Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Henrique J. Ribeiro (ed): Inside Arguments. Logic and the Study of Argumentation

Cambridge Scholars Publishing, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK, 2012, vii + 405 pp

  • Published:
Argumentation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Bigi, S., and S. Greco Morasso. 2012. Keywords, frames and the reconstruction of material starting points in argumentation. Journal of Pragmatics 44(10): 1135–1149.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dung, P.M. 1995. On the acceptability of arguments and its fundamental role in nonmonotonic reasoning, logic programming and N-person games. Artificial Intelligence 77: 321–357.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ennis, R.H. 1982. Identifying implicit assumptions. Synthese 51: 61–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Finocchiaro, M.A. 2005. Arguments about arguments. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, J.B. 2005. Acceptable premises: An epistemic approach to an informal logic problem. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lorenzen, P. 1987. Constructive Philosophy (translated by K.R. Pavlovic). Amherst: University of Massachusetts Press.

  • Lorenzen, P., and K. Lorenz. 1978. Dialogische Logik. Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rigotti, E. 2008. Locus a causa finali. L’analisi linguistica e letteraria 16 (2): 559–576 (special issue, ed. G. Gobber et al.).

  • Rocci, A. 2006. Pragmatic inference and argumentation in intercultural communication. Intercultural Pragmatics 3(4): 409–443.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Eemeren, F. H., and R. Grootendorst. 1992. Argumentation, Communication and Fallacies: A Pragma-dialectical Perspective. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

  • Walton, D. 2001. Enthymemes, common knowledge, and plausible inference. Philosophy and Rhetoric 34: 93–112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walton, D. 2008. The three bases for the enthymeme: A dialogical theory. Journal of Applied Logic 6(3): 361–379.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Institute of Argumentation, Linguistics and Semiotics, Faculty of Communication Sciences, Università della Svizzera italiana, Via G. Buffi 13, 6900, Lugano, Switzerland

    Sara Greco Morasso

Authors
  1. Sara Greco Morasso
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sara Greco Morasso.

Additional information

Henrique J. Ribeiro is an Associate Professor at the Faculty of Letters of the University of Coimbra, Portugal, where he teaches logic, rhetoric and argumentation theory.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Greco Morasso, S. Henrique J. Ribeiro (ed): Inside Arguments. Logic and the Study of Argumentation. Argumentation 27, 453–458 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10503-013-9297-8

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10503-013-9297-8

Search

Navigation