Abstract
College students rated the causal efficacy of elements X, A, and B of food compounds AX and BX in producing the allergic reaction of a hypothetical patient. Causal ratings were made for each food after subjects received all of the results of a 16-day allergy test. With both serial and simultaneous presentation of information, ratings of distinctive elements A and B diverged and ratings of common element X decreased as the difference between the correlation of AX and BX with the allergic reaction increased. These human diagnostic judgments closely correspond with stimulus selection effects observed in the conditioned responses of animals in associative learning studies.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Algom, D., & Bizman, A. (1983). Attribution theory: A conditioning interpretation. Perceptual & Motor Skills, 56, 767–774.
Baker, A. G., Berbrier, M. W., & Vallee-Tourangeau, F. (1989). Judgments of a 2 × 2 contingency table: Sequential processing and the learning curve. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 41B, 65–97.
Chapman, G. B. (1991). Trial order affects cue interaction in contingency judgment. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 17, 837–854.
Chapman, G. B., & Robbins, S. J. (1990). Cue interaction in human contingency judgment. Memory & Cognition, 18, 537–545.
Cheng, P. W., & Holyoak, K. J. (1985). Pragmatic reasoning schemas. Cognitive Psychology, 17, 391–416.
Dickinson, A., Shanks, D., & Evenden, J. (1984). Judgment of act-outcome contingency: The role of selective attribution. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 36A, 29–50.
Gluck, M. A., & Bower, G. H. (1988). From conditioning to category learning: An adaptive network model. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 117, 227–247.
Mackintosh, N. J. (1975). A theory of attention: Variations in the associability of stimuli with reinforcement. Psychological Review, 82, 276–298.
Pearce, J. M., & Hall, G. (1980). A model for Pavlovian learning: Variations in the effectiveness of conditioned but not of unconditioned stimuli. Psychological Review, 87, 532–552.
Rescorla, R. A., & Wagner, A. R. (1972). A theory of Pavlovian conditioning: Variations in the effectiveness of reinforcement and non-reinforcement. In A. H. Black & W. F. Prokasy (Eds.), Classical conditioning II: Current research and theory (pp. 64–99). New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
Shanks, D. R. (1986). Selective attribution and the judgment of causality. Learning & Motivation, 17, 311–334.
Shanks, D. R. (1989). Selectional processes in causality judgment. Memory & Cognition, 17, 27–34.
Shanks, D. R. (1991). On similarities between causal judgments in experienced and described situations. Psychological Science, 2, 1–10.
Shanks, D. R., & Dickinson, A. (1987). Associative accounts of causality judgment. In G. H. Bower (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation (pp. 229–261). New York: Academic Press.
Wagner, A. R., Logan, F. A., Haberlandt, K., & Price, T. (1968). Stimulus selection in animal discrimination learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 76, 171–180.
Ward, W. C., & Jenkins, H. M. (1965). The display of information and the judgment of contingency. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 19, 231–241.
Wasserman, E. A. (1974). Stimulus-reinforcer predictiveness and selective discrimination learning in pigeons. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 103, 284–297.
Wasserman, E. A. (1990a). Attribution of causality to common and distinctive elements of compound stimuli. Psychological Science, 1, 298–302.
Wasserman, E. A. (1990b). Detecting response-outcome relations: Toward an understanding of the causal texture of the environment. In G. H. Bower (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation (pp. 27–82). New York: Academic Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Van Hamme, L.J., Wasserman, E.A. Cue competition in causality judgments: The role of manner of information presentation. Bull. Psychon. Soc. 31, 457–460 (1993). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03334962
Received:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03334962