Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Extending eusociality to include vertebrate family units

  • letter
  • Published:
Biology & Philosophy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

We’re sorry, something doesn't seem to be working properly.

Please try refreshing the page. If that doesn't work, please contact support so we can address the problem.

References

  • Allen SF (2003) Working parents with young children: cross-national comparisons of policies and programs in three countries. Int J Soc Welf 12(4):261–273

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Batra SWT (1966) Nests and social behavior of halictine bees of India (Hymenoptera: Halictidae). Indian J Entomol 28:375–393

    Google Scholar 

  • Burda H, Honeycutt RL, Begall S, Locker-Grutjen O, Scharff A (2000) Are naked and common mole-rats eusocial and if so, why? Behav Ecol Sociobiol 47(5):293–303

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cassill DL (2002) Yoyo-bang: a risk aversion investment strategy by a perennial insect society. Oecologia 132:150–158

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cassill DL, Brown S, Swick D, Yanev G (2009) Polyphasic wake/sleep episodes in the fire ant, Solenopsis invicta. J Insect Behav 4:313–323

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crespi BJ (1992) Eusociality in Australian gall thrips. Nature 359:724–726

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crespi BJ, Yanega D (1995) The definition of eusociality. Behav Ecol 6(1):109–115

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davis-Walton J, Sherman PW (1994) Sleep arrhythmia in the eusocial naked mole-rat. Naturwissenschaften 81:272–275

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duffy JE (2003) The ecology and evolution of eusociality in sponge-dwelling shrimp. In: Kikuchi T, Higashi S, Azuma N (eds) Genes, behaviors and evolution of social insects. Hokkaido University Press, Sapporo, pp 217–254

    Google Scholar 

  • Duffy JE, Morrison CL, Rios R (2000) Multiple origins of eusociality among sponge-dwelling shrimps (Synalpheus). Evolution Int J org Evolution 54(2):503–516

    Google Scholar 

  • Foster KR, Ratnieks FLW (2005) A new eusocial vertebrate? Trends Ecol Evol 20(7):363–364

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holldobler B, Wilson EO (1995) Journey to the ants, 3rd edn. Harvard Belknap Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Jarvis JUM (1981) Eusociality in a mammal: cooperative breeding in naked mole-rat colonies. Science 212(4494):571–573

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jarvis JUM, Sherman PW (2002) Heterocephalus glaber. Mamm Species 706:1–9. Published by American Society of Mammalogists. doi:10.1644/1545-1410(2002)706<0001:HG>2.0.CO;2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lahdenpera M, Lummaa V, Helle S, Tremblay M, Russell AF (2004) Fitness benefits of prolonged post-reproductive lifespan in women. Nature 428:178–181

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McAuliffe K, Whitehead H (2005) Eusociality, menopause and information in matrilineal whales. Trends Ecol Evol 20(12):650–650

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sherman PW, Lacey EA, Reeve HK (1995) The eusociality continuum. Behav Ecol 6(1):102–108

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stern DL, Foster WA (1996) The evolution of soldiers in aphids. Biol Rev 71(1):27–79

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson EO (1971) The insect societies. Harvard Belknap Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson EO (1975) Sociobiology: the new synthesis, 3rd edn. Harvard Belknap Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Nina Fefferman and several anonymous reviewers for comments that greatly improved the manuscript. The authors especially thank Kim Sterelny, editor, for advice and encouragement during the review and acceptance process.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Benjamin E. Hardisty.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hardisty, B.E., Cassill, D.L. Extending eusociality to include vertebrate family units. Biol Philos 25, 437–440 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10539-009-9176-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10539-009-9176-8

Keywords

Navigation