Abstract
We develop an account of laboratory models, which have been central to the group selection controversy. We compare arguments for group selection in nature with Darwin's arguments for natural selection to argue that laboratory models provide important grounds for causal claims about selection. Biologists get information about causes and cause-effect relationships in the laboratory because of the special role their own causal agency plays there. They can also get information about patterns of effects and antecedent conditions in nature. But to argue that some cause is actually responsible in nature, they require an inference from knowledge of causes in the laboratory context and of effects in the natural context. This process, cause detection, forms the core of an analogical argument for group selection. We discuss the differing roles of mathematical and laboratory models in constructing selective explanations at the group level and apply our discussion to the units of selection controversy to distinguish between the related problems of cause determination and evaluation of evidence. Because laboratory models are at the intersection of the two problems, their study is crucial for framing a coherent theory of explanation for evolutionary biology.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ackermann, R.: 1985, Data, Instruments, and Theory, Princeton University Press, Princeton.
Arnold, S. and M. Wade: 1984, ‘On the Measurement of Natural and Sexual Selection: Theory’, Evolution 38, 709–719.
Brandon, R.: 1982, ‘The Levels of Selection’, in P. Asquith and T. Nickles (eds.), PSA 1982, vol. 1, Philosophy of Science Association, East Lansing, pp. 181–206.
Brandon, R. and R. Burian (eds.): 1984, Genes, Organisms, Populations: Controversies over the Units of Selection, MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass.
Borell, M.: 1987a, ‘Instruments and an Independent Physiology: The Harvard Physiological Laboratory, 1871–1906’, in Physiology in the American Context, 1850–1940, American Physiological Society, U.S.A., pp. 293–321.
Borell, M.: 1987b, ‘Instrumentation and the Rise of Modern Physiology’, Science and Technology Studies 5, in press.
Burian, R.: 1987, ‘Realist Methodology in Contemporary Genetics’, in N. Nersessian (ed.), The Process of Science, Martinus Nijhoff, Dordrecht, pp. 195–210.
Craig, D.: 1982, ‘Group Selection Versus Individual Selection: an Experimental Analysis’,Evolution 36, 271–282.
Damuth, J. and I. Heisler: 1987, ‘Alternative Formulations of Multilevel Selection’, Philosophy of Science, submitted.
Darwin, C.: 1859, On the Origin of Species, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass., 1964.
Endler, J.: 1986, Natural Selection in the Wild, Princeton University Press, Princeton.
Falconer, R.: 1981, Introduction to Quantitative Genetics, 2nd Ed., Longman, London.
Fisher, R.: 1918, ‘The correlation between relatives on the supposition of Mendelian inheritance’, Transactions of the Royal Society of Edinburgh 52, 399–433.
Fisher, R.: 1930. The Genetical Theory of Natural Selection, Oxford University Press: Oxford.
Fujimura, J.: 1987, ‘Constructing ‘Do-able’ Problems in Cancer Research: Articulating Alignment’, Social Studies of Science 17, 257–293.
Gerson, E.: 1983, ‘Scientific Work and Social Worlds’, Knowledge 4, 357–377.
Gerson, E. and S. Star: 1987, ‘Representation and Representation in Scientific Works’, MS.
Goodnight, C.: 1985, ‘The Influence of Environmental Variation on Group and Individual Selection in a Cress’, Evolution, 39: 545–558.
Hodge, M.: 1977, ‘The Structure and Strategy of Darwin's ‘Long Argument’’, British Journal for the History of Science 10, 237–246.
Hodge, M.: 1983, ‘The Development of Darwin's General BiologicalTheorizing’, in D. S. Bendall (ed.), Evolution from Molecules to Men, Cambridge University Press, New York, pp. 42–62.
Hodge, M.: 1987, ‘Natural Selection as a Causal, Empirical, and Probabilistic Theory’, in L. Kruger, G. Gigerenzer and M. Moŕgan (eds.), The Probabilistic Revolution, vol. 2, MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass. pp. 233–270.
Kavaloski, V.: 1974, The Vera Causa Principle: a Historico-philosophical Study of a Metatheoretical concept from Newton Through Darwin, Ph.D. dissertation, University of Chicago.
Lande, R.: 1985, ‘The Fixation of Chromosomal Rearrangements in a Subdivided Population with Local Extinction and Colonization’, Heredity 54, 323–332.
Lande, R. and S. Arnold: 1983, ‘The Measurement of Selection on Correlated Characters’, Evolution 37, 1210–1226.
Latour, B. and S. Woolgar: 1979, Laboratory Life, Sage Publications, Beverly Hills.
Latour, B.: 1987, Science in Action, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass.
Lewontin, R.: 1970, ‘The Units of Selection’, Annual Reviews of Ecology and Systematics 1, 1–17.
Lewontin, R.: 1974, ‘The Analysis of Variance and the Analysis of Causes’, American Journal of Human Genetics 26, 400–411.
Lewontin, R. and L. Dunn: 1960, ‘The Evolutionary Dynamics of a Polymorphism in the House Mouse’, Genetics 45, 705–722.
Lloyd, E.: 1984, ‘A Semantic Approach to the Structure of Population Genetics’, Philosophy of Science 51, 242–264.
Lloyd, E.: 1986, ‘Evaluation of Evidence in Group Selection Debates’, in A. Fine and P. Machamer (eds.), PSA 1986, vol. 1, Philosophy of Science Association, East Lansing, pp. 483–493.
Lloyd, E.: 1986b, ‘Evaluation of Evidence in Units of Selection Controveries’, Philosophy of Science, in press.
Maynard Smith, J.: 1964, ‘Group Selection and Kin Selection’, Nature 201, 1145–1147.
Maynard Smith, J.: 1976, ‘Group Selection’, Quarterly Review of Biology 51, 277–283.
Mills, S. and J. Beatty: 1979, ‘The Propensity Interpretation of Fitness’, Philosophy of Science 46, 263–286.
Neyman, J., T. Park and E. Scott: 1956, ‘Struggle for Existence: The Tribolium Model: Biological and Statistical Aspects’, in J. Neyman (ed.), Proceedings of the Third Berkeley Symposium on Mathematical Statistics and Probability, vol. 4, University of California Press, Berkeley, pp. 41–79.
Newton, I.: 1686, ‘Rules of Reasoning in Philosophy’, reprinted in H. Thayer (ed.), 1974, Newton's Philosophy of Nature, Hafner: New York, p. 3.
Niles, H.: 1922, ‘Correlation, Causation, and Wright's Theory of “Path Coefficients”’, Genetics 7, 258–273.
Park, T.: 1941, ‘The Laboratory Population as a Test of a Comprehensive Ecological System’, Quarterly Review of Biology 16, 274–293, 440–461.
Park, T.: 1948, ‘Experimental Studies of Interspecies Competition I. Competition Between Populations of the Flour Beetles, Tribolium confusum Duval and Tribolium castaneum Herbst’, Ecological Monographs 18, 265–308.
Park, T.: 1954, ‘Competition: An Experimental and Statistical Study’, in O. Kempthorne, T. Bancroft, J. Gowen and J. Lush (eds.), Statistic and Mathematics in Biology, Iowa State College Press, Ames, pp. 175–195.
Park, T.: 1962, ‘Beetles, Competition, and Populations’, Science 138, 1369–1375.
Sober, E.: 1981, ‘Holism, Individualism, and Units of Selection’, in P. Asquith and R. Giere (eds.), PSA 1980, vol. 2, Philosophy of Science ASsociation, East Lansing, pp. 93–121.
Sober, E.: 1983, ‘Equilibrium Explanation’, Philosophical Studies 43, 201–210.
Sober, E.: 1984, The Nature of Selection, MIT Press, Cambride, Mass.
Sober, E. and R. Lewontin: 1982, ‘Artifact, Cause, and Genic Selection’, Philosophy of Science 47, 157–180.
Star, S.: 1983, ‘Simplification in Scientific Work: AnExample from Neuroscience Research’, Social Studies of Science 13, 208–226.
Star, S.: 1985, ‘Scientific Work and Uncertainty’, Social Studies of Science 15, 391–427.
Star, S. and E. Gerson: 1986, ‘The Management and Dynamics of Anomalies in Scientific Work’, The Sociological Quarterly 28, 147–169.
Suppes, P.: 1960, ‘A Comparison of the Meaning and Uses of Models in Mathematics and the Empirical Sciences’, Synthese 12, 287–301.
Suppes, P.: 1962, ‘Models of Data’, in E. Nagel, P. Suppes, and A. Tarski (eds.), Logic, Methodology and Philosophy of Science, Stanford University Press, Stanford, pp. 252–261.
Suppes, P.: 1977, ‘The Structure of Theories and the Analysis of Data’, in F. Suppe (ed.), The Structure of Scientific Theories 2nd. Ed., University of Illinois Press, Urbana, pp. 266–288.
Teller, P.: 1977, ‘Indicative Introduction’, Philosophical Studies 31, 173–195.
Uyenoyama, M. and M. Feldman: 1980, ‘Theories of Kin and Group Selection: a Population Genetics Perspective’, Theoretical Population Biology 17, 380–414.
van Fraassen, B.: 1980, The Scientific Image, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
Wade, M.: 1976, ‘Group Selection Among Laboratory Populations of Tribolium’, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, U.S.A. 73, 4604–4607.
Wade, M.: 1977, ‘An Experimental Study of Group Selection’, Evolution 31, 134–153.
Wade, M.:1978, ‘A Critical Review of the Models of Group Selection’, Quarterly Review of Biology 53, 101–114.
Williams, G.: 1966, Adaptation and Natural Selection. Princeton University Press, Princeton.
Wilson, D.: 1980, The Natural Selection of Populations and Communities, Benjamin/Cummings, Menlo Park.
Wilson, D.: 1983, ‘The Group Selection Controversy: History and Current Status’, Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 14, 159–188.
Wimsatt, W.: 1970, review of G. C. Williams' Adaptation and Natural Selection, Philosophy of Science 37, 620–623.
Wimsatt, W.: 1980, ‘Reductionistic Research Strategies and Their Biases in the Units of Selection Controversy’, in T. Nickles (ed.), Scientific Discovery, vol. 2. Reidel, Dordrecht, pp. 213–259.
Wimsatt, W.: 1981a, ‘The Units of Selection and the Structure of the Multi-level Genome’, in P. Asquith and R. Giere (eds.), PSA 1980, vol. 2, Philosophy of Sciene Association, East Lansing, pp. 122–183.
Wimsatt, W.: 1981b, ‘Robustness, Reliability, and Overdetermination’, in M. Brewer and B. Collins (eds.), Scientific Inquiry and the Social Sciences, Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, pp. 124–163.
Wright, S.: 1921, ‘Correlation and Causation’, Journal of Agricultural Research 20, 557–585.
Wright, S.: 1931, ‘Evolution in Mendelian Populations’, Genetics 16, 97–159.
Wright, S.: 1932, ‘The Roles of Mutation, Inbreeding, Crossbreeding and Selection in Evolution’, Proceedings of the Sixth International Congress of Genetics 1, 356–66.
Wright, S.: 1977, Evolution and the Genetics of Populations, vol.3., University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
Wynne-Edwards, V.: 1962, Animal Dispersion in Relation to Social Behavior, Oliver and Boyd, Edinburgh.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Griesemer, J.R., Wade, M.J. Laboratory models, causal explanation and group selection. Biol Philos 3, 67–96 (1988). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00127629
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00127629