Skip to main content
Log in

Two metaphors of the niche

  • Published:
Synthese Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

In summary, many extant definitions of the niche concept are based on the geometric metaphor which represents the niche as an object embedded in a geometric space. There are several difficulties with this approach; the activities of organisms are not fully described, certain attributes of the functional aspect of the niche are not represented, the life cycles of organisms are not described, and the heuristic value of the concept diminishes with increasing dimensionality.

An alternative and complementary approach to the niche is the linguistic metaphor. This approach is based on the explanatory objective to explain the assembly of the ecosystems of successional seres from species pools and abiotic environmental factors. The linguistic metaphor suggests that a theory of ecosystem assembly is a generative grammar that associates particular species with environmental features. The niche of a particular species is defined in terms of the rules of a generative-transformational grammar used to derive an hierarchically organized description of that species. This approach also has conceptual difficulties: (1) empirically testing competence theories and distinguishing possible and impossible objects (e.g. species and ecosystems) are difficult, (2) evolutionary processes are difficult to incorporate, (3) the mathematical tools associated with grammars do not have the range of applicability of the mathematical tools associated with the geometric metaphor, and (4) the productions (hierarchical trees) of a grammar are not easily visualized.

The geometric and linguistic metaphors of the niche should be viewed as complementary pictures of the same object. The geometric representation is most adept at describing community dynamics and stability, niche overlap, and organism response to abiotic environments. The linguistic metaphor represents well organism activities, niche dynamics, and ecosystem assembly.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Andrewartha, H. G. and L. C. Birch: 1954, The Distribution and Abundance of Animals, Univ. Chicago Press, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Billings, W. D. 1952: ‘The environmental complex in relation to plant growth and distribution’, Quart. Rev. Biol. 27, 251–265.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bock, W. J. and G. von Wahlert: 1965, ‘Adaptation and the form-function complex’, Evolution 19, 269–299.

    Google Scholar 

  • Botkin, D. B.: 1977, ‘A functional approach to the niche concept in forest communities’, in G. S. Innis (ed.), New Directions in the Analysis of Ecological Systems. Part 2, pp. 149–158. Soc. Comput. Simul., La Jolla, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, J. H. and D. W. Davidson: 1977, ‘Competition between seed eating rodents and ants in desert ecosystems’, Science 196, 880–882.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chomsky, N.: 1957, Syntactic Structures, Mouton, The Hague.

    Google Scholar 

  • Christiansen, F. B. and T. M. Fenchel: 1977, Theories of Populations in Biological Communities, Springer-Verlag, Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clausen, J. D., D. Keck, and W. M. Hiesey: 1948, ‘Experimental studies on the nature of species. III. Environmental responses of climatic races of Achillea’. Carnegie Inst., Washington Pub. No. 242.

  • Cody, M. L.: 1974, Competition and the Structure of Bird Communities, Princeton Univ. Press, Princeton, N.J.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collier, B. D., G. W. Cox, A. W. Johnson, and P. C. Miller: 1973, Dynamic Ecology, Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, N.J.

    Google Scholar 

  • Colwell, R. K. and E. R. Fuentes: 1975, ‘Experimental studies of the niche’, Ann. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 6, 281–310.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dawkins, R.: 1976, ‘Hierarchical organization: A candidate principle for ethology’, in P. P. G. Bateson and R. A. Hinde (eds.), Growing Points in Ethology, Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dretske, F. I.: 1974, ‘Explanation in linguistics’, in D. Cohen (ed.) Explaining Linguistic Phenomena, John Wiley & Sons, N.Y. pp. 21–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elton, C. S.: 1927, Animal Ecology, Macmillan, NY.

    Google Scholar 

  • Emlen, J.: 1973, Ecology: An Evolutionary Approach, Addison-Wesley Pub. Co., Reading, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grinder, J. T. and S. H. Elgin: 1973, Guide to Transformational Grammar: History, Theory, Practice, Holt, Rinehard, and Winston, Inc., N.Y.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grinnell, J.: 1928, ‘Presence and absence of animals’, Univ. California Chronicle 30, 429–450.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gross, M.: 1972, Mathematical Models in Linguistics, Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, N.J.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haefner, J. W.: 1977, ‘Generative grammars that simulate ecological systems’, in G. S. Innis (ed.), New Directions in the Analysis of Ecological Systems Part 2, pp. 189–211, Soc. Comput. Simul., La Jalla, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haefner, J. W.: 1979, ‘Generative grammars and general systems’, in F. Pichler (ed.), Progress in Cybernetics and Systems Research, Vol. 5. Hemisphere Pub. Corp., NY. (in press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hespenheide, H. A.: 1975, ‘Prey characteristics and predator niche width’, in M. L. Cody and J. M. Diamond (eds.), Ecology and Evolution of Communities, pp. 158–180, Belknap Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hull, D. L.: 1974, Philosophy of Biological Science, Prentice-Hall Inc., Englewood Cliffs, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hutchinson, G. E.: 1957, ‘Concluding remarks’, Cold Spr. Harb. Symp. Quant. Biol. 22, 415–427.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hutchinson, G. E.: 1978, An Introduction to Population Ecology, Yale Univ. Press, New Haven.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kauffman, S.A.: 1976, ‘Articulation of parts explanation in biology and the rational search for them’, in M. Grene and E. Mendelsohn (eds.) Topics in the Philosophy of Biology, pp. 245–263 (Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science, Vol. 27), D. Reidel Pub. Co., Dordrecht, Holland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krebs, C. J.: 1972, Ecology: The Experimental Analysis of Distribution and Abundance, Harper & Row, NY.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kroes, H. W.: 1977, ‘The niche structure of ecosystems’, J. Theoret. Biol. 65, 317–326.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kulesza, G.: 1975, ‘Comment on “Niche, habitat, and ecotope”’, Amer. Nat. 109, 476–479.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacArthur, R. H.: 1968, ‘The theory of the niche’, in R. C. Lewontin (ed.), Population Biology and Evolution, pp. 159–176, Syracuse Univ. Press, Syracuse, NY.

    Google Scholar 

  • Macfadyen, A.: 1963, Animal Ecology: Aims and Methods, Sir Isaac Pitman and Sons, Ltd., London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maelzer, D. A.: 1965a, ‘A discussion of components of environment in ecology’, J. Theoret. Biol. 8, 141–162.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maelzer, D. A.: 1965b, ‘Environment, semantics and system theory in ecology’, J. Theoret. Biol. 8, 395–402.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maguire, B.: 1973, ‘Niche response structure and the analytical potentials of its relationship to the habitat’, Amer. Nat. 107, 213–246.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mason, H. L. and J. H. Langenheim: 1957, ‘Language analysis and the concept “environment”’, Ecology 38, 325–340.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nagel, E.: 1961, The Structure of Science: Problems in the Logic of Scientific Explanation, Harcourt, Brace, and World, Inc. NY.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nagel, E.: 1977, ‘Teleology revisited’, The Journal of Philosophy 74, 261–301.

    Google Scholar 

  • Odum, E. P.: 1971, Fundamentals of Ecology, W. B. Saunders, Philadelphia, PA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pianka, E. R.: 1973, ‘The structure of lizard communities’, Ann. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 4, 53–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pianka, E. R.: 1974, Evolutionary Ecology, Harper and Row, NY.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pielou, E. C.: 1974, Population and Community Ecology: Principles and Methods, Gordon and Breach, NY.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pielou, E. C.: 1975, Ecological Diversity, John Wiley, NY.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rejmanek, M. and J. Jenik: 1975, ‘Niche, habitat, and related ecological concepts’, Acta Biotheoret. 24, 100–107.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ricklefs, R. W.: 1973, Ecology, Chiron Press, Newton, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roughgarden, J.: 1972, ‘Evolution of niche width’, Amer. Nat. 106, 683–718.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruse, M.: 1973, The Philosophy of Biology, Hutchinson University Library, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schank, R. C.: 1973, ‘Identification of conceptualizations underlying natural language’, in R. C. Schank and K. M. Colby (eds.), Computer Models of Thought and Language, pp. 187–247, W. H. Freeman and Co., San Francisco

    Google Scholar 

  • Schank, R. C. and K. M. Colby (eds.): 1973, Computer Models of Thought and Language, W. H. Freeman and Co., San Francisco.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schank, R. C. and Y. Wilks: 1974, ‘The goals of linguistic theory revisited’, Lingua 34, 301–326.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schoener, T. W.: 1974, ‘Competition and the form of habitat shift’, Theor. Pop. Biol. 6, 265–307.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, K. T.: 1971, Primer of Modern Analysis, Bogden and Quigley, Tarrytown-on-Hudson, NY.

    Google Scholar 

  • Southwood, T. R. E.: 1977, ‘Habitat, the templet for ecological strategies?’, J. Anim. Ecol. 46, 337–365.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tinbergen, N.: 1951, The Study of Instinct, Oxford Univ. Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turesson, G.: 1930, ‘The selective effect of climate upon the plant species’, Hereditas 14, 99–152.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vandermeer, J. H.: 1972, ‘Niche theory’, Ann. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 3, 107–132.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whittaker, R. H., S. A. Levin, and R. B. Root: 1973, ‘Niche, habitat, and ecotope’ Amer. Nat. 107, 321–338.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whittaker, R. H., S. A. Levin, and R. B. Root: 1975, ‘On the reasons for distinguishing “Niche, habitat, and ecotope”’, Amer. Nat. 109, 479–482.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whittaker, R. H. and G. M. Woodwell: 1972, ‘Evolution of natural communities’, in J. A. Wiens (ed.), Ecosystem Structure and Function, pp. 137–156, Oregon State Univ. Press, Corvallis, OR.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, E. E.: 1972, ‘The origin of faunas. Evolution of lizard congeners in a complex island fauna. A trial analysis’, in T. Dobzhansky, M. K. Hecht, and W. C. Steere (eds.), Evolutionary Biology, Vol. 6, pp. 47–89, Appleton, Century, Crofts, NY.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wimsatt, W. C.: 1972, ‘Teleology and the logical structure of function statements’, Stud. Hist. Phil. Sci. 3, 1–80.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winograd, T.: 1973, ‘A procedural model of language understanding’, in R. C. Schank and K. M. Colby (eds), Computer Models of Thought and Language, pp. 152–186, W. H. Freeman and Co., San Francisco.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wuenscher, J. E.: 1969, ‘Niche specification and competition modeling’, J. Theoret. Biol. 25, 436–443.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yoshiyama, R. M. and J. Roughgarden: 1977, ‘Species packing in two dimensions’, Amer. Nat. 111, 107–121.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Haefner, J.W. Two metaphors of the niche. Synthese 43, 123–153 (1980). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00413860

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00413860

Keywords

Navigation