Abstract
Disagreement space consists of all the commitments and understandings required for an utterance to take on its discourse function. These are virtual standpoints that can be called out for explicit argumentation. This paper shows how the Inquisition systematically controlled disagreement space, preventing some apparently important standpoints from ever being argued about, and requiring attention to others that may not have initially seemed relevant. This control of disagreement space constituted violation of the rules for critical discussion. The essay suggests that the idea of disagreement space be slightly enlarged, to show the distinctions among virtual, possible, and actual disagreement spaces. The Inquisition's extra-argumentative power is what permitted its specification of the possible disagreement space. The analysis suggests that pragma-dialectics may have application in the criticism and analysis of social institutions.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
REFERENCES
Anonymous: 1980, 'A Manual for Inquisitors at Carcasonne, 1248-1249', in E. Peters (ed.), Heresy and Authority in Medieval Europe: Documents in Translation, University of Pennsylvania Press, Philadelphia, pp. 200–206. This is the Processus Inquisitionis.
Barrett, W. P. (trans.): 1931, The Trial of Jeanne d'Arc, Routledge, London.
Behringer, W.: 1997, Witchcraft Persecutions in Bavaria (trans. By J. C. Grayson and D. Lederer), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Boguet, H.: 1929, An Examen of Witches. Trans. by E. A. Ashwin. NP: John Rodker. This is the Discours des Sorciers, originally published ca. 1590.
Boyer, P. and S. Nissenbaum (eds.): 1993, Salem-Village Witchcraft: A Documentary Record of Local Conflict in Colonial New England, Northeastern University Press, Boston.
Burr, D.: 1998, Medieval Sources in Translation, http://dburr.hist.vt.edu/.
Cervantes, F.: 1994, The Devil in the New World: The Impact of Diabolism in New Spain, Yale University Press, New Haven, CT.
Del Col, A.: 1996, Domenico Scandella Known as Menocchio: His Trials before the Inquisition (1583-1599). Trans. by J. Tedeschi and A. C. Tedeschi, Medieval and Rennaissance Texts and Studies, Binghamton, NY.
Eemeren, F. H. van and R. Grootendorst: 1984, Speech Acts in Argumentative Discussions, Foris, Dordrecht, Holland.
Eemeren, F. H. van and R. Grootendorst: 1992, Argumentation, Communication, and Fallacies: A Pragma-Dialectical Perspective, Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ.
Eemeren, F. H. van, R. Grootendorst, S. Jackson and S. Jacobs: 1993, Reconstructing Argumentative Discourse, University of Alabama Press, Tuscaloosa, Alabama.
Geis, G. and I. Bunn: 1997, A Trial of Witches: A Seventeenth-Century Witchcraft Prosecution, Routledge, New York.
Ginzburg, C.: 1980, The Cheese and the Worms. Trans. by J. Tedeschi and A. Tedeschi, Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore.
Ginzburg, C.: 1983, Night Battles: Witchcraft and Agrarian Cults in the Sixteenth and Seventeenth Centuries, trans. by J. Tedeschi and A. Tedeschi, Penguin, New York.
Given, J. B.: 1997, Inquisition and Medieval Society: Power, Discipline, and Resistance in Languedoc, Cornell University Press, Ithaca, NY.
Gui, B.: 1991, 'The Conduct of the Inquisition of Heretical Depravity' in W. L. Wakefield and A. P. Evans (eds.), Heresies of the High Middle Ages, Columbia University Press, New York, pp. 373–445. This is Part V, the procedural part, of Gui's Practica Inquisitionis Heretice Pravitatis, dating from about 1323–1324.
Haliczer, S.: 1990, Inquisition and Society in the Kingdom of Valencia 1478-1834, University of California Press, Berkeley, CA.
Hample, D.: 1998, 'Reflexive Argument: Joan d'Arc and Other Victims', in J. F. Klumpp (ed.), Argument in a Time of Change: Definitions, Frameworks, and Critiques, National Communication Association, Annandale, VA, pp. 243–249.
Henningsen, G.: 1980, The Witches' Advocate: Basque Witchcraft and the Spanish Inquisition, University of Nevada Press, Reno, NV.
Hutchby, I.: 1996, Confrontation Talk: Arguments, Asymmetries, and Power on Talk Radio, Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ.
Kieckhefer, R.: 1979, Repression of Heresy in Medieval Germany, Liverpool University Press, Liverpool.
Kramer, H. and J. Sprenger: 1971, Malleus Maleficarum. Trans. by M. Summers. Dover, New York. Originally published, ca. 1486.
Lea, H. C.: 1907, A History of the Inquisition of Spain, 4 vols, MacMillan, New York.
Lea, H. C.: 1955, A History of the Inquisition of the Middle Ages, 3 vols, Harbor Press, New York. Reprint of 1887 edition.
Le Roy Ladurie, E.: 1978, Montaillou: The Promised Land of Error, trans. by B. Bray, Braziller, New York.
Mather, C.: 1991, Cotton Mather on Witchcraft, Dorset Press, New York.
Peters, E.: 1988, Inquisition, Free Press, New York.
Russell, J. B.: 1972, Witchcraft in the Middle Ages, Cornell University Press, Ithaca, NY.
Stork, N.: 1996, The Inquisition Record of Jacques Fournier Bishop of Pamiers 1318–1325, http://www.sjsu.edu/depts/english/Fournier/jfournhm.htm.
Sullivan, K.: 1996, '"I Do Not Name to You the Voice of St. Michael": The Identification of Joan of Arc's Voices', in B. Wheeler and C. T. Wood (eds.), Fresh Verdicts on Joan of Arc, Garland, New York, pp. 85–112.
Trask, R. B.: 1992, "The Devil Hath Been Raised": A Documentary History of the Salem Village Witchcraft Outbreak of March 1692, Phoenix, West Kennebunk, ME.
Vicuña Mackenna, B.: 1869, Francisco Moyen: Or the Inquisition As It Was in South America. Trans. By J. W. Duffy, Henry Sotherran & Co., London.
Walsh, W. T.: 1969, Characters of the Inquisition, Kennikat Press, Port Washington, NY. Originally published, 1940.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Hample, D. A Pragma-Dialectical Analysis of the Inquisition. Argumentation 15, 135–149 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1011104901299
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1011104901299