Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Artifice and virtue in theXunzi

  • Articles
  • Published:
Dao Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Xunzi was chronologically the third of the three great Confucian thinkers of China’s classical period, after Confucius and Mencius. Having produced the most comprehensive philosophical system of that period, he occupies a place in the development of Chinese philosophy comparable to that of Aristotle in the Western philosophical tradition. This essay reveals how Xunzi’s understanding of virtue and moral development dovetailed with his positions on ritual propriety, the attunement of names, the relation betweenli (patterns) andlei (categories), and his view ofdao (the way) in general. I have argued for a “constructivist” understanding of each of these aspects of Xunzi’s philosophy in some detail elsewhere (see Hagen 2000, 2001, 2002, 2003), and so here I will just briefly review a few key points before addressing their relation to moral development.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abe, Yoshio 1964.Chinese Philosophy (Chūgoku no Tetsugaku). Tokyo: University of Tokyo Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ames, Roger T. and Hall, David L. 2001.Focusing the Familiar: A Translation and Philosophical Interpretation of the Zhongyong. Honolulu: University of Hawai’i Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ames, Roger and Rosemont, Henry Jr. 1998.The Analects of Confucius: A Philosophical Translation. New York: Ballantine Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, Daqi 1954.Xunzi’s Theory (Xunzi Xueshuo). Taipei:Zhonghua Wenhua Chuban Weiyuanhua.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cua, Antonio S. 1985.Ethical Argumentation: A Study in Hsün Tzu’s Moral Epistemology. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1993.Moral Vision and Tradition: Essays in Chinese Ethics. Washington, D. C.: The Catholic University of America Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dubs, Homer. 1966.The Works ofHsüntze. Taipei: Ch’eng-Wen Publishing Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feng, Youlan (FUNG Yu-lan) 1961.A History of Chinese Philosophy. Hong Kong: Taipingyang Tushu Gongsi.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fung, Yu-lan (FENG Youlan). 1952.A History of Chinese Philosophy, vol. 1. Trans. by Derk Bodde. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fu, Yunlong, trans. 1996.The Great Learning-The Doctrine of the Mean. Beijing:HuayuJiaoyuChubanshe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gier, Nicholas F. 2001. “The Dancing Ru: A Confucian Aesthetics of Virtue.”Philosophy East and West 51. 2: 280–305.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Graham, A. C. 1989.Disputers of the Tao: Philosophical Argument in Ancient China. La Salle: Open Court.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dictionary of Commonly Used Classical Chinese Characters (Guhanyu changyonzi zidian). Beijing: Shangwu, 2000.

  • Hagen, Kurds. 200. “A Critical Review of Ivanhoe on Xunzi.”The Journal of Chinese Philosophy 27.3: 361–373.

  • —. 2001. “The Concepts ofLi andLei in theXunzi: Constructive Patterning of Categories.”International Philosophical Quarterly 42.2: 183–197.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 2002. “Zhengming in theXunzi: Naming as a Constructive Project.”Asian Philosophy 12.1: 35–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • —. 2003. “Xunzi and the Nature of Confucian Ritual.”Journal of the American Academy of Religion 71.2: 371–403.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hutton, Eric L. 2001. “Xunzi.” InReadings in Classical Chinese Philosophy.

  • Philip J. Ivanhoe and Bryan W. Van Norden (eds.). New York: Seven Bridges Press. 247–293.

  • Itano, Chōhachi 1995.A Study of the Historical Formation of Confucianism (Jukyō Seiritsushi No Kenkyū). Tokyo: Iwanami Shoten.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaizuka, Shigeki 1961.The Various Masters of the 100 Schools: Thinkers of Ancient China (Shoshi hyakka: Chūgoku kodai shisōkatachi). Tokyo: Iwanami Shoten.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kakimura, Takashi and Azuma Jūji 1995. (History of Chinese Philosophy) (Chūgoku Tetsugakushi). Tokyo: Fuzanbo.

    Google Scholar 

  • Karlgren, Bernhard. 1957.Grammata Serica Recensa. Bulletin of the Museum of Far Eastern Antiquities 29: 1–332.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kline III, T. C. 2000. “Moral Agency and Motivation in theXunzi.” InVir tue, Nature, and Moral Agency in the Xunzi, edited by T. C. Kline III and Philip J. Ivanhoe. Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knoblock, John. 1988,1990, 1994.Xunzi: A Translation and Study of the Com plete Works. 3 volumes. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kodama, Rokurō 1992.Xunzi’s Thought Junshi no shisō. Tokyo.

  • —. 1973. “An Interpretation of Xunzi’s ‘Human Nature Is Crude, Its Goodness is Artifice’” (“Junshi no ‘ren zhi xing e, qi shan zhe wei ye’ no kaisyaku”).Kagoshima kōgyöō kōtō senmon gakkō kenkyū hōkoku 8:79–89.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lau, D. C. 2000. “Theories of Human Nature in Mencius and Xunzi.” InVirtue, Nature, and Moral Agency in the Xunzi, edited by T. C. Kline III and Philip J. Ivanhoe. Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Munro, Donald J. 1969.The Concept of Man in Early China. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murase, Hiroya 1986.The WorldofXunzi (Junshi no sekai). Tokyo: Nichu Shuppan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morohashi, Tetsuji 1957.Great Chinese—Japanese Dictionary (Dai KanWajiten). Tokyo: Taishukan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nagao, Ryūichi 1999.Ancient Chinese Thought Notebook (Kodai Chūgoku shisō nōto). Tokyo: Shinzansha Shuppan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nishi, Junzō 1969.Collected Essays on Chinese Thought (Chūgoku shisō ronshū). Tokyo: Chikuma.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nivison, David. 1996.The Ways of Confucianism: Investigations in Chinese Philosophy, edited by Bryan W. Van Norden. Chicago: Open Court.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ōmuro, Mikio 1967. “Historical Sense of Xunzi” (“Junshi no rekishi ishiki”).The Tokyo Shinagakuhō: bulletin of the Tokyo Sinological Society 13. 113–134.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosemont, Henry, Jr. 2000. “State and Society in theXunzi.” InVirtue, Nature, and Moral Agency in the Xunzi, edited by T. C. Kline III and Philip J. Ivanhoe. Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sato, Masayuki. 2000. “The Development of Pre-Qin Conceptual Terms and their Incorporation into Xunzi’s Thought.” InLinked Faiths: Essays on Chinese Religions and Traditional Culture in Honour of Kristofer Schipper, edited by Jan A. M. De Meyer and Peter M. Engelfriet. Boston: Brill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schofer, Jonathan. 2000. “Virtues in Xunzi’s Thought.” InVirtue, Nature, and Moral Agency in the Xunzi, edited by T. C. Kline III and Philip J. Ivanhoe. Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz, Benjamin I. 1985.The World of Thought in Ancient China. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang, Xianqian 1988.Collected commentaries on the Xunzi (Xunzi Jijie). 2 volumes. Beijing: Zhonghua Shuju

    Google Scholar 

  • Watson, Burton. 1963.Hsüntzu: Basic Writings. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Xunzi. 1966.A Concordance to Hsün Tzu. Harvard-Yenching Institute Sinological Index Series, supplement No. 22, reprint. Taipei: Chinese Materials and Research Aids Service Center.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yearley, Lee. 1980. “Hsün Tzu on the Mind: His Attempted Synthesis of Confucianism and Taoism,”Journal of Asian Studies 39: 465–480.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. College of Humanities and Sciences, Nihon University, 3-25-40 Sakurajyosui, Satagaya-ku, 156-8550, Tokyo, Japan

    Kurtis Hagen (Japan Society for the Promotion of Science Research Fellow)

Authors
  1. Kurtis Hagen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hagen, K. Artifice and virtue in theXunzi . Dao 3, 85–107 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02910342

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02910342

Keywords

Search

Navigation