Skip to main content
Log in

Lost: One Gene Concept. Reward to Finder

  • Published:
Biology and Philosophy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  • Bateson, P.P.G.: 1991, 'Are There Principles of Behavioural Development?', in P.P.G. Bateson (ed.), The Development and Integration of Behaviour, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 19-39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bateson, P.P.G. and Martin P.: 1999, Design for a Life: How Behavior and Personality Develop, Jonathan Cape, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collins, F.: 2001, 'Glossary of Genetic Terms: Gene, [Website]', National Human Genome Research Institute. Available: http://www.nhgri.nih.gov/DIR/VIP/Glossary/ [2001, August 2].

  • Cowie, F.: 1999, What's Within? Nativism Reconsidered, Oxford University Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dawkins, R.: 1976, The Selfish Gene, Oxford University Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dawkins, R.: 1982, The Extended Phenotype: The Long Reach of the Gene, Freeman, San Francisco.

    Google Scholar 

  • Falk, R.: 2001, 'Can the Norm of Reaction Save the Gene Concept?', in R. Singh and C. Krimbas, D.B. Paul and J. Beatty (eds.), Thinking about Evolution: Historical, Philosophical and Political Perspectives, Cambridge University Press, New York, pp. 119-140.

    Google Scholar 

  • Griffiths, P.E.: 2002, 'What is Innateness?', The Monist 85(1).

  • Griffiths, P.E. and Neumann-Held, E.: 1999, 'The Many Faces of the Gene', BioScience 49(8), 656-662.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, B.K.: 1992, Evolutionary Developmental Biology, Chapman and Hall, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lickliter, R. and Berry, T.: 1990, 'The Phylogeny Fallacy', Developmental Review 10, 348-364.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moss, L.: 2001, 'Deconstructing the Gene and Reconstructing Molecular Develomental Systems', in S. Oyama, P.E. Griffiths and R.D. Gray (ed.), Cycles of Contingency: Developmental Systems and Evolution, MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass, pp. 85-97.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moss, L.: In Press 2002, What Genes Can't Do. MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neumann-Held, E.M.: 1998, 'The Gene is Dead-Long Live the Gene: Conceptualising the Gene the Constructionist Way', in P. Koslowski (ed.), Sociobiology and Bioeconomics. The Theory of Evolution in Biological and Economic Theory, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, pp. 105-137.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nijhout, H.F. and Paulsen, S.M.: 1997, 'Developmental Models and Polygenic Characters', American Naturalist 149(2), 394-405.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oyama, S.: 1990, 'The Idea of Innateness: Effects on Language and Communication Research', Developmental Psychobiology 23(7), 741-747.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sarkar, S.: 1999, 'From the Reaktionsnorm to the Adaptive Norm: The Norm of Reaction 1909-1960', Biology and Philosophy 14, 235-252.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wimsatt, W.C.: 1980, 'Reductionistic Research Strategies and Their Biases in the Units of Selection Controversy', in T. Nickles (ed.), Scientific Discovery: Case Studies, Vol. 60, D. Reidel Publishing Company, pp. 213-259.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Griffiths, P.E. Lost: One Gene Concept. Reward to Finder. Biology & Philosophy 17, 271–283 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015282905583

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015282905583

Navigation