Abstract
Much of the scientific process involves “selective ignorance”: we include certain aspects of the systems we are considering and ignore others. This is inherent in the models that we utilize as proxies for biological systems. Our goal usually is to isolate components of these systems and consider them at only certain temporal and spatial scales. The scales and questions induce different metrics for what might be considered a “good” model. The study of mathematical and computational models is replete with differing views of the terms verification, validation, corroboration, and so on. I have often argued that criteria for determination of model utility should be established prior to model construction, but this is rarely done in the application of models in biology. The question I address is whether it is feasible to develop a general approach to model evaluation, that includes all the forms of models typically applied in biology—animal and cell/tissue culture ones as well as mathematical and computational ones.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bernasconil G, Antonovics J, Biere A, Charlesworth D, Delph LF, Filatov D, Giraud T, Hood ME, Marais GAB, McCauley D, Pannell JR, Shykoff JA, Vyskot B, Wolfe LM, Widmer A (2009) Silene as a model system in ecology and evolution. Heredity 103:5–14
De Meester L, Declerk S, Stoks R, Louette G, Van de Meutter F, De Bie T, Michels E, Brendonck L (2005) Ponds and pools as model systems in conservation biology, ecology and evolutionary biology. Aquat Conserv 15:715–725
Dugatkin LE (ed) (2001) Model systems in behavioral ecology: integrating conceptual, theoretical, and empirical approaches. Princeton University Press, Princeton
Dunham MJ (2007) Synthetic ecology: a model system for cooperation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 104:1741–1742
Fuller MM, Gross LJ, Duke-Sylvester SM, Palmer M (2008) Testing the robustness of management decisions to uncertainty: everglades restoration scenarios. Ecol Appl 18:711–723
Grimm V, Revilla E, Berger U, Jeltsch F, Mooij WM, Railsback SF, Thulke H–H, Weiner J, Wiegand T, DeAngelis DL (2005) Pattern-oriented modeling of agent-based complex systems: lessons from ecology. Science 310:987–991
Grimm V, Berger U, DeAngelis D, Polhill J, Giske J, Railsback S (2010) The ODD protocol: a review and first update. Ecol Model 221:2760–2768
Gross LJ (2000) Use of computer systems and models. In: Levin SA (ed) Encyclopedia of biodiversity. Academic Press, San Diego, pp 845–853
Heil M, McKey D (2003) Protective ant-plant interactions as model systems in ecological and evolutionary research. Ann Rev Ecol Syst 34:425–453
Jessup CM, Kassen R, Fordel SE, Kerr B, Buckling A, Rainey PB, Bohannan BJM (2004) Big questions, small worlds: microbial model systems in ecology. Trends Ecol Evol 19:189–197
Kramer EM (2009) Aquilegia: a new model for plant development, ecology and evolution. Annu Rev Plant Biol 60:261–277
Lawton JH (1995) Ecological experiments with model systems. Science 269:328–331
Levins R (1968) Evolution in changing environments. Princeton University Press, Princeton
Luke NS, De Vito MJ, Shah I, El-Masri HA (2010) Development of a quantitative model of pregnane X receptor (PXR) mediated xenobiotic metabolizing enzyme induction. Bull Math Biol 72:1799–1819
Mitchell-Olds T (2001) Arabidopsis thaliana and its wild relatives: a model system for ecology and evolution. Trends Ecol Evol 16:693–700
National Research Council (1985) Models for biomedical research: a new perspective. National Academies Press, Washington, DC
National Research Council (1998) Biomedical models and resources: current needs and future opportunities. National Academies Press, Washington, DC
National Research Council (2008) Models in environmental regulatory decision making. National Academies Press, Washington, DC
National Research Council (2011) Guide for the care and use of laboratory animals, 8th edn. National Academies Press, Washington, DC
Oreskes N, Shrader-Frechette K, Belitz K (1994) Verification, validation, and confirmation of numerical models in the earth sciences. Science 263:641–646
Saikkonen K, Lehtonen P, Helander M, Koricheva J, Faeth SH (2006) Model systems in ecology: dissecting the endophyte–grass literature. Trends Plant Sci 11:1380–1385
Sornette D, Davis AB, Ide K, Vixie KR, Pisarenko V, Kamm JR (2007) Algorithm for model validation: theory and applications. Proc Nat Acad Sci USA 104:6562–6567
Srivastava DS, Kolasa J, Bengtsson J, Gonzalez A, Lawler SP, Miller TE, Munguia P, Romanuk T, Schneider DC, Trzcinski MK (2004) Are natural microcosms useful model systems for ecology? Trends Ecol Evol 19:379–384
Vrijenhoek RC (1994) Unisexual fish: model systems for studying ecology and evolution. Ann Rev Ecol Syst 25:71–96
Wall RJ, Shani M (2008) Are animal models as good as we think? Theriogenology 69:2–9
Acknowledgments
This work was supported by the National Institute for Mathematical and Biological Synthesis, which is sponsored by the National Science Foundation, the U.S. Department of Homeland Security, and the U.S. Department of Agriculture through NSF Award #EF-0832858, with additional support from the University of Tennessee, Knoxville.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Gross, L.J. Selective Ignorance and Multiple Scales in Biology: Deciding on Criteria for Model Utility. Biol Theory 8, 74–79 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13752-013-0123-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13752-013-0123-1