Skip to main content
Log in

Do explanation formats in elementary chemistry depend on agent causality?

  • Published:
Foundations of Chemistry Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

By setting out the grammar of event causality, as developed by Hume and Mackie, in contrast to the grammar of agent causality in the natural sciences, a kind of hybrid hierarchical format for chemical explanations is sketched. From this starting point the history of agentive concepts in chemistry is displayed as a progression from Newton’s ‘forces’, through the nineteenth century concepts of ‘affinity’ and ‘valency’ to recent theories of molecular binding in terms of the migration of electrons and protons as powerful particulars. The final stage of this development is the rewriting of chemical theory in terms of energy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Admirable though Cheng approach is, there are some serious shortcomings, in particular in her understanding of the Kantian proposal of schematisms (Wittgenstein ‘hinges’). Close study of her paper shows that it deals with the conditions under which the attribution of a causal power is reasonable, but has nothing to say on what causal powers are!

  2. Surely the thought that an event is a cause if it increases the probability of an expected effect is a consequence of believing that the event is a cause, and not an analysis of the causal concept itself (unless, of course, one were under the spell of neo-positivism!).

  3. I am grateful to Gareth McGuire for instruction in these matters.

  4. The expression ‘noble octet for the stable electron configuration derives from the determining role this structure has on the properties of the ‘noble’ gases, argon, neon etc.

References

  • Atkins, P.W., Beran, J.A.: General chemistry. New York, Scientific American Books (1989)

  • Belnap, N.: A theory of causation: causae causantes (originating causes) as Inus conditions in branching space-times. Br. J. Philos. Sci. 56 221–253 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, G.I.: A New Guide to Modern Valency Theory. Longman, London (1973)

    Google Scholar 

  • Cartwright, N.: Natural Capacities and their Measurement. Oxford University Press, Oxford (1987)

    Google Scholar 

  • Cheng, P.: From covariation to causation: a causal power theory. Psychol. Rev. 104, 367–405 (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  • Davy, H.: On some chemical agencies of electricity. Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc. 97, 1–56 (1807)

    Google Scholar 

  • Dennett, D.: Freedom Evolves. Allen Lane, London (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  • Ehring, D.: Causation and Persistence. Oxford University Press, New York and Oxford (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  • Friend, J.N.: The Theory of Valency. Longmans Green, London (1915)

    Google Scholar 

  • Fownes, G.: A manual of elementary chemistry: theoritical and practical. John Churchill, London (1856)

  • Gilbert, W.: De Magnete. London (1600)

  • Graham, T.: Elements of chemistry. London, Baillière (1850)

  • Harré, R., Madden, E.H.: Causal Powers. Blackwell, Oxford (1975)

    Google Scholar 

  • Hitchcock, C.: The intransivity of casusation revealed in equations and graphs. J. Philos. 98, 273–299 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  • Hiddleston, E.: Causal powers Br. J. Philos. Sci. 56, 27–59 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  • Hume, D.: A Treatise of Human Nature. John Noon, Book One, London (1739)

  • Leibniz, G.W.: The Monodology. Everyman-Dent, London (1714)

    Google Scholar 

  • Mackie, J.R.: The Cement of the Universe. Clarendon Press, Oxford (1974)

    Google Scholar 

  • Michotte, A.: The Perception of Causality. Methuen, London (1963)

    Google Scholar 

  • Newton, I.: Opticks, 4th edn. Royal Society, London (1730)

  • O’Connor, T.: Persons and Causes. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2002)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Purvis, M.K., Cranefield, S.J.S.: Causal agent modelling. Victoria University, Wellington, New Zealand (Unpublished paper) (1995)

  • Stemwedel, J.: Causes in chemical explanations. Annals New Yorl Academy Sci. 988, 217–226 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rom Harré.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Harré, R. Do explanation formats in elementary chemistry depend on agent causality?. Found Chem 13, 187–200 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10698-011-9120-2

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10698-011-9120-2

Keywords

Navigation