Abstract
Corruption within the private sector has often not been dealt with in Brazil. Organizations may find corrupt acts in its operations or practices, but specific concepts and programs to avoid them are neither concrete nor clear. Some Brazilian stockholders have become aware of the risks involved in unethical procedures and are adopting the Best Practices of Corporate Governance initiative. International agencies have intensively supported organizations and governments in an effort to define policies that inhibit illegal or corrupt cultural habits throughout the world, but Brazilian practitioners show insufficient response. Skepticism may indicate a lack of understanding about how an ethical leadership can guide employees, setting high standards for the organizational culture and climate, clearly defining limits of correct behavior, and creating appropriate codes of ethics. Transparency still has to be discovered as a significant tool to encourage professionalism in performance and reporting of data in Brazilian companies. In this article, we analyze the ethical behavior of the purchasing department of a multinational company in its host country, Brazil. It focuses specifically on the supplier–buyer relationship. The results indicate that despite the negative reputation Brazilians have in business ethics, a company can still develop a positive and ethical relationship with its stakeholders. Communication, transparency, compliance with the company’s code of conduct as well as the supplier’s awareness of the buyer’s code of conduct are the factors which influence the supplier–buyer relationship. Transparency can be used as a tool to reduce corruption, thereby increasing ethical behavior and company image. Good ethical behavior can help to build up a company’s image.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Argandoña, A.: 2003, ‹Private-to-Private Corruption’, Journal of Business Ethics 47(3), 253–69.
Argandoña, A.: 2005, ‹Private Corruption and Companies: The Use of Facilitating Payments’, Journal of Business Ethics 60, 251–64.
Arrowsmith, S.: 2003, ‹Transparency in Government Procurement’, Journal of World Trade 37(2), 283–99.
Arruda, M. C. C.: 2002, Codigo de Etica, Um Instrumento que Adiciona Valor. (Negocio Editora, Sao Paulo, Brazil).
Arruda, M. C. C.: 2009, ‹A Etica Como Substrato da Transparencia’, in O. L. G. Quelhas, Cid Alledi Fº, E. R. Gomes and M. J. Meiriño (Orgs.), Transparencia nos Negócios e nas Organizações (Editora Atlas, Sao Paulo, Brazil).
Arruda, M. C. C.; Navran, F.: 2000, ‹Indicadores de Clima Etico nas Empresas’, RAE - Revista de Administracao de Empresas 40(3), 26-35.
Atkin, N.: 1999, ‹Communication and Politics: Transparency, Dialogue and Ethical Decision-Making’, Vital Speeches of the Day 65(11), 347-51.
Bedicks, H.C.; Arruda, M.C.: 2005, ‹Business Ethics and Corporate Governance in Latin America’, Business & Society 44(2), 218-28.
Bendixen, M. and Abratt, R.: 2007, ‹Corporate Identity, Ethics and Reputation in Supplier–Buyer Relationships’, Journal of Business Ethics, 76, 69–82.
Beschorner, T.: 2006, ‹Ethical Theory and Business Practices: The Case of Discourse Ethics’, Journal of Business Ethics, 66(2), 127–139.
Bessire, D.: 2005, ‹Transparency: A Two-Way Mirror?’, International Journal of Social Economics 32(5), 424-39.
BPCP (Business Principles For Countering Bribery): 2009, ‹Principles for Countering’, http://www.transparency.org/global_priorities/private_sector/business_principles. Accessed 15 May 2009
Cunha, J. P.: 2004, ‹Heranca Politica – Escandalos Marcantes do Governo FHC’, Fala, Brasil! (Dec. 7) http://www.brazil-brasil.com/content/view/256/78/. Accessed 15 May 2009.
Di Lorenzo, V.: 2007, ‹Business Ethics: Law As A Determinant of Business Conduct’, Journal of Business Ethics. 71, 275–99.
ECGI (European Corporate Governance Institute): 2003, ‹Relatorio Oficial sobre Governanca Corporativa na America Latina’ (Portuguese version of: Latin American Corporate Governance White Paper 2003). http://www.oecd.org/dataoecd/49/50/24277169.pdf. Accessed 15 May 2009.
Folha Online: 2007, ‹Governo mantem contratos com empresas envolvidas em escandalos’ (June 24, 9:21 a.m.), http://www1.folha.uol.com.br/folha/brasil/ult96u306769.shtml. Accessed 15 May 2009.
Guia Exame – Voce S/A: 2006, ‹Conheca as 150 Melhores Empresas no Brasil Para Voce Trabalhar’, 10th edition of Best Place to Work – Brazil, http://portalexame.abril.com.br/servicos/melhoresempresasparatrabalhar/m0099800.html. Accessed 29 June 2007 and 15 May 2009.
Halter, M. V. R. S.: 2008, Estudo da Percepção do Fornecedor com Relação à Ética dos Profissionais do setor de Compras de Grandes Empresas. Dissertation for the MSc degree in Business Administration. Fundacao Getulio Vargas, Escola de Administração de Empresas de Sao Paulo, Brazil, Dec. 11.
Houaiss, A.; Villar, M.S.: 2001, ‹ Dicionario Houaiss da Lingua Portuguesa’, 1st edition (Editora Objetiva, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil).
IBGC (Instituto Brasileiro de Governanca Corporativa): 2009, http://www.ibgc.org.br. Accessed 15 May 2009. Best Practices of Corporate Governance: 2009. Sao Paulo, Brazil: IBGC, 4th Edition. http://www.ibgc.org.br/CodigoMelhoresPraticas.aspx. Accessed 08 Sept 2009.
Kayes, D.C.: 2006, ‹Organizational Corruption as Theodicy’, Journal of Business Ethics 67, 51–62.
Klitgaard, R.: 1998, ‹International Cooperation Against Corruption, Finance & Development. 35(1), 3-6.
Levine, D.P.: 2005. ‹The Corrupt Organization’, Human Relations 58(6), 723-39.
Michael, B.: 2004, ‹Explaining Organizational Change in International Development’. Journal of International Development 16(8), 1067– 88.
Nussbaum, D.: 2004, ‹Why Businesses Must Face Up to Corruption?’ http://www.transparency.org/content/download/2042/12334/file/DN_Camag_2004_12_23.doc. Accessed 16 May 2009
Pater, A., & van Lierop, K. (2006). Sense and Sensitivity: the Roles of Organization and Stakeholders in Managing Corporate Social Responsibility. Business Ethics: A European Review, 15, 339–351.
Silva, M. F. G.: 1999, ‹The Political Economy of Corruption in Brazil’, RAE - Revista de Administracao de Empresas 39(3).
Stevens, B. (2008). Corporate Ethical Codes: Effective Instruments For Influencing Behavior. Journal of Business Ethics, 78,601–609.
Swift, T.(2001). Trust, Reputation and Corporate Accountability to Stakeholders. Business Ethics: A European Review, 10(1), 16-26.
The Transparency International Bribe Payers Index: 2009, http://www.transparency.org/policy_research/surveys_indices/bpi/bpi_1999; http://www.transparency.org/policy_research/surveys_indices/bpi/bpi_2002_1#what; http://www.transparency.org/policy_research/surveys_indices/bpi/bpi_2006; http://www.transparency.org/news_room/latest_news/press_releases/2008/bpi_2008_en. Accessed 15 May 2009.
The Transparency International Global Corruption Barom eter: 2007, http://www.transparency.org/policy_research/surveys_indices/gcb/2003__1; http://www.transparency.org/policy_research/surveys_indices/gcb/2004__1;http://www.transparency.org/policy_research/surveys_indices/gcb/2005; http://www.transparency.org/policy_research/surveys_indices/gcb/2006; http://www.transparency.org/policy_research/surveys_indices/gcb/2007. Accessed 15 May 2009.
Van der Merwe, R. and Pitt, L.: (2003). Are Excellent Companies Ethical? Evidence from an Industrial Setting, Corporate Reputation Review, 5(4), 343-355.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Halter, M.V., de Arruda, M.C.C. & Halter, R.B. Transparency to Reduce Corruption?. J Bus Ethics 84 (Suppl 3), 373–385 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-009-0198-6
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-009-0198-6