Skip to main content
Log in

The role of commitment in scientific inquiry: Polanyi or popper?

  • Published:
Human Studies Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  • Adams, E. M. The Theoretical and the Practical.The Review of Metaphysics 1960,12 642–662.

    Google Scholar 

  • Polanyi, M.Personal Knowledge: Towards a Post Critical Philosophy. New York: Harper and Row, 1964.

    Google Scholar 

  • Polanyi, M.The Tacit Dimension. Garden City, New York: Doubleday, Anchor Books, 1966.

    Google Scholar 

  • Popper, K. R.The Logic of Scientific Discovery, London: Hutchinson Publishers, 1959.

    Google Scholar 

  • Popper, K.Conjectures and Refutations. New York: Basic Books, 1962.

    Google Scholar 

  • Popper, K.Objective Knowledge: An Evolutionary Approach. Oxford: The Clarendon Press, 1972.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hall, R.L. The role of commitment in scientific inquiry: Polanyi or popper?. Hum Stud 5, 45–60 (1982). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02127666

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02127666

Keywords

Navigation