Abstract
One of the major criticisms of optimal foraging theory (OFT) is that it is not testable. In discussions of this criticism opposing parties have confused methodological concepts and used meaningless biological concepts. In this paper we discuss such misunderstandings and show that OFr has an empirically testable, and even well-confirmed, general core theory. One of our main conclusions is that specific model testing should not be aimed at ‘proving’ optimality, but rather at identifying the context in which certain types of behaviour are optimal. To do this, it is necessary to be aware of the assumptions made in testing a model. The assumptions that are explicitly stated in the literature up to now do not completely cover the actual assumptions made in testing OFT models in practice. We present a more comprehensive set of assumptions. Although all the assumptions play a role in testing models, they are not of equal status. Crucial assumptions concern constraints and the relation between fitness and currency. Therefore, it is essential to make such assumptions testable in practice. We show that a more explicit relationship between OFT modelling and evolutionary theory can help with this. Specifically, phylogeny reconstruction and population dynamic modelling can and should be used to formulate assumptions concerning constraints and currencies.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Beatty, J. (1980). Optimal-design models and the strategy of model building in evolutionary biology. Philos. Sci. 47: 532–561.
Caswell, H. (1989). Matrix Population Models. Sunderland, Mass., Sinauer Associates Inc.
Emlen, J.M. (1966). The role of time and energy in food preference. Am. Nat. 100: 611–617.
Gray, R.D. (1987). Faith and foraging: a critique of the ‘paradigm argument from design’. In: A.C. Kamil, J.R. Krebs, and H.R. Pulliam, eds, Foraging Behaviour. New York, Plenum Press.
Kacelnik, A. and I.C. Cuthill (1987). Starlings and optimal foraging theory: modelling in a fractal world. In: A.C. Kamil, J.R. Krebs, and H.R. Pulliam, eds, Foraging Behaviour. New York, Plenum Press.
Maynard Smith, J. (1978). Optimization theory in evolution. Ann. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 9: 31–56.
Mangel, M. and C.W. Clark (1988). Dynamic Modelling in Behavioral Ecology. Princeton, New Jersey, Princeton University Press.
McArthur, R.H. and E.R. Pianka (1966). On optimal use of a patchy environment. Am. Nat. 100: 603–609.
Metz, J.A.J., R.M. Nisbet and S.A.H. Geritz (1992). How should we define ‘fitness’ for general ecological scenarios? TREE: 198–202.
Mitchell, W.A. and T.J. Valone (1990). The optimization research program: studying adaptations by their function. Quart. Rev. Biol. 65: 43–52.
Pierce, G.J. and J.G. Ollason, J.G. (1987). Eight reasons why optimal foraging theory is a complete waste of time. Oikos 49: 111–118.
Popper, K.R. (1959). The Logic of Scientific Discovery. London, Hutchinson.
Popper, K.R. (1963). Conjectures and Refutations, the Growth of Scientific Knowledge. New York, Harper & Row.
Pyke, G.H. (1984). Optimal foraging theory: a critical review. Annual review of ecology and systematics 15: 523–575.
Schoener, T.W. (1987). A brief history of optimal foraging theory. In: A.C. Kamil, J.R. Krebs, and H.R. Pulliam, eds, Foraging Behaviour. New York, Plenum Press.
Sloep, P.B. and W.J. van der Steen (1987). The nature of evolutionary theory: the semantic challenge. Biol. and Philos. 2: 1–15.
Stearns, S.C. and P. Schmid-Hempel (1987). Evolutionary insights should not be wasted. Oikos. 49: 118–125.
Stephens, D.W. and J.R. Krebs (1986). Foraging Theory. Princeton, New Jersey, Princeton University Press.
Thompson, P. (1989). The Structure of Biological Theories. Albany, SUNY Press.
Tuljapurkar, S. (1990). Population Dynamics in Variable Environments. New York, Springer.
Van der Steer, W.J. (1982). Algemene Methodologie voor Biologen. Utrecht, Bohn, Scheltema and Holkema.
Van der Steer, W.J. (1990). Concepts in biology: a survey of practical methodological principles. J. Theor. Biol. 143: 383–403.
Van der Steer, W.J. and H. Kamminga (1991). Laws and natural history in biology. Br. J. Philos. Sci. 42: 445–467.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Haccou, P., van der Steen, W.J. Methodological problems in evolutionary biology. Acta Biotheor 40, 285–295 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00046328
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00046328