Abstract
Traditionally, conceptualizations of human values are based on the assumption that individuals possess a single integrated value system comprising those values that people are attracted by and strive for. Recently, however, van Quaquebeke et al. (in J Bus Ethics 93:293–305, 2010) proposed that a value system might consist of two largely independent value orientations—an orientation of ideal values and an orientation of counter-ideal values (values that individuals are repelled by), and that both orientations exhibit antithetic effects on people’s responses to the social world. Following a call for further research on this distinction, we conducted two studies to assess the independent effects of ideal and counter-ideal values in leadership settings. Study 1 (N = 131) finds both value orientations to explain unique variance in followers’ vertical respect for their leaders. Study 2 (N = 136) confirms these results and additionally shows an analogous effect for followers’ identification with their leaders. Most importantly, we find that both value orientations exhibit their effects only independently when the content of the two orientations pertain to different value types in Schwartz’s (in J Soc Issues 50:19–46, 1994) circumplex model. Implications for theory and practice are discussed.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Alwin, D. F. (2010). How good is survey measurement? Assessing the reliability and validity of survey measures. In P. Marsden & J. D. Wright (Eds.), Handbook of survey research (Vol. 2, pp. 405–436). Bingley, UK: Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
Alwin, D. F., & Krosnick, J. A. (1991). The reliability of survey attitude measurement: The influence of question and respondent attributes. Sociological Methods and Research, 20, 139–181.
Aron, A., Aron, E. N., Tudor, M., & Nelson, G. (1991). Close relationships as including other in the self. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60, 241–253.
Bardi, A., & Schwartz, S. H. (2003). Values and behavior: Strength and structure of relations. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 29, 1207–1220.
Bilsky, W., Janik, M., & Schwartz, S. H. (2010). The structural organization of human values—evidence from three rounds of the European Social Survey (ESS). Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology. doi:10.1177/0022022110362757.
Brewer, M. B. (1991). The social self: On being the same and different at the same time. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 17, 475–482.
Cacioppo, J. T., & Berntson, G. G. (1994). Relationship between attitudes and evaluative space: A critical review, with emphasis on the separability of positive and negative substrates. Psychological Bulletin, 115, 401–423.
Cacioppo, J. T., Gardner, W. L., & Berntson, G. G. (1997). Beyond bipolar conceptualizations and measures: The case of attitudes and evaluative space. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 1, 3–25.
Carver, C. S., Sutton, S. K., & Scheier, M. F. (2000). Action, emotion, and personality: Emerging conceptual integration. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26, 741–751.
Cattell, R. B. (1957). Personality and motivation: Structure and measurement. New York, NY: World Book.
Danielsson, P. E. (1980). Euclidean distance mapping. Computer Graphics and Image Processing, 14, 227–248.
Dvir, T., Eden, D., Avolio, B. J., & Shamir, B. (2002). Impact of transformational leadership on follower development and performance: A field experiment. Academy of Management Journal, 45, 735–744.
Heider, F. (1958). The psychology of interpersonal relations. New York, NY: Wiley.
Hemingway, C. A., & Maclagan, P. W. (2004). Managers’ personal values as drivers of corporate social responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics, 50, 33–44.
Kaplan, K. J. (1972). On the ambivalence-indifference problem in attitude theory and measurement: A suggested modification of the semantic differential technique. Psychological Bulletin, 77, 361–372.
Katz, D. (1960). The functional approach to the study of attitudes. Public Opinion Quarterly, 24, 163–204.
Kristof, A. L. (1996). Person-organization fit: An interactive review of its conceptualizations, Measurement and implications. Personnel Psychology, 49, 1–49.
Kristof-Brown, A. L., Zimmerman, R. D., & Johnson, E. C. (2005). Consequences of individuals’ fit at work: A meta-analysis of person-job, person-organization, person-group, and person-supervisor fit. Personnel Psychology, 58, 281–342.
Krosnick, J. A., & Fabrigar, L. R. (1997). Designing rating scales for effective measurement in surveys. In L. E. Lyberg, P. Biemer, M. Collins, E. D. de Leeuw, C. Dippo, N. Schwarz, & D. Trewin (Eds.), Survey measurement and process quality (pp. 14–164). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
Krosnick, J. A., & Presser, S. (2010). Question and questionnaire design. In P. Marsden & J. D. Wright (Eds.), Handbook of survey research (Vol. 2, pp. 263–314). Bingley, UK: Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
Lord, R. G., & Brown, D. J. (2001). Leadership, values, and subor- dinate self-concepts. The Leadership Quarterly, 12, 133–152.
Mael, F., & Ashforth, B. E. (1992). Alumni and their Alma Mater: A partial test of the reformulated model of organizational identification. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 13, 103–123.
Maio, G. R., & Olson, J. M. (1994). Value-attitude-behavior relations: The moderating role of attitude functions. British Journal of Social Psychology, 33, 301–312.
Maio, G. R., & Olson, J. M. (1995). Relations between values, attitudes, and behavioral intentions: The moderating role of attitude function. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 31, 266–285.
Maio, G. R., Olson, J. M., Bernard, M., & Luke, M. (2003). Ideologies, values, attitudes, and behavior. In T. J. Delamater (Ed.), Handbook of social psychology (pp. 283–308). New York, NY: Kluwer Academic.
Meglino, B. M., & Ravlin, E. C. (1998). Individual values in organizations: Concepts, controversies, and research. Journal of Management, 24, 351–389.
Murphy, P. E. (1988). Implementing business ethics. Journal of Business Ethics, 7, 907–915.
Olson, J. M., & Maio, G. R. (2003). Attitudes in social behaviour. In M. J. Lerner & T. Millon (Eds.), Handbook of psychology: Personality and social psychology (pp. 299–325). New York, NY: Wiley.
O’Muircheartaigh, C., Krosnick, J. A., & Helic, A. (1999). Middle alternatives, acquiescence, and the quality of questionnaire data. Paper Presented at the American Association for Public Opinion Research annual meeting, St. Petersburg, FL.
Podsakoff, P. M., Podsakoff, N. P., MacKenzie, S. B., & Lee, J.-Y. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 879–903.
Posner, B. Z. (2010). Another look at the impact of personal and organizational values congruence. Journal of Business Ethics, 97, 535–541.
Rodin, J. M. (1978). Liking and disliking: Sketch of an alternative view. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 4, 473–478.
Rohan, M. J. (2000). A rose by any name? The values construct. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 4, 255–277.
Rokeach, M. (1973). The nature of human values. New York, NY: Free Press.
Rotter, J. B. (1954). Social learning and clinical psychology. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Schwartz, S. H. (1992). Universals in the content and structure of values: Theoretical advances and empirical tests in 20 countries. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 25, pp. 1–65). New York, NY: Academic Press.
Schwartz, S. H. (1994). Are there universal aspects in the structure and contents of human values? Journal of Social Issues, 50, 19–46.
Schwartz, S. H. (2005). Robustness and fruitfulness of a theory of universals in individual human values. In A. Tamayo & J. B. Porto (Eds.), Valores e comportamento nas organizações [Values and behavior in organizations] (pp. 56–95). Petrópolis, BRA: Vozes.
Schwartz, S. H. (2006). A theory of cultural value orientations: Explications and applications. Comparative Sociology, 5, 137–182.
Schwartz, S. H., Melech, G., Lehmann, A., Burgess, S., & Harris, M. (2001). Extending the crosscultural validity of the theory of basic human values with a different method of measurement. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 32, 519–542.
Sims, R. L., & Kroeck, K. G. (1994). The influence of ethical fit on employee satisfaction, commitment and turnover. Journal of Business Ethics, 13, 939–947.
Smith, E. R., Coats, S., & Walling, D. (1999). Overlapping mental representations of self, in-group, and partner: Further response time evidence and a connectionist model. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 25, 873–882.
Snyder, M., & Cantor, N. (1979). Testing hypotheses about other people: The use of historical knowledge. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 15, 330–342.
Snyder, M., & Swann, W. B., Jr. (1978a). Behavioral confirmation in social interaction: From social perception to social reality. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 14, 148–162.
Snyder, M., & Swann, W. B., Jr. (1978b). Hypothesis-testing processes in social interaction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 36, 1202–1212.
Sorrentino, R. M., Seligman, C., & Battista, M. E. (2007). Optimal distinctiveness, values, and uncertainty orientation: Individual differences on perceptions of self and group identity. Self and Identity, 6, 322–339.
Suar, D., & Khuntia, R. (2010). Influence of personal values and value congruence on unethical practices and work behavior. Journal of Business Ethics, 97, 443–460.
van Dick, R., Wagner, U., Stellmacher, J., & Christ, O. (2004). The utility of a broader conceptualization of organizational identification: Which aspects really matter? Journal of Occupational & Organizational Psychology, 77, 171–191.
van Quaquebeke, N., & Brodbeck, F. C. (2008). Entwicklung und erste Validierung zweier Instrumente zur Erfassung von Führungskräfte-Kategorisierung im deutschsprachigen Raum [Development and first validation of two scales to measure leader categorization in German-speaking countries]. Zeitschrift für Arbeits- und Organisationspsychologie, 52, 70–80.
van Quaquebeke, N., Henrich, D. C., & Eckloff, T. (2007). “It’s not tolerance I’m asking for, it’s respect!” A conceptual framework to differentiate between tolerance, acceptance and respect. Gruppendynamik und Organisationsberatung, 38, 185–200.
van Quaquebeke, N., Kerschreiter, R., Buxton, A. E., & van Dick, R. (2010). Two lighthouses to navigate: Effects of ideal and counter-ideal values on follower identification and satisfaction with their leaders. Journal of Business Ethics, 93, 293–305.
van Quaquebeke, N., van Knippenberg, D., & Brodbeck, F. C. (2011). More than meets the eye: The role of subordinates’ self-perceptions in leader categorization processes. The Leadership Quarterly, 10, 367–382.
van Quaquebeke, N., Zenker, S., & Eckloff, T. (2009). Find out how much it means to me! The importance of interpersonal respect in work values compared to perceived organizational practices. Journal of Business Ethics, 89, 423–431.
Verplanken, B. (2004). Value congruence and job satisfaction among nurses: A human relations perspective. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 41, 599–605.
Verplanken, B., & Holland, R. W. (2002). Motivated decision making: Effects of activation and self-centrality of values on choices and behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82, 434–447.
Verquer, M. L., Beehr, T. A., & Wagner, S. H. (2003). A meta-analysis of relations between person-organization fit and work attitudes. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 63, 473–489.
Yik, M. S. M., & Tang, C. S. (1996). Linking personality and values. Personality and Individual Differences, 21, 767–774.
Yukl, G. A. (2010). Leadership in organizations (7th ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Open Access
This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Open Access This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0), which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.
About this article
Cite this article
Graf, M.M., Van Quaquebeke, N. & Van Dick, R. Two Independent Value Orientations: Ideal and Counter-Ideal Leader Values and Their Impact on Followers’ Respect for and Identification with Their Leaders. J Bus Ethics 104, 185–195 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-011-0897-7
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-011-0897-7