Abstract
Molecular codes can be considered a special type of mapping among molecular species in biochemical systems. The formalization of molecular codes allows to identify these in network models of real world systems. Analyzing algorithmically identified codes leads to the observation that codes does not necessarily stand alone, but that we can identify certain relations among codes. In this paper I will define two types of relations that can occur among codes, (1) code linkage and (2) code nesting, and will discuss implications of this finding.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Barbieri, M. (2008). Biosemiotics: a new understanding of life. Naturwissenschaften, 95(7), 577–599.
Barbieri, M. (2013). The paradigms of biology. Biosemiotics, 6, 33–59.
Battail, G. (2013). Biology needs information theory. Biosemiotics, 6, 77–103.
Dittrich, P., & Fenizio, P.S.D. (2007). Chemical organization theory. Bulletin of Mathematical Biology, 69(3), 1199–1231.
Elzanowski, A., & Ostell, J. (2010). The genetic code. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Taxonomy/Utils/ wprintgc.cgi, last update: July 7, 2010. Retrieved 1 March 2011.
Fontana, W., & Buss, L.W. (1994). The arrival of the fittest: toward a theory of biological organization. Bulletin of Mathematical Biology, 56, 1–64.
Gabius, H.J. (2000). Biological information transfer beyond the genetic code: the sugar code. Naturwissenschaften, 87(3), 108–121.
Görlich, D. (2013). A formal model of molecular codes with respect to chemical reaction networks. PhD thesis, Friedrich-Schiller-Universität Jena.
Görlich, D., & Dittrich, P. (2011). Identifying molecular organic codes in reaction networks. In G. Kampis, I. Karsai, E. Szathméry (Eds.), Advances in artificial life. Darwin meets von Neumann. Lecture notes in computer science ( Vol. 5777, pp. 305–312). Heidelberg: Springer.
Görlich, D., & Dittrich, P. (2013). Molecular codes in biological and chemical reaction networks. PLoS ONE, 8(1), e54,694. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0054694.
Görlich, D., Artmann, S., Dittrich, P. (2011). Cells as semantic systems. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta, 1810(10), 914–923.
Liu, C.C., & Schultz, P.G. (2010). Adding new chemistries to the genetic code. Annual Review of Biochemistry, 79, 413–444. doi:10.1146/annurev.biochem.052308.105824.
Rüdiger, H., & Gabius, H.J. (2009). The sugar code: fundamentals of glycosciences. In The biochemical basis and coding capacity of the sugar code (pp. 3–13). Wiley-VCH.
Strahl, B.D., & Allis, C.D. (2000). The language of covalent histone modifications. Nature, 403(6765), 41–45.
Turner, B.M. (2000). Histone acetylation and an epigenetic code. Bioessays, 22(9), 836–845.
Turner, B.M. (2007). Defining an epigenetic code. Nature Cell Biology, 9(1), 2–6.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
This work was supported by the Jena School for Microbial Communication (www.jsmc.uni-jena.de).
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Görlich, D. The Relational Basis of Molecular Codes. Biosemiotics 7, 249–257 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12304-013-9194-4
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12304-013-9194-4