Skip to main content
Log in

The Autonomy of the Contracting Partners: An Argument for Heuristic Contractarian Business Ethics

  • Published:
Journal of Business Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Due to the domain characteristics of business ethics, a contractarian theory for business ethics will need to be essentially different from the contract model as it is applied to other domains. Much of the current criticism of contractarian business ethics (CBE) can be traced back to autonomy, one of its three boundary conditions. After explaining why autonomy is so important, this article considers the notion carefully vis à vis the contracting partners in the contractarian approaches in business ethics. Autonomy is too demanding a condition for the realm of CBE. But a less stringent version of the contract may be possible, a version which uses the contract as a heuristic device, which merely requires moral responsibility. Furthermore, it is argued that views of (human) agency and the moral subject should be made explicit in such a theory.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anderson E. (2000) Beyond Homo Economicus: New Developments in Theories of Social Norms. Philosophy & Public Affairs 29: 170–200

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anshen, M.: 1970, ‘Changing the Social Contract: A Role for Business’, The Columbia Journal of World Business 5, 6; Reprinted in Beauchamp, T. and N. Bowie: 2000, Ethical Theory and Business (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ), pp. 97–103

  • Baier A. (1985) Postures of the Mind. University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis MI

    Google Scholar 

  • Bauman Z. (1993) Postmodern Ethics. Blackwell, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Beauchamp T. (1991) Philosophical Ethics. McGraw-Hill, New York NY

    Google Scholar 

  • Donaldson T. (1982) Corporations and Morality. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs NJ

    Google Scholar 

  • Donaldson, T. and T. Dunfee: 1994, Toward a Unified Conception of Business Ethics: Integrative Social Contract Theory. Academy of Management Review 10: 252–284

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Donaldson T., and Dunfee T. (1999) Ties that Bind. Harvard Business Press, Boston MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Du Gay P. (1996) Consumption and Identity at Work. Sage, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunfee T. (1991) Business Ethics and Extant Social Contracts. Business Ethics Quarterly 1: 23–51

    Google Scholar 

  • Foot Ph. (1972), Morality as a System of Hypothetical Imperatives. Philosophical Review 81: 305–316

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Foucault M. (1977) Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison. Vintage, New York NY

    Google Scholar 

  • French P. (1984) Collective and Corporate Responsibility. Columbia University Press, New York NY

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilbert M. (1992), On Social Facts. Princeton University Press, Princeton NJ

    Google Scholar 

  • Graaf G. de (2003), Tractable Morality Customer Discourses of Bankers, Veterinarians and Charity Workers. Erim, Rotterdam

    Google Scholar 

  • Hampsher-Monk I. (1992), A History of Modern Political Thought. Blackwell, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Hampton J. (1993) Contract and Consent. In: Goodin E., Pettit P. (eds), A Companion to Contemporary Political Philosophy. Blackwell, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Heugens, P., van Oosterhout H., and Kaptein M. (2004) Contractarian Business Ethics: Theory in Search of Applications, Journal of Business Ethics 52(2): iii

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hobbes T. (1991), Leviathan. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Kant I. (2002) Groundwork for the Metaphysics of Morals. Yale University Press, New Haven CT

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaptein M. and Wempe J. (2002) The Balanced Company. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Keeley M. (1988) A Social-Contract Theory of Organizations. University of Notre Dame Press, South Bend IN

    Google Scholar 

  • Kymlicka W. (1990) Contemporary Political Philosophy. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Locke J. (1988), Two Treatises of Government. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • March J. and Olsen J. (1989), Rediscovering Institutions. The Free Press, New York NY

    Google Scholar 

  • Mumford, L.: 1970, The Pentagon of Power. The Myth of the Machine, Vol. II (Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, San Diego, CA)

  • Nietzsche F. (1989) On The Genealogy of Morals. Vintage Books, New York NY

    Google Scholar 

  • Nietzsche F. (1990), Beyond Good and Evil. Penguin Books, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Rawls J. (1971). A Theory of Justice. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogers H., Ogbuehi A., Kochunny C. (1995) Ethics and Transnational Corporations in Developing Countries. Journal of Euromarketing 4(2): 11–38

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scanlon T. (1998) What We Owe to Each Other. Harvard University Press: Cambridge MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Schermer, M.: 2001, The Different Faces of Autonomy. Thesis University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam

  • Sevenhuijsen S. (1998) Citizenship and the Ethics of Care. Boom, Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  • Soule E. (2002) Managerial Moral Strategies—in Search of a Few Good Principles. Academy of Management Review 27: 114–124

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Velasquez M. (1983) Why Corporations are not Responsible for Anything They Do. Journal of Business and Professional Ethics 3: 1–18

    Google Scholar 

  • Velasquez M. (1998) Business Ethics: Concepts and Cases. Prentice Hall, New York NY

    Google Scholar 

  • Willigenburg T. van (2003) Sources of Normativity: Reflectivity Versus Social Contracting. In: Heugens P., van Oosterhout H., Vromen J. (eds), Social Institutions of Capitalism. Edward Elgar Publishing House, Cheltenham, pp. 127–140

    Google Scholar 

  • Wempe B. (2005) In Defense of a Self-Disciplined, Domain-Specific Social Contract Theory of Business Ethics. Business Ethics Quarterly 15: 113–135

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilmot S. (2001) Corporate Moral Responsibility: What Can We Infer from Our Understanding of Organizations?. Journal of Business Ethics 30: 161–169

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wolf S. (1990). Freedom Within Reason Oxford University Press, New York NY

    Google Scholar 

  • Zwart H. (1996) Ethical Concensus and the Truth of Laughter. Kok Pharos Publishing House, Kampen

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

I wish to thank Prof Dr T. van Willigenburg for his major contribution to this paper. I would also like to thank the two reviewers and the editor of this paper, who all gave very insightful criticism on an earlier version.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gjalt de Graaf.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

de Graaf, G. The Autonomy of the Contracting Partners: An Argument for Heuristic Contractarian Business Ethics. J Bus Ethics 68, 347–361 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-006-9018-4

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-006-9018-4

Keywords

Navigation