Abstract
The major goal of this experiment was to determine the accuracy with which subjects could predict at input their later recognition performance. Predictions were based on words varying on a number of attributes. Four categories of words were used: nonsense, abstract, concrete, and emotional. The number of words correctly recognized increased in the foregoing order although the difference between the concrete and emotional words was marginal. When all words were combined, there was a strong relationship between predicted recognition and actual recognition for words that were hits with a “very sure” confidence rating. Additionally, subjects considerably underestimated their later recognition performance. The results indicated that a new interpretation of the mechanism underlying “correct rejects” is feasible. The relevance of the results to other memory issues was also discussed.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Anderson, J. R., & Bower, G. H. Human associative memory. New York: Wiley, 1973.
Blake, M. Prediction of recognition when recall fails: Exploring the feeling of knowing phenomenon. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 1973, 12, 311–319.
Bower, G. H. A multicomponent theory of the memory trace. In K. W. Spence & J. T. Spence (Eds.), The psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 1). New York: Academic Press, 1967. Pp. 229–325.
Brown, R., & McNeill, D. The “tip-of-the-tongue” phenomenon. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 1966, 5, 325–337.
Elias, C. S., & Perfetti, C. A. Encoding task and recognition memory: The importance of semantic encoding. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1973, 99, 151–156.
Gorman, A. M. Recognition memory for nouns as a function of abstractness and frequency. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1961, 61, 23–29.
Groninger, L. D. The role of images in recognition memory. Unpublished manuscript, University of Maryland, Baltimore County, 1974.
Morton, J. A functional model for memory. In D. A. Norman (Ed.), Models of human memory. New York: Academic Press, 1970.
Norman, D. A., & Rumelhart, D. E. A system for perception and memory. In D. A Norman (Ed.), Models of human memory. New York: Academic Press, 1970.
Paivio, A., Yuille, J. C., & Madigan, S. A. Concreteness, imagery, and meaningfulness values for 925 nouns. Journal of Experimental Psychology Monograph, 1968, 76(Pt. 2).
Posner, M. I., & Warren, R. E. Traces, concepts and conscious constructions. In A. W. Melton & E. Martin (Eds.), Coding processes in human memory. New York: Wiley, 1972.
Sadulla, E. K., & Loftness, S. Emotional images as mediators in one-trial paired-associate learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1972, 95, 295–298.
Tulving, E., & Madigan, S. A. Memory and verbal learning. Annual Review of Psychology, 1970, 21, 437–484.
Tulving, E., & Thompson, D. M. Encoding specificity and retrieval processes in episodic memory. Psychological Review, 1973, 5, 352–373.
Underwood, B. J. Attributes of memory. Psychological Review, 1969, 76, 559–573.
Underwood, B. J. Are we overloading memory? In A. W. Melton & E. Martin (Eds.), Coding processes in human memory, New York: Wiley, 1972.
Wickens, D. D. Encoding categories of words: An empirical approach to meaning. Psychological Review, 1970, 77, 1–15.
Wickens, D. D. Characteristics of word encoding. In A. W. Melton & E. Martin (Eds.), Coding processes in human memory. New York: Wiley, 1972.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
Marilyn D.Wang sponsors this paper and takes full editorial responsibility for its contents.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Groninger, L.D. Predicting recognition during storage: The capacity of the memory system to evaluate itself. Bull. Psychon. Soc. 7, 425–428 (1976). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03337236
Received:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03337236