Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Memory recovery and repression: What is the evidence?

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Health Care Analysis Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Both the theory that traumatic childhood memories can be repressed, and the reliability of the techniques used to retrieve these memories are challenged in this paper. Questions are raised about the robustness of the theory and the literature that purports to provide scientific evidence for it. Evidence to this end is provided by the demographic and qualitative results of a research study conducted by the authors which surveyed New Zealand families in which one member had accused another (or others) of sexual abuse on the basis of recovered memories. It is shown that a number of these allegations involve very low probability events. Since memory repression theory is not currently scientifically substantiated it is argued that care needs to be taken in the mental health, legal and insurance compensation arenas. Memories recalled during therapy may be treated as metaphorical but, in the absence of corroborative evidence, should not be considered factually true. Clinicians who wish to use memory recovery techniques should inform patients of their experimental and controversial nature, point out potential adverse effects, and obtain consent before proceeding.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bass, E. and Davis, L. (1988).The Courage to Heal: A Guide For Women Survivors of Sexual Abuse, Harper and Row, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Blume, E. S. (1990).Secret Survivors: Uncovering Incest and Its After-effects in Women, John Wiley and Sons, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Fredrickson, R. (1992).Repressed Memories: A Journey to Recovery from Sexual Abuse, Simon and Schuster, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Yakpo, M. (1994). Suggestibility and repressed memories of abuse: a survey of psychotherapists’ beliefs.American Journal of Hypnosis 36(3), 163–171.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Lindsay, S. and Read, D. (1994). Psychotherapy and memories of childhood sexual abuse: a cognitive perspective.Applied Cognitive Psychology 8, 281–338.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Poole, D., Lindsay, D., Memon, A. and Bull, R. (1995). Psychotherapy and the recovery of memories of childhood sexual abuse: US and British practitioners’ beliefs, practices and experiences.Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 63(3), 426–437.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Andrews, B., Morton, J., Bekerian, D., Davies, G. and Mollon, P. (1995). The recovery of memories in clinical practice: experiences and beliefs of British Psychological Society practitioners.The Psychologist 209–214.

  8. Holmes, D. (1990). The evidence for repression: an examination of sixty years of research. In,Repression and Dissociation, ed. by Singer, University of Chicago Press, Chicago and London.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Pope, H. and Hudson, J. (1995). Can memories of childhood sexual abuse be repressed?Psychological Medicine 25, 121–126.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Corballis, M. (1990). The two profiles of psychology.New Zealand Journal of Psychology 19, 2–8.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Ceci, S. and Bruck, M. (1995).Jeopardy in the Courtroom, American Psychological Association, Washington DC.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders 4th edition (1994). American Psychiatric Association, Washington DC.

  13. Sarbin, T. (1995). On the belief that one body may be host to two or more personalities.International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis XLIII, 163–183.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Enns, C. Z., McNeilly, C., Corkery, J. and Gilbert, M. (1995). The debate about delayed memories of child sexual abuse: a feminist perspective.Counselling Psychologist 23(2), 181–279.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Schechter, M. and Roberges, C. (1976). Sexual exploitation. In,Child Abuse and Neglect: The Family and The Community, ed. by R. Helfer and C. Kempe, Ballinger, Massachusetts.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Wyatt, G. (1985). The sexual abuse of Afro-American and white-American women in childhood.Child Abuse and Neglect 9, 507–519.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Briere, J. and Conte, J. (1993). Self-reported amnesia for abuse in adults molested as children.Journal of Traumatic Stress 6(1), 21–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Herman, J. and Schatzow, E. (1987). Recovery and verification of childhood sexual trauma.Psychoanalytic Psychology 4, 1–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Loftus, E., Polonsky, S. and Fulilove, M. (1994). Memories of childhood sexual abuse: remembering and repressing.Psychology of Women Quarterly 18, 67–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Williams, L. M. (1994). Recall of childhood trauma: a prospective study of women’s memories of child sexual abuse.Journal of Clinical and Consulting Psychology 62, 1167–1176.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Femina, D., Yeager, C. and Lewis, D. (1990). Child abuse: adolescent records vs adult recall.Child Abuse and Neglect: the International Journal 14, 227–231.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Strom, A., Refum, S., Eitinger, L., Gronvik, O., Lonnum, A., Engeset, A., Osvk, K. and Rogan, B. (1962). Examination of Norwegian ex-concentration camp prisoners.Journal of Neuropsychiatry 4, 43–62.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Malmquist, C. (1986). Children who witness parental murder: post-traumatic aspects.Journal of American Academy of Child Psychiatry 25, 320–325.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Terr, L. (1983). Chowchilla revisited: the effects of psychic trauma 4 years after a school-bus kidnapping.American Journal of Psychiatry 140, 1543–1550.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Terr, L. (1991). Childhood traumas: an outline and overview.American Journal of Psychiatry 148, 10–20.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Benedek, E. and Schetky, D. (1987). Problems in validating allegations of sexual abuse. Part I: factors affecting perception and recall of events.Journal of American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry 26(6), 912–916.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Ceci, S., Loftus, E., Leitchman, M. and Bruck, M. (1994). The possible source of misattributions in the creation of false beliefs amongst pre-schoolers.International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis XLII(4), 304–320.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Garry, M. and Loftus, E. (1994). Pseudomemories without hypnosis.International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis XLII(4), 363–378.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Loftus, E. (1993). The reality of repressed memories.American Psychologist 48, 518–537.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Ofshe, R. and Singer, M. (1994). Recovered-memory therapy and robust repression: influence and pseudomemories.International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis XLII(4), 391–410.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Spanos, N., Burgess, C. and Burgess, M. (1994). Past-life identities, UFO abductions, and satanic ritual abuse: the social construction of memories.International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis XLII(4), 434–445.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Spiegel, D. and Scheflin, A. (1994). Dissociated or fabricated? Psychiatric aspects of repressed memory in criminal and civil cases.International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis XLII(4), 411–432.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Spence, D. (1994). Narrative truth and putative child abuse.International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis XLII(4), 289–303.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Bottoms, B., Shaver, P. and Goodman, G. (1996). An analysis of ritualistic and religious-based child abuse allegations.Law & Human Behavior 20(1), 1–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Lanning, K. (1991). Ritual abuse; a law enforcement view or perspective.Child Abuse and Neglect 15, 171–173.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Goodman, G., Qin, J., Bottoms, B. and Shaver, P. (1994).Characteristics and Sources of Allegations of Ritualistic Satanic Abuse, Report to the National Center on Child Abuse and Neglect.

  37. La Fontaine, J. (1994).The Extent and Nature of Organised and Ritual Abuse, HMSO, London.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Cole, W. G. and Loftus, E. F. (1979). Incorporating new information into memory.American Journal of Psychology 92(3), 413–425.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Loftus, E., Korf, K. and Schooler, J. (1989). Misguided memories: sincere distortion of reality. In,Credibility Assessment, ed. by J. Yuille, Kluwer Academic Publishers.

  40. Foley, M. and Johnson, M. (1985). Confusions between memories for performed and imagined actions: a developmental comparison.Child Development 56, 1145–1155.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Lindsay, D. (1990). Misleading suggestions can impair eyewitnesses’ ability to remember event details.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition 16(6), 1077–1083.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Flin, R. (1991). Commentary: a grand memory for forgetting. In,The Suggestibility of Children’s Recollections: Implications for Eyewitness Testimony, ed. by J. Doris, American Psychological Association, Washington DC.

    Google Scholar 

  43. Poole, D. and White, L. (1993). Two years later: effects of question repetition and retention interval on the eyewitness testimony of children and adults.Developmental Psychology 29, 844–853.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Feldman-Summers, S. and Pope, K. (1994). The experience of ‘forgetting’ childhood abuse: a national survey of psychologists.Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 62(3), 636–639.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Pope, K. and Tabachnick, B. (1995). Recovered memories of abuse among therapy patients: a national survey.Ethics and Behavior 5(3), 237–248.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Erikson, W., Walbek, N. and Seely, R. (1988). Behavior patterns of child molesters.Archives of Sexual Behavior 17(1), 77–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Tollison, C. and Adams, H. (1979).Sexual Disorders: Treatment, Theory and Research, Gardner, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  48. Kendall-Tackett, K. and Simon, A. (1987). Perpetrators and their acts: data from 365 adults molested as children.Child Abuse and Neglect 11, 237–245.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. Kuhn, T. (1970).The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, 2nd Edition revised, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  50. Freud, S. (1915). 1957 Repression, translated by C. Baines and J. Strachey. In:The Standard Edition of the Complete Psychological Works of Sigmund Freud, Hogarth, London.

    Google Scholar 

  51. Masson, J. (1984).The Assault on Truth; Freud’s Suppression of the Seduction Theory, Farrar, Straus and Giroux, United States.

    Google Scholar 

  52. Smith, M. and Pazder, L. (1980).Michele Remembers, Simon and Schuster Inc, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  53. Calof, D. (1993). Facing the truth about false memory.Family Therapy Networker, 9–12.

  54. Merskey, H. (1994).Repression, Belief in the Patient and Other Nostrums. Presentation at FMS Foundation 2nd International Conference, Baltimore.

  55. Harvey, M. and Herman, J. (1994). Amnesia, partial amnesia and delayed recall among adult survivors of childhood trauma.Consciousness and Cognition 3, 295–306.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Dawes, R. (1994).House of Cards: Psychology and Psychotherapy Built on Myth, Free Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  57. American Psychiatric Association (1993).Statement on Memories of Sexual Abuse, Washington DC, USA.

  58. Council on Scientific Affairs, American Medical Association, report presented by Coble, Yank (1994).Memories of Childhood Abuse, CSA report 5-A-94, 1–4.

  59. Australian Psychological Society (1994).Guidelines Relating to Recovered Memories.

  60. Pope, H. and Hudson, J. (1995). Does childhood sexual abuse cause adult psychiatric disorders? Essentials of methodology.Journal of Psychiatry and Law 23(3), 363–381.

    Google Scholar 

  61. Lindsay, S. (1995). Beyond backlash: comments on Enns, McNeilly, Corkery and Gilbert.Counselling Psychologist 23(2), 280–289.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  62. McElroy, S. and Keck, P. (1995). Recovered memory therapy: false memory syndrome and other complications.Psychiatric Annuals 25(12), 731–735.

    Google Scholar 

  63. MacLeod, M. and Saraga, E. (1988). Challenging the orthodoxy: toward a feminist theory and practice.Feminist Review 28, 16–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  64. Thomas, Hon Justice E. (1994). Was Eve merely framed; or was she forsaken?,New Zealand Law Journal 368–373 and 426–432.

  65. Hampton, N. QC (1995). Recovered memory syndrome v false memory syndrome or in repression and revenge, where resides justice?New Zealand Law Journal 1995 154–157.

  66. American Medical Association Council on Scientific Affairs (1985). Scientific status of refreshing recollection by the use of hypnosis.Journal of American Medical Association 253(19), 1918–1923.

    Google Scholar 

  67. Orne, M., Whitehouse, W., Dinges, D. and Orne, E. (1988). Reconstructing memory through hypnosis: forensic and clinical implications. Reprinted fromHypnosis and Memory, ed. by H. Pettinati, Guilford Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  68. Bloom, P. B. (1994). Clinical guidelines in using hypnosis in uncovering memories of sexual abuse: a master class commentary.International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis 42(3), 173–178.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  69. Kihlstrom, J. (1994). Hypnosis, delayed recall, and the principles of memory.International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis 42(4), 337–345.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  70. Council on Scientific Affairs, American Medical Association (1985). Scientific status of refreshing recollection by the use of hypnosis.JAMA 253(13), 1918–1923.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  71. McConkey, K. (1995). Hypnosis, memory and the ethics of uncertainty.Australian Psychologist 30(1), 1–10.

    Google Scholar 

  72. Orne, M. (1951). The mechanisms of hypnotic age regression: an experimental study.Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology 46(2), 213–225.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  73. Perry, C., Orne, M., London, R. and Orne, E. (1996). Rethinking per se exclusions of hypnotically elicited recall as legal testimony.International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis XLIV, 66–81.

    Google Scholar 

  74. Hochman, J. (1994). Buried memories challenge the law.National Law Journal 16(17), 17.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Psychiatry and Behavioural Science, University of Auckland, Private Bag 92019, Auckland, New Zealand

    Felicity A. Goodyear-Smith, Tannis M. Laidlaw & Robert G. Large

Authors
  1. Felicity A. Goodyear-Smith
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Tannis M. Laidlaw
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Robert G. Large
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Goodyear-Smith, F.A., Laidlaw, T.M. & Large, R.G. Memory recovery and repression: What is the evidence?. Health Care Anal 5, 99–111 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02678412

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02678412

Keywords

Search

Navigation