Skip to main content
Log in

Book Review

  • Published:
Erkenntnis Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  • Ayres R. U., Van den Bergh J. C. J. M., Gowdy J. M. (2001). Strong versus Weak Sustainability: Economics, Natural Sciences, and “Consilience”. Environmental Ethics 23(2):155–168

    Google Scholar 

  • Beekman V. (2004). Sustainable Development and Future Generations. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 17(1):3–22

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hansson S. O. (2004). Weighing Risks and Benefits. Topoi 23:145–152

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hobbes, T.: 1642, ‚De Cive’, in English Works, (1839–1845), Vol 2, Bohn, London

  • Munda G. (1997). Environmental Economics, Ecological Economics, and the Concept of Sustainable Development. Environmental Values 6(2):213–233

    Google Scholar 

  • Rawls J. (1971). A Theory of Justice. Mass, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sidgwick H. (1907). The Methods of Ethics. Macmillan, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • World Commission on the Environment and Development (1987). Our Common Future. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Ziff P. (1990). Time Preference. Dialectica 44:43–54

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sven Ove Hansson.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hansson, S.O. Book Review. Erkenntnis 64, 419–422 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10670-006-9006-1

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10670-006-9006-1

Keywords

Navigation