Abstract
David Bohm's interpretation of quantum mechanics yields a quantum potential, Q. In his early work, the effects of Q are understood in causal terms as acting through a real (quantum) field which pushes particles around. In his later work (with Basil Hiley), the causal understanding of Q appears to have been abandoned. The purpose of this paper is to understand how the use of certain metaphors leads Bohm away from a causal treatment of Q, and to evaluate the use of those metaphors.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
REFERENCES
Bohm, D.: 1952, ‘A Suggested Interpretation of the Quantum Theory in Terms of 'Hidden' Variables, I and II’, Physical Review 85, 166-193.
Bohm, D.: 1980, Wholeness and the Implicate Order, Routledge and Kegan Paul, London and New York.
Bohm, D.: 1987, ‘Chapter Two' in B. J. Hiley and F. David Peat (eds.), Quantum Implications, Routledge and Kegan Paul, London and New York.
Bohm, D. and B. J. Hiley: 1993, The Undivided Universe: An Ontological Interpretation of Quantum Theory, Routledge and Kegan Paul, London and New York.
Bohm, D. and J.-P. Vigier: 1954, ‘Model of the Causal Interpretations of Quantum Theory in Terms of a Fluid with Irregular Fluctuations’, Physical Review 96, 208-216.
Bohr, N.: 1913, ‘On the Constitutions of Atoms and Molecules’, Philosophical Magazine 26, 1-25.
Campbell, N.: 1957, Foundations of Science: The Philosophy of Theory and Experiment, Dover Publications, New York.
Cushing, J. T.: 1982, ‘Models and Methodologies in Current Theoretical High-Energy Physics’, Synthese 50, 5-101.
Cushing, J. T.: 1990, Theory Construction and Selection in Modern Physics: The S Matrix, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge and New York.
Cushing, J. T.: 1994, Quantum Mechanics: Historical Contingency and the Copenhagen Hegemony, University of Chicago Press, Chicago and London.
Dürr, D., S. Goldstein, and N. Zanghi: 1990, ‘On a Realistic Theory for Quantum Physics’, in S. Albeverio, G. Casati, U. Cattaneo, D. Merlini, and R. Moresi (eds.), Stochastic Processes, Physics and Geometry, World Scientific Publishing, Singapore.
Dürr, D., S. Goldstein, and N. Zanghi: 1992a, ‘Quantum Equilibrium and the Origin of Absolute Uncertainty’, Journal of Statistical Physics 67, 843-907.
Dürr, D., S. Goldstein, and N. Zanghi: 1992b, ‘Quantum Chaos, Classical Randomness, and Bohmian Mechanics’, Journal of Statistical Physics 68, 843-907.
Dürr, D., S. Goldstein, and N. Zanghi: 1993, ‘A Global Equilibrium as the Foundation of Quantum Randomness’, Foundations of Physics 23, 721-738.
Hesse, M. B.: 1966, Models and Analogies in Science, University of Notre Dame Press, Indiana.
Hesse, M. B.: 1974, The Structure of Scientific Inference, University of California Press, Berkeley and Los Angeles.
Maudlin, T.: 1994, Quantum Non-Locality and Relativity: Metaphysical Intimations of Modern Physics, Blackwell, Oxford UK and Cambridge USA.
Nelson, E.: 1966, ‘Derivation of the Schrodinger Equation from Newtonian Mechanics’, Physical Review 150, 1079-1085.
Nelson, E.: 1967, Dynamical Theories of Brownian Motion, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.
Pickering, A.: 1980, ‘Exemplars and Analogies: A Comment on Crane's Study of Kuhnian Paradigms in High Energy Physics' and 'Reply to Crane’, Social Studies of Science 10, 497-502, 507-508.
Pickering, A.: 1984, Constructing Quarks: A Sociological History of Particle Physics, Edinburgh University Press, Edinburgh.
Valentini, A.: 1991a, ‘Signal-Locality, Uncertainty, and the Subquantum H-Theorem. I’, Physics Letters A 156, 5-11.
Valentini, A.: 1991b, ‘Signal-Locality, Uncertainty, and the Subquantum H-Theorem, II’, Physics Letters A 158, 1-8.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Guarini, M. Bohm's Metaphors, Causality, and the Quantum Potential. Erkenntnis 59, 77–95 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1023941005266
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1023941005266