Abstract
Free full text
Ethics-committee authorization in Germany.
Abstract
On 9 August 1994 the German legislature revised the German Drug Law (AMG). Included in the revision is a passage requiring, for the first time, that the sponsors and investigators of clinical studies involving human subjects first obtain the approval of an ethics committee before carrying out such studies. According to the legislation, which takes effect on 17 August 1995, approval is to come from 'an independent ethics committee, set up and administered according to state law [emphasis added]' (1). Although it is clear according to the text that the 16 federal states have been empowered to establish ethics committees within their jurisdictions, this does not mean that the state governments are free to transfer exclusive authority in the matter to their respective medical associations, a step that would effectively abolish Germany's private ethics committees. First, the legislation does not rule out the authorization of private ethics committees. Second, as legal scholars attest, the exclusive control of ethics committees by the medical associations would constitute an illegal monopoly. Third, it is arguable that medical-association ethics committees fail to meet the one prior federal requirement, that of independence. There is a great deal of confusion in Germany today about which kinds of ethics committees (public and/or private) the states will sanction before 17 August 1995. In an attempt to sort things out we present a brief explanation of how ther came to be two kinds of ethics committees in Germany, review the legal battle between the two over the issue of authorization, point out how the German legislature, in passing the recent bill, has missed an opportunity to clarify the issue and, finally suggest why the administration of ethics committees by the medical associations may be incompatible with the requirement that ethics committees be independent.
Full text
Full text is available as a scanned copy of the original print version. Get a printable copy (PDF file) of the complete article (849K), or click on a page image below to browse page by page. Links to PubMed are also available for Selected References.
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Pfeiffer G, Tiedemann IK. Medizinische Forschung und Ethikkommissionen. Med Klin (Munich) 1989 Nov 15;84(11):557–561. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
Articles from Journal of Medical Ethics are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group
Full text links
Read article at publisher's site: https://doi.org/10.1136/jme.21.4.229
Read article for free, from open access legal sources, via Unpaywall: https://jme.bmj.com/content/medethics/21/4/229.full.pdf
Citations & impact
Impact metrics
Citations of article over time
Article citations
Review of Scientific Self-Experimentation: Ethics History, Regulation, Scenarios, and Views Among Ethics Committees and Prominent Scientists.
Rejuvenation Res, 22(1):31-42, 08 Aug 2018
Cited by: 9 articles | PMID: 29926769
Review
Variation in institutional review board responses to a standard protocol for a multicenter clinical trial.
Acad Emerg Med, 8(6):636-641, 01 Jun 2001
Cited by: 72 articles | PMID: 11388939
Research ethics: international perspectives.
Camb Q Healthc Ethics, 6(4):376-384, 01 Jan 1997
Cited by: 1 article | PMID: 9292215
Review
Similar Articles
To arrive at the top five similar articles we use a word-weighted algorithm to compare words from the Title and Abstract of each citation.
Evaluation of clinical trials by Ethics Committees in Germany: experience of applicants with the review of requests for opinion of the Ethics Committees - results of a survey among members of the German Association of Research-Based Pharmaceutical Companies (VFA).
Ger Med Sci, 7:Doc07, 16 Jul 2009
Cited by: 6 articles | PMID: 19675747 | PMCID: PMC2716553
[Medical research ethics committees in the Federal Republic of Germany: establishment and integration into medical research].
Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz, 62(6):682-689, 01 Jun 2019
Cited by: 7 articles | PMID: 31049626
Review
[Responsibility and function of Research Ethics Committees].
Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz, 52(4):387-393, 01 Apr 2009
Cited by: 2 articles | PMID: 19263025
[Reorganization of the procedures and the tasks of the responsible ethics committees after the 12th AMG amendment. Concepts of the permanent working group of the medical ethics committees in Germany].
Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz, 48(2):155-167, 01 Feb 2005
Cited by: 0 articles | PMID: 15726456
[What a surgeon needs to know of the work of a medical ethics committee/institutional review board].
Zentralbl Chir, 140(1):63-66, 18 Mar 2014
Cited by: 0 articles | PMID: 24643787
Review