Abstract
Recent debates over the persistence of family farms have focused on the importance of “naturalistic” obstacles to the capitalist development of agriculture. According to these arguments, the existence of these barriers in some realms of agricultural production precludes the development of wage labor. I argue, however, that in many instances these obstacles are based primarily on political factors. To demonstrate this thesis I illustrate how the tobacco program until recently has proved to be an obstacle to consolidation and structural change in tobacco production. The tobacco program has conditioned the extent of technological development and structural change in tobacco production. From the 1940s to the 1970s, the tobacco program maintained a system of small-scale producers and discouraged technological change in the industry. Changes in the program in the 1970s and 1980s, however, have contributed to the rapid mechanization and structural change among tobacco producers. Many of the “obstacles” to consolidation were overcome not by technological change, but by weakened political support for the tobacco program. These results suggest that in addition to economic and technological considerations, we need to assess more carefully the political foundations of the capitalist development of agriculture.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Badge Anthony J., 1980.Prosperity Road: The New Deal, Tobacco, and North Carolina. Chapel Hill: The University of North Carolina Press.
Blackwell, Gordon W., 1934. “The displaced tenant farm in North Carolina.”Social Forces. 13(October):65–73.
Block, Fred, 1977. “The ruling class does not rule: notes on the Marxist theory of the state.”Socialist Revolution. 7(3):6–28.
Bonanno, Alessandro, 1987.Small Farms: Persistence With Legitimation. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
Carnoy, Martin, 1984.The State and Political Theory. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Chayanov, A. V., 1966.The Theory of Peasant Economy, D. Thorner, R. E. F. Smith and B. Kerblay, trans. and eds. Homewood, Ill.: Richard Irwin.
Clairmonte, Frederick F., 1979. “World tobacco: the dynamics of oligopolistic annexation.”Journal of Contemporary Asia. 9(3):255–273.
Comptroller General of the United States, 1982. “Tobacco program's production rights and effects on competition.” Washington, D.C.: General Accounting Office.
Daniel, Pete, 1985.Breaking the Land. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
de Janvry, Alain, 1980. “Social differentiation in agriculture and the ideology of neopopulism.” Pp. 155–168 inThe Rural Sociology of the Advanced Societies, Fred Buttel and Howard Newby, eds. Montclair, NJ: Allanheld, Osmun and Company.
Domhoff, William, 1978.The Powers That Be. New York: Random House.
Finegold, Kenneth, 1982. “From agrarianism to adjustment: the political origins of New Deal agricultural policy.”Politics and Society. 11(Winter):1–28.
Fligstein, Neil, 1981.Going North. New York: Academic Press.
——, 1986. “The underdevelopment of the South: state and agriculture, 1865–1900.” Pp. 60–103 inStudies in the Transformation of U.S. Agriculture, A. E. Havens, ed. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
Ford Arthur M., 1973.Political Economics of Rural Poverty in the South. Cambridge MA: Ballinger Publishing Company.
Friedland, William H., 1984. “Commodity systems analysis: an approach to the sociology of agriculture.” Pp. 221–235 inResearch in Rural Sociology and Development, vol. I, Harry K. Schwarzweller ed. Greenwich CT: JAI Press.
Friedland, William H., Amy E. Barton, and Robert J. Thomas, 1981.Manufacturing Green Gold. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Gilbert, Jess and Raymond Akor, 1988. “Increasing structural divergence in U.S. dairying: California and Wisconsin since 1950.”Rural Sociology. 53(1): 56–72.
Gilles, Jere Lee and Michael Dalecki, 1988. “Rural well-being and agricultural change in two farming regions.”Rural Sociology. 53(1):40–55.
Goodman, D. B. Sorj, and J. Wilkinson, 1987.From Farming to Biotechnology. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
Goss, Kevin F., 1979. “Consequences of diffusion of innovations.”Rural Sociology. 44(4):754–772.
Goss, Kevin F., Richard D. Rodefeld, and Frederick H. Buttel, 1980. “The political economy of class structure in U.S. agriculture: A theoretical outline.” Pp. 83–132 in Frederick H. Buttel and Howard Newby (eds.).The Rural Sociology of The Advanced Societies. Montclair, N.J.: Allenheld, Osmun & Co.
Green, Gary P., 1987a. “Class and class interests in agriculture: support for New Deal farm programs among tobacco producers.”Sociological Quarterly. 28(Winter):561–76.
——, 1987b. “The political economy of flue-cured tobacco production.”Rural Sociology. 52(2):221–41.
Grise, Verner N., 1981.Trends in Flue-Cured Tobacco Farming. AER-470. United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service. Washington, D.C.
——, 1984.Tobacco: Background for 1985 Farm Legislation. Agriculture Information Bulletin No. 468, Economic Research Service, United States Department of Agriculture. Washington, D.C.
Guither, Harold D., 1972.Heritage of Plenty. Danville, IL: The Interstate Printers and Publishers Inc.
Hawks, S. N., Jr., and W. K. Collins, 1983.Principles of Flue-Cured Tobacco Production. Raleigh, NC: S. N. Hawks and W. K. Collins.
James David R., 1986. “Local state structure and the transformation of southern agriculture.” Pp. 150–178 inStudies in the Transformation of U.S. Agriculture, A. E. Havens, ed. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
Jessop, Bob, 1982.The Capitalist State. New York: New York University Press.
Kloppenburg, Jack Ralph Jr., 1988.First the Seed. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Lenin, V. I., 1899.The Development of Capitalism in Russia. Moscow: Progress.
McMichael, Philip, 1987. “Bringing circulation back into agricultural political economy: analyzing the antebellum plantation in its world market context.”Rural Sociology. 52(2):242–263.
Mann, Charles, 1975.Tobacco: The Ants and the Elephants. Salt Lake City, UT: Olympus Publishing Company.
Mann, Susan, 1987. “The rise of wage labor in the cotton South: a global analysis.”Journal of Peasant Studies. 14(2):226.42.
Mann, Susan, and James Dickinson, 1978. “Obstacles for the development of a capitalist agriculture.”Journal of Peasant Studies. 5(4):446–481.
——, 1987. “One furrow forward, two furrows back: a Marx-Weber synthesis for rural sociology?”Rural Sociology. 52(2): 264–285.
Miliband, Ralf, 1977.Marxism and Politics. Oxford, England: Oxford Univ. Press.
Mooney Patrick H., 1982. “Labor time, production time and capitalist development in agriculture: a reconsideration of the Mann-Dickinson thesis.”Sociologia Ruralis. 22(3/4):279–292.
——, 1983. “Toward a class analysis of Midwestern agriculture.”Rural Sociology. 48(4):563–84.
——. 1987. “Desperately seeking: one-dimensional Mann and Dickinson.”Rural Sociology. 52(2):296–303.
Noble, David, 1977.America by Design: Science Technology. and the Rise of Corporate Capitalism. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.
Ogburn, W. F., 1922.Social Change. B. W. Huebsch.
Perelman, Michael, 1977.Farming for Profit in a Hungry World. New York: Allanheld, Osmun Co.
Pfeffer, Max J., 1983. “Social origins of three systems of farm production in the United States.”Rural Sociology. 48(Winter):540–62.
Poulantzas, Nicos, 1974.Political Power and Social Classes. London: New Left Books.
Rogers, Everett, 1983.Diffusion of Innovations. New York: Free Press.
Schulman, Michael, Patricia Garrett, and Regina Luginbuhl, 1985. “Dimensions of internal stratification of smallholders: insights from North Carolina piedmont counties.”Rural Sociology. 50(2):251–61.
Singer, Edward G., Gary P. Green, and Jere L. Gilles, 1983. “The Mann-Dickinson thesis: reject or revise?”Sociologia Ruralis. 23(3/4):276–287.
Skocpol, Theda, 1980. “Political response to capitalist crisis: neo-Marxist theories of the state and the case of the New Deal.”Politics and Society. 10(Spring):155–202.
——, 1985. “Bringing the state back in: strategies of analysis in current research.” Pp. 3–43 inBringing the State Back In, P. Evans, D. Rueschemeyer, and T. Skocpol, eds. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
United States Department of Commerce, 1952.United States Census of Agriculture: 1950. Bureau of the Census. Volume 1, Part 16. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office.
Vogeler, Ingolf, 1981.The myth of The Family Farm: Agribusiness Dominance of U.S. Agriculture. Boulder, Co: Westview Press.
Wright, Erik Olin, 1978.Class, Crisis, and the State. London: New Left Books.
Additional information
Gary P. Green is an Associate Professor in the Department of Sociology and the Institute of Community and Area Development at the University of Georgia. His research concentrates on the sociology of agriculture, political economy of rural development, and economic development and community change. He is currently involved in research on the effectiveness of local economic development strategies and self-development strategies among rural communities.
I appreciate the comments and suggestions of Leann Tigges and two anonymous reviewers.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Green, G.P. State, class, and technology in tobacco production. Agric Hum Values 6, 54–61 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02217814
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02217814