Abstract
The purpose of this paper is to establish a proper context for reading Jacques Derrida’s The Gift of Death, which, I contend, can only be understood fully against the backdrop of “Violence and Metaphysics.” The later work cannot be fully understood unless the reader appreciates the fact that Derrida returns to “a certain Abraham” not only in the name of Kierkegaard but also in the name of Levinas himself. The hypothesis of the reading that follows therefore would be that Derrida writes The Gift of Death not as an attempt to re-present Kierkegaard’s Abraham either rightly or wrongly but as an effort to do with Kierkegaard’s Abraham what is possible with his thought in a broadly Levinasian/Derridean framework. That the reading he provides of the Abraham story would not be recognizable to Kierkegaard is not the principal point of Derrida’s effort; his aim is to demonstrate that Levinas should not have been so hasty to dismiss Kierkegaard but could have recovered his interpretation of Abraham for purposes that Derrida and Levinas both share.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Arroyo C. (2005) Unselfish salvation: Levinas, Kierkegaard, and the place of self-fulfillment in ethics. Faith and Philosophy 22.2: 160–172
Derrida, J. (1978). Violence and metaphysics. Writing and difference (A. Bass, Trans.) (pp. 79–153; 111). Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Derrida J. (1992) How to avoid speaking: Denials. In: Coward H., Foshay T. (eds) Derrida and negative theology. State University of New York Press, Albany
Derrida J. (1994) Given time I: Counterfeit money (P. Kamuf, Trans.). Chicago, University of Chicago Press
Derrida J. (1996) The gift of death (D. Wills, Trans.). The University of Chicago Press, Chicago
Derrida J. (2002) Force of law: The ‘mystical foundation of authority’. In: Anidjar G. (eds) Acts of religion. Routledge, New York
De Vries H. (1999) Philosophy and the turn to religion. The Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore
De Vries H. (2002) Religion and violence: Philosophical perspectives from Kant to Derrida. The Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore
Gasché R. (2007) European memories: Jan Patocka and Jacques Derrida on responsibility. Critical Inquiry 33: 291–311 305
Goiocoechea D. (1999) The moment of responsibility (Derrida and Kierkegaard). Philosophy Today 43.4: 210–225
Hanson, J. (Forthcoming). At the limits of religion without religion: A problem that cannot be resolved. Philosophy Today.
Larrea A. (2007) Anxious responsibility: Derrida’s appropriation of Kierkegaardian ‘fear and trembling’. In: Sharpe M., Noonan M., Freddi J. (eds) Trauma, history, philosophy: With feature essays by Agnes Heller and György Márkus. Newcastle, Cambridge Scholars Publishing, pp 76–101
Levinas E. (1998) Otherwise than being or beyond essence (A. Lingis, Trans.). Duquesne University Press, Pittsburgh
Lippitt J. (2003) Routledge philosophy guidebook to Kierkegaard and Fear and Trembling. Routledge, New York, pp 135–137
Milbank J. (1995) Can a gift be given? Prolegomena to a future trinitarian metaphysic. Modern Theology 11.1: 119–161
Milbank J. (1999) The ethics of self-sacrifice. First Things 91: 33–38
Turner D. (1998) The art of unknowing: Negative theology in late medieval mysticism. Modern Theology 14.4: 473–488
Westphal M. (2008) Levinas and Kierkegaard in dialogue. Indiana University Press, Bloomington
Wood D. (1997) Much obliged. Philosophy Today 41.2: 135–140
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Hanson, J. Returning (to) the gift of death: violence and history in Derrida and Levinas. Int J Philos Relig 67, 1–15 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11153-009-9206-0
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11153-009-9206-0