain-objects” and noted the requirement that they must represent with fidelity the morphological patterns of the objects in the environment which they represent. Representations in mammals also depend on the presence of extensive, high resolution, receptor sheets such as the retina, cochlear membrane, and mechanoreceptors in finger pads (Goldberg and Swan 2011).

  2. See a discussion on the formation of brain-objects in Swan and Goldberg (2010).

  3. The timing of the word identification process from stimulus onset to vocalization of the identified word is discussed in detail in Goldberg and Rosenblum (2013).

References

  • Adolphs, R. (2003). Cognitive neuroscience of human social behaviour. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 4(3), 165–178.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Damasio, A. R., et al. (1982). Posopagnosia: anatomic basis and behavioral mechanisms. Neurology, 32, 331–341.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Damasio, A. R., et al. (1990). Face agnosia and the neural substrates of memory. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 13, 89–109.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Damasio, H., et al. (2004). Neural systems behind word and concept retrieval. Cognition, 92(1–2), 179–229.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gauthier, I., Skudlarski, P., Gore, J. C., & Anderson, A. W. (2000). Expertise for cars and birds recruits brain areas involved in face recognition. Nat Neurosci, 3(2), 191–197.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldberg, L. J., & Rosenblum, L. A. (2013). On the Genetic and Epigenetic Bases of Primate Signal Processing. Biosemiotics, 6(2) 161–176.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldberg, L. J., & Swan, L. S. (2011). A biosemiotic analysis of Braille. Biosemiotics, 4(1) 25–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grabowski, T. J., et al. (2001). A role for left temporal pole in the retrieval of words for unique entities. Human Brain Mapping, 13(4), 199–212.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gruter, T., et al. (2008). Neural and genetic foundations of face recognition and prosopagnosia. Journal of Neuropsychology, 2(Pt 1), 79–97.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hadjikhani, N., & de Gelder, B. (2002). Neural basis of prosopagnosia: an fMRI study. Human Brain Mapping, 16(3), 176–182.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Leopold, D. A., & Rhodes, G. (2010). A comparative view of face perception. Journal of Comparative Psychology, 124(3), 233–251.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lhermitte, J., et al. (1972). Etude anatome-clinique d’un cas de prosopangnosie. Revue Neurologique (Paris), 126, 329–346.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Maurer, D., et al. (2002). The many faces of configural processing. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 6(6), 255–260.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Phillips, P. J., et al. (2011). Distinguishing identical twins by face recognition. 2011 I.E. International Conference on Automatic Face & Gesture Recognition and Workshops (FG 2011).

  • Purves, D., et al. (2008). Principles of cognitive neuroscience. Sunderland: Sinauer Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Streit, M., et al. (2000). Electrophysiological correlates of emotional and structural face processing in humans. Neuroscience Letters, 278(1–2), 13–16.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Streit, M., et al. (2003). Time course of regional brain activations during facial emotion recognition in humans. Neuroscience Letters, 342(1–2), 101–104.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sun, Z., et al. (2010). A study of multibiometric traits of identical twins. In B. V. K. V. Kumar, S. Prabhakar & A. A. Ross (Eds.), Biometric technology for human identification VII. Proc. SPIE 7667.

  • Swan, L. S., & Goldberg, L. J. (2010). How Is meaning grounded in the organism? Biosemiotics, 3(2), 131–146.

  • Takamura, M. (1996). Prosopagnosia: a look at the laterality and specificity issues using evidence from neuropsychology and neurophysiology. The Harvard Brain Spring, 1996, 9–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, C., et al. (2009). Reduced structural connectivity in ventral visual cortex in congenital prosopagnosia. Nature Neuroscience, 12(1), 29–31.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tomasello, M., et al. (2005). Understanding and sharing intentions: the origins of cultural cognition. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 28(5), 675–691. discussion 691–735.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, E. O. (2012). The social conquest of earth. New York: Liveright Publishing Corporation.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

I would like to thank Leonard Rosenblum for his invaluable help in the development of the concepts presented in this paper.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Louis J. Goldberg.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Goldberg, L.J. Face Recognition and the Social Individual. Biosemiotics 6, 573–583 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12304-013-9188-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12304-013-9188-2

Keywords

Navigation