Abstract
In traditional ethnographies, it is customarily assumed that the field researcher is an outsider who seeks to acquire an insider’s understanding of the social world being investigated. While conducting field research projects on education and tourism in Trinidad (West Indies) we found that the standard distinction between insider and outsider became problematic for us. Our experiences can be understood in terms of two competing conceptions of fieldwork. One, rooted in classical ethnography, views fieldwork as a process whereby the researcher learns to translate the cultural practices of a little-known or misunderstood group into terms understandable to the ethnographic audience. The other, growing out of the institutional ethnography approach pioneered by Dorothy E. Smith, views fieldwork as a process of mapping the relations that govern an institutional complex. In the latter approach, local experiences provide the point of departure for exploring a wider set of social arrangements. In this article, we treat our own fieldwork experiences as points of departure for a reflexive examination of this alternative ethnographic strategy.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
We made subsequent field visits in 2002 and 2005. Additional field visits are anticipated.
This figure was cited to me by government officials and others associated with the tourism sector. While clearly a rough estimate, it suggests that tourism is a much smaller part of the country’s economy than is the case with many other Caribbean island tourism destinations.
For a conception of social relations that parallels Smith in some respects, see Anthony Giddens’ conception of disembedding and reembedding in The Consequences of Modernity 1990. Dorothy Smith’s conception differs in at least two respects: (1) she is committed to a radical conception of experience grounded in everyday, embodied practices and discoverable through ethnographic exploration, and (2) she insists, along with Michel Foucault, that the extralocal relations of greatest interest are relations of power/knowledge in which issues of marginalization and subordination loom large. By contrast, Giddens’ conception of social relations under conditions of "radicalized" modernity seems less concerned with the everyday world as a point of departure and geared more towards developing a general and systematic framework for analyzing institutional dimensions of globalization (see Smith 2005, pp. 53–54).
This history of resistance is explored in Grahame (2004).
In addition to participant observation, I conducted interviews with tour guides and organizers, visitors, nature center staff, government officials, and villagers. I also collected textual materials including promotional brochures, government publications, travel journalism, travel guidebooks, field guides, academic studies of tourism, etc. The present account focuses on what was observed through participation, but also draws on these other sources of information.
References
Adler, P., & Adler, P. (1987). Membership roles in field research. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Altheide, D., & Johnson, J. (1994). Criteria for assessing interpretive validity in qualitative research. In N. Denzin & Y. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 485–499). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Anderson, E. (1976). A place on the corner. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Anderson, E. (2003). Jelly’s place: An ethnographic memoir. Symbolic Interaction, 26, 217–237.
Atkinson, P. (1990). The ethnographic imagination: Textual constructions of reality. London: Routledge.
Baca Zinn, M. (1979). Insider field research in minority communities. Social Problems, 27, 209–219.
Boo, E. (1990). Ecotourism: The potentials and pitfalls. Washington, DC: World Wildlife Fund.
Campbell, C. (1985). The East Indian revolt against missionary education. In J. LaGuerre (Ed.), Calcutta to Caroni: The East Indians of Trinidad (2nd ed.). St Augustine, Trinidad: Extra Mural Studies Unit, University of the West Indies.
Campbell, M., & Gregor, F. (2002). Mapping social relations: A primer in doing institutional ethnography. Aurora, ON: Garamond Press.
Chagnon, N. (2003). Doing fieldwork among the Yanomamo. In J. Henslin (Ed.), Down to earth sociology (12th ed.). New York: Free Press.
Clifford, J., & Marcus, G. E. (1986). Writing culture: The poetics and politics of ethnography. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Collins, P. (1986). Learning from the outsider within: The sociological significance of Black feminist thought. Social Problems, 33, 514–532.
Collins, P. (2000). Black feminist thought: Knowledge, consciousness, and the politics of empowerment (2nd ed.). New York: Routledge.
Davis, S. (1997). Spectacular nature: Corporate culture and the Sea World experience. Berkeley: University of California Press.
DeVault, M. (1999). Liberating method: Feminism and social research. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.
DeVault, M., & McCoy, L. (2002). Institutional ethnography: Using interviews to investigate ruling relations. In J. Gubrium & J. Holstein (Eds.), Handbook of interview research: Context and method (pp. 751–776). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
Duneier, M. (1999). Sidewalk. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.
Fetterman, D. (1997). Ethnography: Step-by-step (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
ffrench, R. (1991). A guide to the birds of Trinidad & Tobago (2nd ed.). Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
Fine, G. A. (1993). Ten lies of ethnography: Moral dilemmas of field research. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography, 22, 267–294.
Giddens, A. (1990). The consequences of modernity. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
Goffman, E. (1959). The presentation of self in everyday life. New York: Doubleday.
Grahame, P. (1998). Ethnography, institutions, and the social organization of knowledge. Human Studies, 21, 347–360.
Grahame, K. M. (2004). Education and community in the Asian diaspora: The struggle for Hindu schools in Trinidad. Education and Society, 22, 65–81.
Grahame, P., & Grahame, K. (2000–2001). Official knowledge and the relations of ruling: Explorations in institutional ethnography. The Journal for Pedagogy, Pluralism, & Practice, 5, retrieved from http://www.lesley.edu/journals/jppp/5/grahame.html.
Griffith, A. (1998). Insider/outsider: Epistemological privilege and mothering work. Human Studies, 21, 361–376.
Holstein, J., & Gubrium, J. (1994). Phenomenology, ethnomethodology, and interpretive practice. In N. Denzin & Y. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 262–272). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Horowitz, R. (1983). Honor and the American dream: Culture and identity in a Chicano community. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
Judd, D. (1999). Constructing the tourist bubble. In D. Judd & S. Fainstein (Eds.), The tourist city (pp. 35–53). New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Liebow, E. (1967). Tally’s corner: A study of Negro streetcorner men. Boston: Little, Brown.
MacCannell, D. (1989). The tourist: A new theory of the leisure class. New York: Schocken.
Merton, R. K. (1972). Insiders and outsiders: A chapter in the sociology of knowledge. American Journal of Sociology, 78, 9–47.
Morales, E. (1989). Cocaine: White gold rush in Peru. Tucson: University of Arizona Press.
Morton, S. E. (1916). John Morton of Trinidad. Toronto: Westminster and Company.
Murphy, W. (1995). A birder’s guide to Trinidad and Tobago. Parkersburg, WV: Peregrine Enterprises, Inc.
Naples, N. (1996). The outsider phenomenon. In C. D. Smith & W. Kornblum (Eds.), In the field: Readings on the field research experience (2nd ed., pp. 139–149). New York: Praeger.
Ramesar, M. S. (1994). Survivors of another crossing: A history of East Indians in Trinidad 1880–1946. St Augustine, Trinidad: School of Continuing Studies, University of the West Indies.
Rogers, M. (2000). Alfred Schutz. In G. Ritzer (Ed.), The Blackwell companion to major social theorists (pp. 367–387). Malden, MA: Blackwell.
Rojek, C. (2000). Mass tourism or the re-enchantment of the world? Issues and contradictions in the study of travel. In M. Gottdiener (Ed.), New forms of consumption: Consumers, culture, and commodification (pp. 51–69). Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
Schutz, A. (1964). The stranger: An essay in social psychology. In A. Brodersen (Ed.), Collected papers. Vol. II. Studies in social theory (pp. 91–105). The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff.
Seesaran, E. B. R. (1994). Social mobility in the Indo-Trinidadian community 1870–1917. Unpublished Ph.D. Dissertation. University of the West Indies, St Augustine, Trinidad.
Simmel, G. (1964). The stranger. In K. Wolff (Ed.), The sociology of Georg Simmel (pp. 402–408). New York: Free Press.
Smith, D. (1987). The everyday world as problematic: A feminist sociology. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
Smith, D. (1990a). The conceptual practices of power: A feminist sociology of knowledge. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
Smith, D. (1990b). On sociological description: A method from Marx. In Texts, facts, and femininity: Exploring the relations of ruling (pp. 86–119). London: Routledge.
Smith, D. (1999). Writing the social: Critique, theory, and investigations. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
Smith, D. (2005). Institutional ethnography: A sociology for people. Lanham, MD: Alta Mira Press.
Stack, C. (1974). All our kin: Strategies for survival in a black community. New York: HarperCollins.
Urry, J. (2002). The tourist gaze (2nd ed.). London: Sage.
Van Maanen, J. (1988). Tales of the field: On writing ethnography. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Villenas, S. (1996). The colonizer/colonized Chicana ethnographer: Identity, marginalization, and co-optation in the field. Harvard Educational Review, 66, 711–731.
Whelan, T. (1991). Nature tourism: Managing for the environment. Washington, DC: Island Press.
Whyte, W. (1943). Streetcorner society: The social structure of an Italian slum. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Wilson, A. (1992). The culture of nature: North American landscape from Disney to the Exxon Valdez. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Grahame, P.R., Grahame, K.M. Points of Departure: Insiders, Outsiders, and Social Relations in Caribbean Field Research. Hum Stud 32, 291–312 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10746-009-9121-5
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10746-009-9121-5