Skip to main content
Log in

State, class, and technology in tobacco production

  • Articles
  • Published:
Agriculture and Human Values Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Recent debates over the persistence of family farms have focused on the importance of “naturalistic” obstacles to the capitalist development of agriculture. According to these arguments, the existence of these barriers in some realms of agricultural production precludes the development of wage labor. I argue, however, that in many instances these obstacles are based primarily on political factors. To demonstrate this thesis I illustrate how the tobacco program until recently has proved to be an obstacle to consolidation and structural change in tobacco production. The tobacco program has conditioned the extent of technological development and structural change in tobacco production. From the 1940s to the 1970s, the tobacco program maintained a system of small-scale producers and discouraged technological change in the industry. Changes in the program in the 1970s and 1980s, however, have contributed to the rapid mechanization and structural change among tobacco producers. Many of the “obstacles” to consolidation were overcome not by technological change, but by weakened political support for the tobacco program. These results suggest that in addition to economic and technological considerations, we need to assess more carefully the political foundations of the capitalist development of agriculture.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Badge Anthony J., 1980.Prosperity Road: The New Deal, Tobacco, and North Carolina. Chapel Hill: The University of North Carolina Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blackwell, Gordon W., 1934. “The displaced tenant farm in North Carolina.”Social Forces. 13(October):65–73.

    Google Scholar 

  • Block, Fred, 1977. “The ruling class does not rule: notes on the Marxist theory of the state.”Socialist Revolution. 7(3):6–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bonanno, Alessandro, 1987.Small Farms: Persistence With Legitimation. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carnoy, Martin, 1984.The State and Political Theory. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chayanov, A. V., 1966.The Theory of Peasant Economy, D. Thorner, R. E. F. Smith and B. Kerblay, trans. and eds. Homewood, Ill.: Richard Irwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clairmonte, Frederick F., 1979. “World tobacco: the dynamics of oligopolistic annexation.”Journal of Contemporary Asia. 9(3):255–273.

    Google Scholar 

  • Comptroller General of the United States, 1982. “Tobacco program's production rights and effects on competition.” Washington, D.C.: General Accounting Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daniel, Pete, 1985.Breaking the Land. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Janvry, Alain, 1980. “Social differentiation in agriculture and the ideology of neopopulism.” Pp. 155–168 inThe Rural Sociology of the Advanced Societies, Fred Buttel and Howard Newby, eds. Montclair, NJ: Allanheld, Osmun and Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Domhoff, William, 1978.The Powers That Be. New York: Random House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Finegold, Kenneth, 1982. “From agrarianism to adjustment: the political origins of New Deal agricultural policy.”Politics and Society. 11(Winter):1–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fligstein, Neil, 1981.Going North. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ——, 1986. “The underdevelopment of the South: state and agriculture, 1865–1900.” Pp. 60–103 inStudies in the Transformation of U.S. Agriculture, A. E. Havens, ed. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ford Arthur M., 1973.Political Economics of Rural Poverty in the South. Cambridge MA: Ballinger Publishing Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedland, William H., 1984. “Commodity systems analysis: an approach to the sociology of agriculture.” Pp. 221–235 inResearch in Rural Sociology and Development, vol. I, Harry K. Schwarzweller ed. Greenwich CT: JAI Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedland, William H., Amy E. Barton, and Robert J. Thomas, 1981.Manufacturing Green Gold. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilbert, Jess and Raymond Akor, 1988. “Increasing structural divergence in U.S. dairying: California and Wisconsin since 1950.”Rural Sociology. 53(1): 56–72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilles, Jere Lee and Michael Dalecki, 1988. “Rural well-being and agricultural change in two farming regions.”Rural Sociology. 53(1):40–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodman, D. B. Sorj, and J. Wilkinson, 1987.From Farming to Biotechnology. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goss, Kevin F., 1979. “Consequences of diffusion of innovations.”Rural Sociology. 44(4):754–772.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goss, Kevin F., Richard D. Rodefeld, and Frederick H. Buttel, 1980. “The political economy of class structure in U.S. agriculture: A theoretical outline.” Pp. 83–132 in Frederick H. Buttel and Howard Newby (eds.).The Rural Sociology of The Advanced Societies. Montclair, N.J.: Allenheld, Osmun & Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Green, Gary P., 1987a. “Class and class interests in agriculture: support for New Deal farm programs among tobacco producers.”Sociological Quarterly. 28(Winter):561–76.

    Google Scholar 

  • ——, 1987b. “The political economy of flue-cured tobacco production.”Rural Sociology. 52(2):221–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grise, Verner N., 1981.Trends in Flue-Cured Tobacco Farming. AER-470. United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service. Washington, D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • ——, 1984.Tobacco: Background for 1985 Farm Legislation. Agriculture Information Bulletin No. 468, Economic Research Service, United States Department of Agriculture. Washington, D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guither, Harold D., 1972.Heritage of Plenty. Danville, IL: The Interstate Printers and Publishers Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hawks, S. N., Jr., and W. K. Collins, 1983.Principles of Flue-Cured Tobacco Production. Raleigh, NC: S. N. Hawks and W. K. Collins.

    Google Scholar 

  • James David R., 1986. “Local state structure and the transformation of southern agriculture.” Pp. 150–178 inStudies in the Transformation of U.S. Agriculture, A. E. Havens, ed. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jessop, Bob, 1982.The Capitalist State. New York: New York University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kloppenburg, Jack Ralph Jr., 1988.First the Seed. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lenin, V. I., 1899.The Development of Capitalism in Russia. Moscow: Progress.

    Google Scholar 

  • McMichael, Philip, 1987. “Bringing circulation back into agricultural political economy: analyzing the antebellum plantation in its world market context.”Rural Sociology. 52(2):242–263.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mann, Charles, 1975.Tobacco: The Ants and the Elephants. Salt Lake City, UT: Olympus Publishing Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mann, Susan, 1987. “The rise of wage labor in the cotton South: a global analysis.”Journal of Peasant Studies. 14(2):226.42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mann, Susan, and James Dickinson, 1978. “Obstacles for the development of a capitalist agriculture.”Journal of Peasant Studies. 5(4):446–481.

    Google Scholar 

  • ——, 1987. “One furrow forward, two furrows back: a Marx-Weber synthesis for rural sociology?”Rural Sociology. 52(2): 264–285.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miliband, Ralf, 1977.Marxism and Politics. Oxford, England: Oxford Univ. Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mooney Patrick H., 1982. “Labor time, production time and capitalist development in agriculture: a reconsideration of the Mann-Dickinson thesis.”Sociologia Ruralis. 22(3/4):279–292.

    Google Scholar 

  • ——, 1983. “Toward a class analysis of Midwestern agriculture.”Rural Sociology. 48(4):563–84.

    Google Scholar 

  • ——. 1987. “Desperately seeking: one-dimensional Mann and Dickinson.”Rural Sociology. 52(2):296–303.

    Google Scholar 

  • Noble, David, 1977.America by Design: Science Technology. and the Rise of Corporate Capitalism. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ogburn, W. F., 1922.Social Change. B. W. Huebsch.

  • Perelman, Michael, 1977.Farming for Profit in a Hungry World. New York: Allanheld, Osmun Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pfeffer, Max J., 1983. “Social origins of three systems of farm production in the United States.”Rural Sociology. 48(Winter):540–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Poulantzas, Nicos, 1974.Political Power and Social Classes. London: New Left Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, Everett, 1983.Diffusion of Innovations. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schulman, Michael, Patricia Garrett, and Regina Luginbuhl, 1985. “Dimensions of internal stratification of smallholders: insights from North Carolina piedmont counties.”Rural Sociology. 50(2):251–61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singer, Edward G., Gary P. Green, and Jere L. Gilles, 1983. “The Mann-Dickinson thesis: reject or revise?”Sociologia Ruralis. 23(3/4):276–287.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skocpol, Theda, 1980. “Political response to capitalist crisis: neo-Marxist theories of the state and the case of the New Deal.”Politics and Society. 10(Spring):155–202.

    Google Scholar 

  • ——, 1985. “Bringing the state back in: strategies of analysis in current research.” Pp. 3–43 inBringing the State Back In, P. Evans, D. Rueschemeyer, and T. Skocpol, eds. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • United States Department of Commerce, 1952.United States Census of Agriculture: 1950. Bureau of the Census. Volume 1, Part 16. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vogeler, Ingolf, 1981.The myth of The Family Farm: Agribusiness Dominance of U.S. Agriculture. Boulder, Co: Westview Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wright, Erik Olin, 1978.Class, Crisis, and the State. London: New Left Books.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Additional information

Gary P. Green is an Associate Professor in the Department of Sociology and the Institute of Community and Area Development at the University of Georgia. His research concentrates on the sociology of agriculture, political economy of rural development, and economic development and community change. He is currently involved in research on the effectiveness of local economic development strategies and self-development strategies among rural communities.

I appreciate the comments and suggestions of Leann Tigges and two anonymous reviewers.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Green, G.P. State, class, and technology in tobacco production. Agric Hum Values 6, 54–61 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02217814

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02217814

Keywords

Navigation