Skip to main content
Log in

Review Socially Extended Epistemology

J. Adam Carter, Andy Clark, Jesper Kallestrup, S. Orestis Palermos, and Duncan Pritchard (eds.): Socially Extended Epistemology. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2018, 336pp, £55.00 HB

  • Review Essay
  • Published:
Metascience Aims and scope

A Correction to this article was published on 29 July 2019

This article has been updated

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Change history

  • 29 July 2019

    This review essay was published without the title and therefore has been corrected.

References

  • Bird, A. 2010. Social knowing: The social sense of ‘scientific knowledge’. Philosophical Perspectives 24(1): 23–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boyd, K. 2019. Epistemically pernicious groups and the groupstrapping problem. Social Epistemology 33: 1–13. 

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clark, A. 2008. Supersizing the Mind: Embodiment, Action, and Cognitive Extension. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Clark, A., and D.J. Chalmers. 1998. The extended mind. Analysis 58(1): 7–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elzinga, B. 2018. Self-regulation and knowledge-how. Episteme 15(1): 119–140. https://doi.org/10.1017/epi.2016.45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ford, A., J. Hornsby, and F. Stoutland. (eds.) 2011. Essays on Anscombe’s Intention. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldberg, S.C. 2012. Epistemic extendedness, testimony, and the epistemology of instrument-based belief. Philosophical Explorations 15(2): 181–197.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goldberg, S. C. (forthcoming). Epistemically engineered environments. Synthese 1–20.

  • Hardwig, J. 1985. Epistemic dependence. Journal of Philosophy 82(7): 335–349.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jenkins, A.C., D. Dodell-Feder, R. Saxe, and J. Knobe. 2014. The neural bases of directed and spontaneous mental state attributions to group agents. PLoS ONE 9: e105341.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lackey, J. 2016. What is justified group belief? Philosophical Review 125(3): 341–396.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lahiri, U. 2002. Questions and answers in embedded contexts. Oxford: OUP.

    Google Scholar 

  • Löwenstein, D. 2017. Know-how as Competence. A Rylean Responsibilist Account. Frankfurt am Main: Vittorio Klostermann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayo-Wilson, C., Kevin J.S. Zollman, and D. Danks. 2011. The independence Thesis: When individual and social epistemology diverge. Philosophy of Science 78(4): 653–677.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nickerson, R. 1998. Confirmation Bias: A ubiquitous phenomenon in many guises. Review of General Psychology 2(2): 175–220.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Palermos, S.O. 2015. Active externalism, virtue reliabilism and scientific knowledge. Synthese 192(9): 2955–2986.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pritchard, D. 2010. Cognitive ability and the extended cognition thesis. Synthese 175(1): 133–151.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Solomon, M. 1992. Scientific rationality and human reasoning. Philosophy of Science 59(3): 439–455.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thagard, P. 2010. Explaining economic crises: Are there collective representations? Episteme 7(3): 266–283.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tollefsen, D. 2006. From extended mind to collective mind. Cognitive Systems Research 7(2): 140–150.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zollman, K.J.S. 2010. The epistemic benefit of transient diversity. Erkenntnis 72(1): 17–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zollman, K.J.S. 2018. The credit economy and the economic rationality of science. Journal of Philosophy 115(1): 5–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Thanks to Orestis Palermos for comments on this review.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Joshua Habgood-Coote.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

This Review Essay was published without the title and therefore has been corrected.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Habgood-Coote, J. Review Socially Extended Epistemology. Metascience 28, 441–447 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11016-019-00409-x

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11016-019-00409-x

Navigation