Abstract
The trade in human body parts can be understood as a solution to key challenges for both buyers and suppliers, as well as being a manifestation of individual property rights over one’s own body. However, it can be argued that there are serious ethical issues involved in commercializing the body in this way, despite which there has recently been a large increase in the international trade in human body parts. The most extensive transactions have concerned the trade in kidneys and the services of the fertility industry. An important driver of this is the fact that the medical profession is increasingly able to facilitate exchanges of human body parts relatively smoothly. The chapter focuses on commercial surrogacy as an example of the ethical aspects of the trade in human body parts and addresses the potential interplay between markets and ethical issues.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Archard, D. 2002. Selling yourself: Titmuss’s argument against a market in blood. Journal of Ethics 6: 87–103.
Arrow, K.J. 1972. Gifts and exchanges. Philosophy & Public Affairs 1 (4): 343–362.
Blazier, J., and R. Janssens. 2020. Regulating the international surrogacy markets: The ethics of commercial surrogacy in the Netherlands and India. Medicine Health Care and Philosophy 23: 621–630.
Centre for Social Research, CSR. 2010. Surrogate motherhood – Ethical or commercial. Vasant Kunj: Centre for Social Research.
Faden, R.R., and T.L. Beauchap. 1986. A history and theory of informed consent. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Hausman, D.M., and M.S. McPherson. 1993. Taking ethics seriously: Economics and contemporary moral philosophy. Journal of Economic Literature XXXI (June 93): 671–731.
Kant, I. 1998. Kant: Groundwork of the metaphysics of morals. Edited by Mary J. Gregor. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press (first published 1785).
Sen, A. 2002. Rationality and freedom. Cambridge: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
Shetty, P. 2012. India’s unregulated surrogacy industry. The Lancet 380 (9854): 1633–1634.
Singer, P. 1973. Althruism and commerce: A defence of Titmuss against Arrow. Philosophy and Public Affairs 2 (3): 312–320.
Smith, A. 1759. Theory of moral sentiments (2 ed.). A Millar, A Kincaid & J Bell, Strand & Edinburgh, retrieved 26 May 2014 from google books.
———. 1981. An inquiry into the nature and wealth of nations. Edited by R. H. Campbell and R. S. Skinner. I–II Vols. Indianapolis: Liberty Press.
Solow, R.M. 1971. Blood and thunder: Review of the gift relationship: From human blood to social policy by Richard M. Titmuss. The Yale Law Journal 80 (8): 1696–1711.
Timms, O. 2018. Ending commercial surrogacy in India: Significance of the surrogacy (regulation) bill, 2016. Indian Journal of Medical Ethics 3 (2): 99–102.
Titmuss, R.M. 1971a. Why give to strangers. The Lancet 297 (7690): 123–125.
———. 1971b. The gift relationship: From human blood to social policy. New York: Random House.
Wikipedia. 2021. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Surrogacy_laws_by_country
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Halsnæs, K., Ploug, T. (2023). Markets for Human Body Parts: The Case of Commercial Surrogacy. In: Kærgård, N. (eds) Market, Ethics and Religion. Ethical Economy, vol 62. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-08462-1_15
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-08462-1_15
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-08461-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-08462-1
eBook Packages: Religion and PhilosophyPhilosophy and Religion (R0)