Skip to content
BY 4.0 license Open Access Published by De Gruyter Open Access September 13, 2019

The Coldness of Forgetting: OOO in Philosophy, Archaeology, and History

  • Graham Harman EMAIL logo
From the journal Open Philosophy

Abstract

This article begins by addressing a critique of my book Immaterialism by the archaeologists Þóra Pétursdóttirr and Bjørnar Olsen in their 2018 article “Theory Adrift.” As they see it, I restrict myself in Immaterialism to available historical documentation on the Dutch East India Company (VOC), and they wonder how my account might have changed if I had discussed more typical archaeological examples instead: wrecked and sunken ships, released ballast, deserted harbors, distributed goods, and derelict fortresses. In response, I argue that my account was not therefore non-archaeological, since ruins are the topic of archaeology only by accident: the real subject of the discipline is what Marshall McLuhan describes as “cold media,” in the sense that they are low in information. McLuhan’s distinction between hot and cold media is shown to be surprisingly analogous to Aristotle’s difference between continua and discrete substances, and some consequences are drawn from this analogy.

References

Aristotle. Poetics, Trans. by Joe Sachs. Bemidji, MN: Focus Publishing, 2012.10.1093/oseo/instance.00258601Search in Google Scholar

Aristotle. Metaphysics, Trans. by C.D.C. Reeve. Indianapolis: Hackett, 2016Search in Google Scholar

Aristotle. Physics, Trans. by C.D.C. Reeve. Indianapolis: Hackett, 2018.Search in Google Scholar

Bennett, Jane. “Systems and Things: A Response to Graham Harman and Timothy Morton,” New Literary History 43 (2012), 225-233.10.1353/nlh.2012.0020Search in Google Scholar

Bergson, Henri. Creative Evolution, Trans. by Arthur Mitchell. New York: Dover, 1998.Search in Google Scholar

Bowden, Mark. Killing Pablo: The hunt for the world’s greatest outlaw. New York: Grove Press, 2015.Search in Google Scholar

Bryant, Levi R. “Examples,” Larval Subjects blog, July 27, 2016. Available from: https://larvalsubjects.wordpress.com/2016/07/27/examples/ [Accessed 12 Mar 2019]Search in Google Scholar

Darwin, Charles. On the Origin of Species: By Means of Natural Selection. New York: Dover, 2006.Search in Google Scholar

Deleuze, Gilles. Difference and Repetition, Trans. by Paul Patton. New York: Columbia University Press, 1994.Search in Google Scholar

Eldredge, Niles and Stephen Jay Gould. “Punctuated Equilibria: An Alternative to Phyletic Gradualism.” In Models in Paleobiology. Ed. by Thomas J.M. Schopf. New York: Doubleday, 1972, 82-115.Search in Google Scholar

Foucault, M. The Archaeology of Knowledge and The Discourse on Language, Trans. by A.M. Sheridan Smith. New York: Pantheon Books, 1972.Search in Google Scholar

Greenberg, Clement. The Collected Essays and Criticism, Volume 2: Arrogant Purpose, 1945-1949. Ed. by John O’Brien. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1988.10.7208/chicago/9780226924748.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Greenberg, Clement. Late Writings. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 2003.Search in Google Scholar

Harman, Graham. Tool-Being: Heidegger and the Metaphysics of Objects. Chicago: Open Court, 2002.Search in Google Scholar

Harman, Graham. “Heidegger on Objects and Things.” In Making Things Public: Atmospheres of Democracy. Ed. by Bruno Latour and Peter Weibel. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2005.Search in Google Scholar

Harman, Graham. “The Importance of Bruno Latour for Philosophy,” Cultural Studies Review, 13:1 (2007), 31-49.10.5130/csr.v13i1.2153Search in Google Scholar

Harman, Graham. “The Tetrad and Phenomenology,” Explorations in Media Ecology 6:3 (2007), 189-196.Search in Google Scholar

Harman, Graham. Prince of Networks: Bruno Latour and Metaphysics. Melbourne: re.press, 2009.Search in Google Scholar

Harman, Graham. “The McLuhans and Metaphysics.” In New Waves in Philosophy of Technology. Ed. by Jan-Kyrre Berg Olsen, Evan Selinger and S. Riis. London: Palgrave, 2009, 100-122.10.1057/9780230227279_6Search in Google Scholar

Harman, Graham “Technology, Objects and Things in Heidegger,” Cambridge Journal of Economics, 34:1 (2010), 17-25. Harman, Graham. “Some Paradoxes of McLuhan’s Tetrad,” Umbr(a), No. 1 (2012), 77-95.Search in Google Scholar

Harman, Graham. “The Revenge of the Surface: Heidegger, McLuhan, Greenberg,” Paletten, Issue 291/292 (2013), 66-73. Harman, Graham. Bruno Latour: Reassembling the Political. London: Pluto, 2014.Search in Google Scholar

Harman, Graham. “Whitehead and Schools X, Y, and Z.” In The Lure of Whitehead. Ed. by Nicholas Gaskill and Adam Nocek. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 2014, 231-248.10.5749/minnesota/9780816679959.003.0009Search in Google Scholar

Harman, Graham. Immaterialism: Objects and Social Theory. Cambridge, UK: Polity, 2016.Search in Google Scholar

Harman, Graham. “Decadence in the Biographical Sense: Taking a Distance from Actor-Network Theory. International Journal of Actor-Network Theory and Technological Innovation, 8:3 (July-September 2016), 1-8.10.4018/IJANTTI.2016070101Search in Google Scholar

Harman, Graham. 2019. “Hyperobjects and Prehistory.” In Time and History in Prehistory. Ed. by Stella Souvatzi, Adnan Baysal & Emma L. Baysal. London: Routledge, 2019, 195-209.Search in Google Scholar

Heidegger, Martin. Being and Time. Trans. by John Macquarrie and Edward Robinson. New York: Harper, 1962.Search in Google Scholar

Jonas, Hans. Gnostic Religion. Boston: Beacon Press, 1963.Search in Google Scholar

Ladyman, James and Donald Ross, with David Spurrett and John Collier. Every Thing Must Go: Metaphysics Naturalized. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199276196.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Latour, Bruno. Pandora’s Hope: Essays on the Reality of Science Studies. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1999.Search in Google Scholar

Latour, Bruno. Reassembling the Social: An Introduction to Actor-Network-Theory. Oxford University Press, 2005.Search in Google Scholar

Latour, Bruno. Personal communication, September 6, 2016.Search in Google Scholar

Leibniz, G.W. Philosophical Essays, Trans. By Roger Ariew & Daniel Garber. Indianapolis: Hackett, 1989.Search in Google Scholar

Margulis, Lynn. Symbiotic Planet: A New Look at Evolution. New York: Basic Books, 1999.Search in Google Scholar

McLuhan, Marshall. Understanding Media: The Extensions of Man. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1994.Search in Google Scholar

McLuhan, Marshall and Eric McLuhan. Laws of Media: The New Science. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 1992.Search in Google Scholar

Morton, Timothy. Hyperobjects: Philosophy and Ecology After the End of the World. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 2013.Search in Google Scholar

Pétursdóttirr, Þora and Bjørnar Olsen. “Theory Adrift: The Matter of Archaeological Theorizing,” Journal of Social Archaeology, 18.1 (2018), 97-117.10.1177/1469605317737426Search in Google Scholar

Sellars, Wilfrid. In the Space of Reasons: Selected Essays of Wilfrid Sellars. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2007.Search in Google Scholar

Simondon, Gilbert. L’individuation à la lumière des notions de forme et d’information. Grenoble: Jérôme Millon, 2005.Search in Google Scholar

Smolin, Lee. Three Roads to Quantum Gravity. New York: Basic Books, 2008.Search in Google Scholar

Whitehead, Alfred North. Process and Reality. New York: Free Press, 1978.Search in Google Scholar

Webmoor, Timothy and Christopher L. Whitmore. “Things Are Us! A Commentary on Human/Things Relations Under the Banner of a ‘Social’ Archaeology,” Norwegian Archaeology Review, 41.1 (2008), 53-70.10.1080/00293650701698423Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2019-06-17
Accepted: 2019-08-19
Published Online: 2019-09-13

© 2019 Graham Harman, published by De Gruyter Open

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Downloaded on 8.5.2024 from https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/opphil-2019-0023/html
Scroll to top button