Abstract
Since the introduction of the U.S. Sarbanes-Oxley Act in 2002 and several other national corporate governance codes, whistleblowing policies have been implemented in a growing number of companies. Existing research indicates that this type of governance codes has a limited direct effect on ethical or whistleblowing behaviour whereas whistleblowing policies at the corporate level seem to be more effective. Therefore, evidence on the impact of (inter)national corporate governance codes on the content of corporate whistleblowing policies is important to understand their indirect impact on whistleblowing behaviour. This study analyzes the contents of whistleblowing policies, and parts of corporate codes of conduct and codes of ethics, describing such policies of 56 leading European companies. By classifying the contents in seven categories, an exploratory framework was created. General contents often identified were: applicability to all employees, a group-wide scope and an authoritative tone. The most common general violations to report were breaches of internal policies and external regulations or laws. The more specific violations most frequently mentioned were criminal offences and dangers to health and safety or the environment. Contacts to report to were the direct or indirect supervisors, a compliance officer or a confidential “hotline” facility. A confidentiality guarantee was common and anonymous reporting was often possible, though sometimes discouraged. Protection against retaliation is stated by ensuring that retaliation will not happen, prohibiting it or making it punishable. The requirement of good faith was frequently given. Finally, investigation of the report was often guaranteed. Surprisingly little information is given on the treatment of whistleblowers reporting an unfounded complaint in good faith, or reporting a violation they were involved in. The study’s findings are most relevant to companies without a whistleblowing policy or those that intend to benchmark their policies, and to pan-European standard setters.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Arnold D., L. Ponemon 1991, “Internal Auditors’’ Perceptions of Whistle-Blowing and the Influence of Moral Reasoning: An Experiment. Auditing: A Journal of Theory and Practice 10: 1–15
Association Française des Entreprises Privées and Mouvement des Entreprises de France: 2003, The Corporate Governance of Listed Corporations, AFEP and MEDEF, Paris
Barnett T., D. S. Cochran, G. S. Taylor 1993, The Internal Disclosure Policies of Private-Sector Employers: An Initial Look at Their Relationship to Employee Whistleblowing. Journal of Business Ethics 12: 127–136
Brass D. J., K. D. Butterfield, B. C. Skaggs 1998, Relationships and Unethical Behaviour: A Social network Perspective. Academy of Management Review 23(1):14–31
Brinkmann, J. A. and K. Ims: 2003, ‘Good Intentions Aside: Drafting a Functionalist Look at Codes of Ethics’, Business Ethics: A European Review 12, 265–274
Brody, R., J. Coulter and P. Mihalek 1998, ‘Whistle-Blowing: A Cross-Cultural Comparison of Ethical Perceptions of U.S. and Japanese Accounting Students’, American Business Review, 14–21
Callahan E. S., J. W. Collins 1992, Employee attitudes toward whistleblowing: Management and public policy implications. Journal of Business Ethics 11(12):939–948
Corporate Governance Committee (CGC) 2004, Belgian Code on Corporate Governance, Corporate Governance Committee, Brussels
Corporate Governance Committee (CGC) 2003, The Dutch Corporate Governance Code: Principles of Good Corporate Governance and Best Practice Provisions, Corporate Governance Committee, The Hague
Dechert 2005, Dechert OnPoint, 19 September 2005 (Dechert, London)
Dworkin T. M., M. S. Baucus 1998, Internal vs. External Whistleblowers: A Comparison of Whistleblowing Processes. Journal of Business Ethics 17(12): 1281–1298
Dworkin T. M., J. P. Near 1997, A Better Statutory Approach to Whistleblowing. Business Ethics Quarterly 7: 1–16
Ergeneli A. 2005, A Cross-Cultural Comparison of Ethical Behavior in Business Related Dilemmas: A Comparison among Turkish, Egyptian, Kirghiz and Kazak Marketing Employees. Problems & Perspectives in Management 2: 135–147
Eversheds: 2005, HR Euronews, September 2005 (Eversheds, London)
Farrell B. J., D. M. Cobbin 2000, A Content Analysis of Codes of Ethics from Fifty-Seven National Accounting Organizations Business Ethics: A European Review, 9(3):180–190
Ferrel O. C., L. Gresham 1985, A Contingency Framework for Understanding Ethical Decision Making in Marketing. Journal of Marketing 49: 87–96
Financial Reporting Council (FRC): 2005, http://www.frc.org.uk/corporate/combinedcode.cfm
Financial Services Authority (FSA) 2003, The Combined Code on Corporate Governance (FSA, London)
Financiële Telegraaf: August 12, 2005, ING Bank Schikt met in opspraak geraakie directeur
Gaumnitz B. R., J. C. Lere 2002, Contents of Codes of Ethics of Professional Business Organizations in the United States. Journal of Business Ethics 35: 35–49
Gernon, H: 1993, ‘Discussion of an Investigation of the Reporting of Questionable Acts in an International Setting’, Journal of Accounting Research (Supplement), 104–110
Government Commission German Corporate Governance Code (GCGC) 2002, German Corporate Governance Code, Government Commission German Corporate Governance Code, Düsseldorf
Jones T. M. 1991, Ethical decision making by individuals in organizations: an issue-contingent model. Academy of Management Review 16(2): 366–395
Jubb P. B. 1999, Whistleblowing: A Restrictive Definition and Interpretation. Journal of Business Ethics 21: 77–94
Kaptein M. 2004, Business Codes of Multinational Firms: What Do They Say? Journal of Business Ethics 50: 13–31
Kennedy Van der Laan Corporate Law Group: 2005, The Dutch Corporate Governance Code (Code Tabaksblat): An Update, August 2005 (Kennedy Van der Laan, Amsterdam), found on http://www.legal500.com/devs/nether/cc/current.htm
Kjonstad B., H. Willmott 1995, Business Ethics: Restrictive or Empowering? Journal of Business Ethics, 14(6): 445–464
KPMG 2005, KPMG International Survey of Corporate Responsibility Reporting 2005, University of Amsterdam and KPMG Global Sustainability Services, Amsterdam
Larmer R. A. 1992, Whistleblowing and Employee Loyalty. Journal of Business Ethics 11(2):125–128
Lewis D. 2002 Whistleblowing Procedures at Work: What Are The Implications for Human Resource Practitioners? Business Ethics: A European Review 11(3): 202–209
Lewis D. 1997, Whistleblowing at Work: Ingredients for an Effective Procedure. Human Resource Management Journal 7(4):5–11
Lindsay R. M., L. M. Lindsay, V. B. Irvine 1996 Instilling Ethical Behavior in Organizations: A Survey of Canadian Companies. Journal of Business Ethics 15(4):393–408
Marnburg E. 2000, The Behavioural Effects of Corporate Ethical Codes: Empirical Findings and Discussion. Business Ethics A European Review 9(3):200–210
Mesmer-Magnus J. R., C. Viswesvaran 2005, Whistleblowing in Organizations: An Examination of Correlates of Whistleblowing Intentions, Actions, and Retaliation. Journal of Business Ethics 62(3): 277–297
Miceli M. P., J. P. Near 1994, Relationships Among Value Congruence, Perceived Victimization, and Retaliation Against Whistle-blowers. Journal of Management 20(4): 773–794
Miceli M. P., J. P. Near 1988, Indicidual and Situational Correlates of Whistleblowing. Personnel Psychology 41: 267–281
Ministry of Justice: 2004, Tabaksblat Code Enters into Force, 27 December 2004, http://www.justitie.nl/english/press/press_releases/archive/archive_2004/30 1204Tabaksblat.asp
Near J. P., T. M. Dworkin 1998, Responses to Legislative Changes: Corporate Whistleblowing Policies. Journal of Business Ethics 17(14):1551–1561
Near J. P., T. M. Dworkin, M. P. Miceli 1993, Explaining the Whistle-Blowing Process: Suggestions from Power Theory and Justice Theory. Organization Science 4(3):393–411
Near J. P., Miceli M. P. 1986 Retaliation Against Whistle-blowers: Predictors and Effects. Journal of Applied Psychology 71: 137–145
Near J. P., M. P. Miceli 1985, Organizational Dissidence: The Case of Whistleblowing. Journal of Business Ethics 4: 1–16
Near J. P., M. Rehg, M. P. Miceli, J. R. Van Scotter 2004, Developing a Model of The Whistle-Blowing Process: How Does Type of Wrongdoing Affect the Process? Business Ethics Quarterly 14: 219–242
Nitsch D., M. Baetz, J. C. Hughes 2005, Why Code of Conduct Violations go Unreported: A Conceptual Framework to Guide Intervention and Future Research. Journal of Business Ethics 57:327–341
O’Dwyer B., G. Madden 2006, Ethical Codes of Conduct in Irish Companies: A Survey of Code Content and Enforcement Procedures. Journal of Business Ethics 63(3): 217–236
PricewaterhouseCoopers: 2005, Protecting the Brand: The Evolving Role of Compliance Functions and the Challenges of the Next Decade
Salem, G. R. and L. M. Franze: 2002, ‘Corporate Compliance: The Whistleblower Provisions of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002’, Insights: The Corporate and Securities Law Advisor, December 1, 2002
Schmidt M. 2005, “Whistle Blowing” Regulation and Accounting Standards Enforcement in Germany and Europe—An Economic Perspective. International Review of Law & Economics 25(2):143–168
Schwarz M. 2001, The Nature of the Relationship between Corporate Codes of Ethics and Behaviour. Journal of Business Ethics 32:247–262
Sims R. R. 1991, The Institutionalization of Organizational Ethics. Journal of Business Ethics 10(7): 493–506
Sims R. R., J. D. Brinkmann 2003, Enron Ethics (Or: Culture Matters More than Codes). Journal of Business Ethics 45(3):243–256
Street M. D. 1995, Cognitive moral development and organizational commitment: Two potential predictors of.... Journal of Applied Business Research 11(4): 104–110
Swiss Bankers Association (SBA) 2005, Swiss Federal Banking Commission’s Circular on Internal Surveillance and Control: the Swiss Bankers Association Wants Made-to-Measure Solutions and not Blanket State Regulation, 3 August 2005 (Swiss Bankers Association, Basel)
Tabaksblat, M.: 2003, Speech door de voorzitter van de commissie corporate governance, mr. Morris Tabaksblat, bij de presentatie van de definitieve versie van ‘De Nederlandse corporate governance code’, 9 December 2003
Thomas J. Z., D. L. Miller 2005, Examining Culture’s Effect on Whistle-Blowing and Peer Reporting. Business & Society, 44(4): 462–486
Trevino L. K. 1986, Ethical Decision Making in Organizations: A Person-Situation Interactionist Model. Academy of management Review 11(3):601–617
Trevino L. K., B. A. Victor 1992, Peer Reporting of Unethical Behavior: A Social Context Perspective. Academy of Management Journal 35: 38–64
United Kingdom Parliament 1998, Public Interest Disclosure Act 1998, U.K. Parliament, London
United States Congress 2002, Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, U.S. Congress, Washington, DC
Vandekerckhove W., M. S. R. Commers 2004, Whistle Blowing and Rational Loyalty. Journal of Business Ethics 53: 225–233
Van Es R., G. Smit 2003, Whistleblowing and Media Logic: A Case Study. Business Ethics: A European Review, 12(2) 144–150
Weaver G. R., L. K. Trevino, P. L. Cochran 1999, Corporate Ethics Practices in the Mid-1990’s: An Empirical Study of the Fortune 1000. Journal of Business Ethics 18(3): 283–294
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Open Access This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0 ), which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.
About this article
Cite this article
Hassink, H., de Vries, M. & Bollen, L. A Content Analysis of Whistleblowing Policies of Leading European Companies. J Bus Ethics 75, 25–44 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-006-9236-9
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-006-9236-9