Abstract
To investigate whether global or local visual information is processed first, several researchers have used a large letter (global information) made up of smaller letters (local information) and measured speed of response and interference effects between global and local components. Kinchla and Wolfe (1979) argued that processing was neither invariably top-down (global-to-local) nor bottom-up (local-to-global). Instead, they argued that the fastest identification of letter shapes is given at an optimal visual angle of about 2° and proposed a middle-out processing model wherein elements of optimal size are processed first. In the present study, three-level figures were used in a direct test of that hypothesis, with subjects monitoring all three levels to detect target letters occurring at any level. The results are not compatible with any of the three orders of processing that have been proposed, and an interpretation in terms of the discriminability of the information available at each level is advocated. It is concluded that the two-level paradigm with letters is inadequate for investigations of the order of processing.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Grice, G. R., Canham, L., & Boroughs, J. M. (1983). Forest before trees? It depends where you look. Perception & Psychophysics, 33, 121–128.
Kinchla, R. A., & Wolfe, J. M. (1979). The order of visual processing: “Top-down,” “bottom-up,” or “middle-out.” Perception & Psychophysics, 25, 225–231.
Lamb, M. R., & Robertson, L. C. (1989). Do response time advantage and interference reflect the order of processing of global- and local-level information? Perception & Psychophysics, 46, 254–258.
Martin, M. (1979). Local and global processing: The role of sparsity. Memory & Cognition, 7, 476–484.
Navon, D. (1977). Forest before trees: The precedence of global features in visual perception. Cognitive Psychology, 9, 353–383.
Ward, L. M. (1982). Determinants of attention to local and global features of visual forms. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 8, 562–581.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
J. Greaney holds a Research Studentship from the Science and Engineering Research Council. We are grateful to Westland Helicopters Ltd. for their additional support for our work.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Greaney, J., MacRae, A.W. The order of visual processing: Top-down, bottom-up, middle-out, or none of these?. Bull. Psychon. Soc. 30, 255–257 (1992). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03330459
Received:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03330459