Abstract
Subjects heard an excerpt of mock courtroom testimony and were later asked to rate statements about material in the testimony as “true,” “false,” or “of indeterminate truth value.” Half of the subjects heard a given piece of information (Mr. X rang the burglar alarm) directly asserted (I rang the burglar alarm), while the other half heard it only pragmatically implied or suggested (I ran up to the burglar alarm). Half of the subjects initially heard specific instructions about the pitfalls of interpreting pragmatically implied information as if it were asserted fact, while the other half had no such instructions. Half of the subjects performed the response task immediately after hearing the testimony, while the other half did so 2 days later. Subjects generally remembered both implications and assertions as definite fact, even when specifically warned not to do so.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Brewer, W. F. Memory for the pragmatic implications of sentences. Unpublished manuscript, 1974, Available from Department of Psychology, University of Illinois, Champaign, Illinois 61820.
Brewer, W. F., & Lichtenstein, E. H. Recall of logical and pragmatic implications in sentences with dichotomous and continuous antonyms. Memory & Cognition, 1975, 3, 315–318.
Clark, H. H. The language-as-fixed-effect fallacy: A critique of language statistics in psychological research. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 1973, 12, 335–359.
Harris, R. J. Memory and comprehension of implications and inferences of complex sentences. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 1974, 13, 626–637.
Harris, R. J. The psychology of pragmatic implication. KSU Human Information Processing Institute Report No. 75-2, April, 1975. Available from Department of Psychology, Kansas State University, Manhattan, Kansas 66506.
Johnson, M. K., Bransford, J. D., & Solomon, S. K. Memory for tacit implications of sentences. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1973, 98, 203–205.
Loftus, E. F., Altman, D., & Geballe, R. Effects of questioning upon a witness’s later recollections. Journal of Police Science and Administration, in press.
Loftus, E. F., & Palmer, J. C. Reconstruction of automobile destruction: An example of the interaction between language and memory. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 1974, 13, 585–589.
Loftus, E. F.,& Zanni, G. Eyewitness testimony: The influence of the wording of a question. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 1975, 5, 86–88.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
This work was supported by a grant to the first author from the Kansas State University Faculty Research Award Committee. Appreciation is expressed to Virginia Dicks for running subjects and to Dennis Blair for his helpful comments on an earlier draft of the manuscript. A more complete report of this study is available from Richard J. Harris
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Harris, R.J., Teske, R.R. & Ginns, M.J. Memory for pragmatic implications from courtroom testimony. Bull. Psychon. Soc. 6, 494–496 (1975). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03337547
Received:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03337547