Abstract
Multiple definitions of Modernism have been put forward, often focusing on the character or features of the works of art and literature produced within this cultural movement. Here I want to focus, instead, on the sensibility of Modernism as this has manifested itself to be especially concerned not with the content of representation, but with the materials out of which a representation is made. Through an analysis of eighteenth-century English portraiture, nineteenth-century French political painting, and up to twentieth-century Modernist painting, I will show how one ceases to see the representational content through the materials and technique, and how we begin to see it depicted in them. I will furthermore examine some cases showing the progression into Modernism in those arts, and then consider the parallel movement in philosophy. Each, as we will see, casts important light on the other, and in the end, something essential to the Modernist achievement will emerge in high relief: just as paint and visible, attention-capturing brushstroke is constitutive of the content of modernist painting, and just as steel and glass and the purity of visible, exposed design is constitutive of architecture, so language is constitutive of us and a distinctively modern form of self-understanding. In this context we will see more of the significance of Wittgenstein’s claim that language itself is the vehicle of thought.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Adams, M.H. 1971. The Mirror and the Lamp. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Cavell, S. 1976. The Availability of Wittgenstein’s Later Philosophy. In Must We Mean What We Say? Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
———. 1989. This New Yet Unapproachable America. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Hagberg, G. 2015. Implication in Interpretation: Wittgenstein, Artistic Content, and ‘The Field of a Word’. In Mind, Language, and Action: Proceedings of the 36th International Wittgenstein Symposium, ed. Daniel Moyal-Sharrock, Volker Munz, and Annalisa Coliva. Berlin: De Gruyter.
Kern, S. 2003. The Culture of Time and Space: 1880–1918. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Lemahieu, M. 2017. Below’s Private Language. In Wittgenstein and Modernism, ed. Michael Lemahieu and Karen Zumhagen-Yekple. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Levenson, M. 2011. Modernism. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Motherwell, R. 2007. The Writings of Robert Motherwell. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Neighbor, O., P. Griffiths, and George Perle. 1983. The New Grove Second Viennese School. New York: Norton.
Rhees, R. 1970. Can There Be a Private Language? In Discussions of Wittgenstein. London: Routledge and Kegan Pau.
Wittgenstein, L. 2009. Philosophical Investigations, trans. G.E.M. Anscombe and ed. P.M.S. Hacker and Joachim Schulte, revised 4th ed. Malden: Wiley-Blackwell.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Hagberg, G.L. (2018). The Medium Itself: Modernism in Art and Philosophy’s Linguistic Self-Analysis. In: Falcato, A., Cardiello, A. (eds) Philosophy in the Condition of Modernism . Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-77078-9_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-77078-9_5
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-77077-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-77078-9
eBook Packages: Religion and PhilosophyPhilosophy and Religion (R0)