Skip to main content
Log in

Physics with and without the equivalence principle

  • Published:
Foundations of Physics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A differential manifold (d-manifold, for short) can be defined as a pair (M, C), where M is any set and C is a family of real functions on M which is (i) closed with respect to localization and (ii) closed with respect to superposition with smooth Euclidean functions; one also assumes that (iii) M is locally diffeomorphic to Rn. These axioms have a straightforward physical interpretation. Axioms (i) and (ii) formalize certain “compatibility conditions” which usually are supposed to be assumed tacitly by physicists. Axiom (iii) may be though of as a (nonmetric) version of Einstein's equivalence principle. By dropping axiom (iii), one obtains a more general structure called a differential space (d-space). Every subset of Rn turns out to be a d-space. Nevertheless it is mathematically a workable structure. It might be expected that somewhere in the neighborhood of the Big Bang there is a domain in which space-time is not a d-manifold but still continues to be a d-space. In such a domain we would have a physics without the (usual form of the) equivalence principle. Simple examples of d-spaces which are not d-manifolds elucidate the principal characteristics the resulting physics would manifest.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. S. W. Hawking and G. F. R. Ellis,The Large-Scale Structure of Space-Time (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1973). See also, M. Heller,Questions to the Universe (Pachart, Tucson, 1986).

    Google Scholar 

  2. C. Chevelley,Theory of Lie Groups (Princeton University Press, Princeton, 1946).

    Google Scholar 

  3. K. Nomizu,Lie Groups and Differential Geometry (The Mathematical Society of Japan, Tokyo, 1956).

    Google Scholar 

  4. R. Penrose and W. Rindler,Spinors and Space-Time. Vol. 1: Two-Spinor Calculus and Relativistic Fields (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1984), Chap. 4.

    Google Scholar 

  5. R. Sikorski,Wstep do geometrii rozniczkowej (An Introduction to Differential Geometry) (PWN, Warszawa, 1972).

    Google Scholar 

  6. M. A. Mostov, “The differentiable space structures of M. Milnor classifying spaces, simplicial complexes and geometric relations,”J. Diff. Geom. 225–293 (1979).

  7. J. Gruszczak, M. Heller, and P. Multarzynski, “On a generalization of manifolds as space-time models,”J. Math. Phys. 29, 2576–2580 (1988).

    Google Scholar 

  8. For a fuller discussion of the equivalence principle, its different formulations (weak, strong, “superstrong”), and its relationship to the affine and metric structures of space-time, see D. J. Raine and M. Heller,The Science of Space-Time (Pachart, Tucson, 1981), pp. 117–129. See also, S. Weinberg,Gravitation and Cosmology (Wiley, New York, 1972), pp. 67–88; W. Rindler,Essential Relativity, revised edition (Springer, New York, 1977), pp. 15–22.

    Google Scholar 

  9. A. Pais,“Subtle is the Lord...”—The Science and Life of Albert Einstein (Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1982), Part IV; R. Torretti,Relativity and Geometry (Pergamon Press, New York, 1983), Chap. 5.

    Google Scholar 

  10. S. W. Hawking, “The path-integral approach to quantum gravity,” inGeneral Relativity —An Einstein Centenary Survey, S. W. Hawking and W. Israel, eds. (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1979), pp. 746–789, pp. 894–895 (especially Sec. 15.10).

    Google Scholar 

  11. T. Appelquist and A. Chodos, “Quantum dynamics of Kaluza-Klein theories,”Phys. Rev. D 28, 772–784 (1983); M. B. Green, “Unification of forces and particles in superstring theories,”Nature 314, 409–414 (1985); V. M. Emel'yanov, Yu. P. Nikitin, I. L. Rozental, and A. V. Berkov, “Physics in multidimensional spaces and the beginning of metagalaxy,”Phys. Rep. 143, 1–68 (1986).

    Google Scholar 

  12. M. Demianski, Z. A. Golda, M. Heller, and M. Szdlowski, “The dimensional reduction in a multi-dimensional cosmology,”Class. Quantum Grav. 3, 1199–1205 (1986).

    Google Scholar 

  13. A. Kowalczyk, “The Riemannian curvature tensor and differentiable spaces,” inDifferential Geometry, ed. (Banach Center Publications, Vol. 12; Polish Scientific Publishers, Warsaw, 1984), pp. 163–184.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

on leave of absence from the Institute of Nuclear Physics, Department of Theoretical Physics, ul. Radzikowskiego 152, 31–342 Cracow, Poland.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gruszczak, J., Heller, M. & Multarzynski, P. Physics with and without the equivalence principle. Found Phys 19, 607–618 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00734662

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00734662

Keywords

Navigation