Skip to main content
Log in

Alternativen der Wissenschaftsgeschichte

  • Articles
  • Published:
Journal for General Philosophy of Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Alternatives in the History of Science. The paper deals with the function of the scientist's subjective activity in the research process. This will be discussed at the background of the discourse between distant action and narrow action theories of electromagnetism in 19th century physics. The analysis shows in which high degree the protagonists of these theories (Weber, Maxwell) regarded this situation consciously as a bifurcation (alternative) in the development of their science. This article describes then how the history of science values the case. The result of this valuation is dependent on the different philosophical points of view. Finally we point out some desiderata for the further discussion on methodology of science that would be the consequence of the acknowledgement of real bifurcations in scientific thought.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Literatur

  • Caneva, K. L.: 1978, ‘From Galvanism to Electrodynamics: The Transformation of German Physics and Its Social Context’,Hist. Stud. Phys. Sc. 9, 63–159.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cushing, J. T.: 1990, ‘Is Scientific Methodology Interestingly Atemporal?’,Brit. J. Phil. Sci. 41, 177–194.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fechner, G. Th.: 1906,Zend-Avesta oder über die Dinge des Himmels und des Jenseits, 3. Aufl., Hamburg/Leipzig.

  • Feyerabend, P.: 1976,Wider den Methodenzwang, Frankfurt a.M.

  • Feyerabend, P. K.: 1978,Der wissenschaftstheoretische Realismus und die Autorität der Wissenschaften. Braunschweig/Wiesbaden.

  • Hesse, M. B.: 1961,Forces and Fields, The Concept of Action at a Distance in the History of Physics, London.

  • Hertz, H.: 1895, ‘Über die Beziehungen zwischen den Maxwell'schen elektrodynamischen Grundgleichungen und den Grundgleichungen der gegnerischen Elektrodynamik’ (1884), in H. Hertz,Gesammelte Werke, Bd. 1, Leipzig.

  • Holton, G.: 1985,Introduction to Concepts and Theories in Physical Science. Sec. Ed., Princeton.

  • Kaiser, W.: 1977, ‘Operative Gesichtspunkte bei der Diskussion des Weberschen Gesetzes’,Zeitschr. f. allg. Wissenschaftstheorie 8, 39–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuhn, T. S.: 1977, ‘Objektivität, Werturteil und Theoriewahl’, in Kuhn, T. S.,Die Entstehung des Neuen, Frankfurt a.M.

  • Lakatos, I. and Musgrave, A. (ed.): 1974,Kritik und Erkenntnisfortschritt, Braunschweig.

  • Laudan, L.: 1989, ‘If It Ain't Broke, Don't Fix It’,Brit. J. Phil. Ss. 40, 369–375.

    Google Scholar 

  • Longair, M. S.: 1984,Theoretical Concepts in Physics, Cambridge.

  • Maxwell, J. Clerk: 1883,Lehrbuch der Electricität und des Magnetismus, 2 Bde., Berlin.

  • Maxwell, J. Clerk: 1890,The Scientific Papers, 2 Vols., Cambridge.

  • Meya, J.: 1990,Elektrodynamik im 19. Jahrhundert, Wiesbaden.

  • Mundy, B.: 1989, ‘Distant Action in Classical Electromagnetic Theory’,Brit. J. Phil. Sci. 40, 39–68.

    Google Scholar 

  • Post, H. R.: 1971, ‘Correspondence, Invariance and Heuristics: In Praise of Conservative Induction’,Stud. Hist. Phil. Sc. 2, 213–255.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pricha, W.: 1983, ‘Von Ampére zu Maxwell. Wilhelm Webers Briefe an Carl August v. Steinheil und die Elektrodynamik ihrer Zeit’, Dissertation, Bremen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stepin, V. S.: 1987, ‘Naučnye revoljucii kak “točki” bifurkacii v razvitii znanija’, inNaučnye revoljuccii v dinamike kultury, Minsk.

  • Stichweh, R.: 1984,Zur Entstehung des modernen Systems wissenschaftlicher Disziplinen. Physik in Deutschland 1740–1990, Frankfurt a.M.

  • Weber, W.: 1893,Wilhelm Weber's Werke, Bd. 3, Berlin.

  • Weber, W.: 1894,Wilhelm Weber's Werke, Bd. 4, Berlin.

  • Whittakker, E.: 1951,A History of the Theories of Aether and Electricity, Vol. 1, The Classical Theories, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiederkehr, K. H.: 1960, ‘Wilhelm Webers Stellung in der Entwicklung der Elektrizitätslehre’, Dissertation, Hamburg.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wise, M. N.: 1981, ‘German Concepts of Force, Energy, and the Electromagnetic Ether’ in Cantor, G. N. and Hodge, J. S. (ed.),Conceptions of Ether: Studies in the History of Ether Theories, 1740–1900, Cambridge.

  • Wise, M. N.: 1990, ‘Electromagnetic Theory in the Nineteenth Century’, in,Companion to the History of Modern Science, ed. by R. C. Olbyet al., London/New York.

  • Woodruff, A. E.: 1962, ‘Action at a Distance in Nineteenth Century Electrodynamics’,ISIS 53, 439–459.

    Google Scholar 

  • Worrall, J.: 1988, The Value of a Fixed Methodology’,Brit. J. Phil. Sci. 39, 263–275.

    Google Scholar 

  • Worrall, J.: 1989, ‘Fix it and be Damned: A Reply to Laudan’,Brit. J. Phil. Sc. 40, 376–388.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Haney, F. Alternativen der Wissenschaftsgeschichte. J Gen Philos Sci 25, 207–222 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00763821

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00763821

Key words

Navigation