Abstract
My aim in this paper is to investigate the variants of directionality implied in visual hieratic texts as religious markers in the sacrosphere, which are substantially expressed in the form of a wayside shrine/cross. The methodological underpinnings for this project rely on the proposed semiotactics (cf. Haładewicz-Grzelak): the investigative perspective modeled after phonotactics – a branch of phonology investigating the restrictions on and the possibilities of phoneme combinations in languages (cf. Dziubalska-Kołaczyk 2011). The study draws on digital documentation of wayside shrines, crosses, and sacrality markers on houses collected by the author in various European countries (2009–2021), focusing in particular on the material collected in the area of present Slovakia, Ukraine, Austria, Slovenia, and the region of the Beskid Mountains in Poland. It shows how bodily hexis is inscribed into the phenomenology of a wayside shrine through particular types of hierophanic dynamics. The study also focuses on the aspect of headedness and markedness in the nano-structure of a sign, surfacing as directionality in the conceptualization of the religious sphere by particular communities.
References
Andrews, Edna. 1987. Jakobsonian markedness theory as a mathematic principle. In Krystyna Pomorska, Elzbieta Chodakowska, Hugh McLean & Brent Vine (eds.), Language, poetry, and poetics, 175–198. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110862812-013Search in Google Scholar
Andrews, Edna. 1990. Markedness theory: The union of asymmetry and semiotics in language. Durham: Duke University Press.10.2307/j.ctv120qs2wSearch in Google Scholar
Backley, Phillip & Toyomi Takahashi. 1998. Element activation. In Eugeniusz Cyran (ed.), Structure and interpretation: Studies in phonology, 13–40. Lublin: Folium.Search in Google Scholar
Bourdieu, Pierre. 1990 [1980]. The logic of practice, Richard Nice (trans.). Stanford: Stanford University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Bourdieu, Pierre. 1991 [1982]. Price formation and the anticipation of profits. In John B. Thompson (ed.), Language and symbolic power, Gina Raymond & Matthew Adamson (trans.), 66–89. Oxford: Polity Press.Search in Google Scholar
Bourdieu, Pierre. 2005 [1979]. Dystynkcja: Społeczna krytyka władzy sądzenia, Piotr Biłos (trans.). Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe Scholar.Search in Google Scholar
Cantor, Robert M. 2016. Conceptual embodiment in visual semiotics. Semiotica 210(1/4). 215–234.10.1515/sem-2016-0052Search in Google Scholar
Chrzanowska-Kluczewska, Elżbieta. 2017. Corporeal imagination in the reception of verbal and visual artworks. In Elżbieta Chrzanowska-Kluczewska & Olga Vorobyova (eds.), Language – literature – the arts: A cognitive-semiotic interface, 71–94. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.10.3726/b10692Search in Google Scholar
Danesi, Marcel. 1998. The dimensionality principle and semiotic analysis. Sign System Studies 26. 42–60.10.12697/SSS.1998.26.02Search in Google Scholar
Danesi, Marcel. 2004. Metáfora, pensamiento, y lenguaje. Madrid: Kronos.Search in Google Scholar
Danesi, Marcel. 2009. Opposition theory and the interconnectedness of language, culture, and cognition. Sign Systems Studies 37(1/2). 11–42.10.12697/SSS.2009.37.1-2.02Search in Google Scholar
Deely, John. 2016. Uninstantiability. Semiotica 208(1/4). 1–20.10.1515/sem-2015-0120Search in Google Scholar
Dressler, Wolfgang Urlich. 1999a. On a semiotic theory of preferences in language. In Michael Haley & Michael Shapiro (eds.), The Peirce seminar papers. Essays in semiotic analysis, vol. 4, 389–415. New York: Berghahn.Search in Google Scholar
Dressler, Wolfgang Urlich. 1999b. What is natural in Natural Morphology (NM)? Travaux du Cercle Linguistique de Prague 3. 135–144.10.1075/plcp.3.11dreSearch in Google Scholar
Durkheim, Émile. 2012. Elementarne formy życia religijnego: System totemiczny w Australii, Elżbieta Tarkowska (ed.), Anna Zadrożyńska (trans.). Warszawa: Państwowe Wydawnictwo Naukowe.Search in Google Scholar
Dziubalska-Kołaczyk, Katarzyna. 2001. Phototactic constraints and preferences. In Katarzyna Dziubalska-Kołaczyk (ed.), Constraints and preferences: Trends in linguistics (Studies and monographs 134), 69–100. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110881066Search in Google Scholar
Dziubalska-Kołaczyk, Katarzyna. 2002. Beats-and-binding phonology. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.Search in Google Scholar
Dziubalska-Kołaczyk, Katarzyna, Wolfgang U. Dressler & Daniel Śledziński. 2004. Morphonotactics. Paper presented at the 36th Poznań Linguistic Meeting, 22–24 April.Search in Google Scholar
Dziubalska-Kołaczyk, Katarzyna & Daria Zielińska. 2011. Universal phonotactic and morphonotactic preferences in second language acquisition. In Katarzyna Dziubalska-Kołaczyk, Magdalena Wrembel & Małgorzata Kul (eds.), Achievements and perspectives in SLA of speech: New sounds 2010, 53–64. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.Search in Google Scholar
Eliade, Mircea. 1965 [1957]. Le sacré et le profane. Paris: Éditions Gallimard.Search in Google Scholar
Eliade, Mircea. 1993 [1949]. Traktat o historii religii, Jan Wierusz-Kowalski (trans.). Łódź: Wydawnictwo Opus.Search in Google Scholar
Flemons, Douglas G. 1991. Completing distinctions. Boston: Shambhala.Search in Google Scholar
Haładewicz-Grzelak, Małgorzata. 2012. Dynamic modeling of visual texts: A relational model. Semiotica 190(1/4). 211–251.10.1515/sem-2012-0047Search in Google Scholar
Haładewicz-Grzelak, Małgorzata. 2014. The segmentation of phenomenological space in Licheń as an example of double binds. Semiotica 200(1/4). 275–312.10.1515/sem-2014-0003Search in Google Scholar
Haładewicz-Grzelak, Małgorzata. 2015. Semiotactics of contact in the case study of Moses Tablets in the sacrosphere of Judaism. Paper presented at the International Conference Languages in Contact, 28–29 May.10.1515/sem-2014-0082Search in Google Scholar
Haładewicz-Grzelak, Małgorzata. 2017. Centripetal and centrifugal forces in the sacrosphere of Judaism. Paper presented at the Thirteenth IASS-AIS World Congress of International Association for Semiotic Studies, 26–30 June 2017.Search in Google Scholar
Haładewicz-Grzelak, Małgorzata. 2018. Semiotaktyczne studium sakrosfery kultury na materiale wybranych przykładów wizualnej symboliki hierofanicznej [Semiotactic study of culture’s sacrosphere on the material of selected examples of visual hierophanic symbolics]. Opole: Oficyna Wydawnicza Politechniki Opolskiej.Search in Google Scholar
Haładewicz-Grzelak, Małgorzata. 2021. Semiotactic mapping of Stone Tablets and Magen David as hieratic markers of Judaism in the institutional sacrosphere. In Małgorzata Haładewicz-Grzelak & Marta Bogusławska-Tafelska (eds.), Intersubjective plateaus in language and communication, 226–246. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.10.3726/b19130Search in Google Scholar
Jakobson, Roman. 1971 [1941]. Child language, aphasia, and phonological universals, Allan R. Keiler (trans.). The Hague: Mouton.Search in Google Scholar
Kozhevnikov, Maria, Olga Louchakova, Zoran Josipovic, & Michael A. Motes. 2009. The enhancement of visuospatial processing efficiency through Buddhist deity meditation. Psychological Science 20(5). 645–653.10.1111/j.1467-9280.2009.02345.xSearch in Google Scholar
Kress, Gunther R. & Theo van Leeuwen. 1996. Reading images: The grammar of visual design. London: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar
Küffner, Hatto & Edmund Spohr. 1985. Wegenkreuze kappeln, heiligenäuschen (Denkmäler in Düsseldorf 1). Düsseldorf: Hornung KG.Search in Google Scholar
Létourneau, Alain. 1997. La religion de l’imaginaire à l’époque des communications. Studies in Religion/Sciences Religieuses 26(3). 309–335.10.1177/000842989702600303Search in Google Scholar
Lotman, Yuri. 2005 [1992]. On the semiosphere. Sign System Studies 33(1). 205–229.10.12697/SSS.2005.33.1.09Search in Google Scholar
Otto, Rudolf. 1923 [1917]. The idea of the holy [Das heilige]. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Piatigorski, Alexander M. 1974. Some general remarks on mythology from the psychologist’s view. Semiotica 10(3). 221–232.10.1515/semi.1974.10.3.221Search in Google Scholar
Pike, Kenneth. 1967 [1954]. Language in relation to a unified theory of the structure of human behaviour. Berlin: Mouton.10.1515/9783111657158Search in Google Scholar
Scheer, Tobias. 2007. How morphosyntax talks to phonology: One-channel translation and direct interface. Paper presented at Ealing École d’Autumne de Linguistique, August.Search in Google Scholar
Stankiewicz, Edward. 1982. Centripetal and centrifugal structures in poetry. Semiotica 38(3/4). 217–242.10.1515/semi.1982.38.3-4.217Search in Google Scholar
Tarkowska, Elżbieta. 2012. Wstep do wydania polskiego [An introduction to the Polish edition]. In Elżbieta Tarkowska (ed.), Émile Durkheim, Elementarne formy życia religijnego: System totemiczny w Australii, Anna Zadrożyńska (trans.), XIII–XL. Warszawa: Państwowe Wydawnictwo Naukowe.Search in Google Scholar
Trubeckoj, Nikolaj S. 1971. Principles of phonology, Christiane A. M. Baltaxe (trans.). Berkeley: University of California Press.Search in Google Scholar
Uspienski, Borys. 1974 [1969]. The influence of language on the religious consciousness. Semiotica 10(2). 177–189.10.1515/semi.1974.10.2.177Search in Google Scholar
Uspienski, Borys. 1975 [1973]. “Left” and “right” in Russian icon painting. Semiotica 13(1). 33–40.10.1515/semi.1975.13.1.33Search in Google Scholar
Walendowska, Barbara. 1987. Sacrum/profanum. In Zofia Stadszczak (ed.), Słownik etnologiczny: Terminy ogólne, 323–326. Warszawa: PWN.Search in Google Scholar
Wasilewski, Jerzy. 2010. Tabu. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Warszawskiego.10.31338/uw.9788323510420Search in Google Scholar
© 2021 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston
